qwerty
Well-known member
shadax said:qwerty said:shadax said:qwerty said:i could be wrong but home prices are take into account whether or not the area homes have MR. if you bought a home in Laguna Niguel, if there was no MR, that means that the home price was just that much higher. these things are priced at what can be financed which is the total combo of principal/interest/insurance/taxes/MR/HOA.
So when people get concerned about the MR, all that means is that the home price has to be that much lower so someone can afford it. so while i understand the visual/mental impact of paying 8K in MR its just one component of the cost. If these augusta homes had no mello roos, they would be priced 150-200K higher. This is the same with the new homes in Stonegate, Portola Springs, Laguna altura, if there was no MR there, i can guarantee you TIC would jack up the price 100-200K more, whatever the MR converts to in terms of principal equivalent.
If you could pay up front, it wouldn't be as big of a deal. But besides, Stonegate is $3600 per year.
that is the point im trying to make. Stonegate is $3,600 per year in MR, but if it was 8,000, the price of the home would be lower. at the end of the day you have to compare the total monthly payment to be able to compare apples to apples and then adjust for the location premium. to compare one developments MR of 8,000 with another for 6K or 3,6000 is somewhat irrelevant.
True enough, but let's not forget that you can deduct mortgage interest, but not MR (legally).
As long as it's plain as day how much it will be and everyone knows, I guess the market will decide what the corresponding price will be.
yeah, we cant even deduct the property taxes and like you said MR is not deductible. So a place like Augusta that would be upwards of 14K in property taxes and MR is kind of hard to swallow. so for us, like you said, we would prefer the MR component of the overall price to be as small as possible