NanoWest_IHB
New member
IT-Guy,
The bank would have the first mortgage and the "old homeowner" or "seller" is the second mortgage holder. In the event that you default on the loans, and the house were to go into forclosure(default) the bank gets their money first when the house is sold at auction. Whatever is left over goes to the second mortgage holder(or old homeowner)
As far as the bank is concerned you are purchasing a house with 20% down, so it looks like a traditional mortgage to them. The sellers that have the second mortage are taking most of the risk in the transaction. They stand to lose the 20% in the event that you default on the loan.
You see, in the old days, banks would make home buyers put down 20% just in case the value of the home went down and the house went into forclosure. This way the bank was almost certain to get their money back.
This is a similar structure to the 100% financing that was going on for the past 6 years. One bank would loan the down payment(20%) and another bank would loan the other 80% of the housing cost. In the event that payments are not made, either the first or second mortgage holder can force a forclosure on the property. With the 100% financing deals, the 20% financing for the second mortgage carried a much higher interest rate.
The bank would have the first mortgage and the "old homeowner" or "seller" is the second mortgage holder. In the event that you default on the loans, and the house were to go into forclosure(default) the bank gets their money first when the house is sold at auction. Whatever is left over goes to the second mortgage holder(or old homeowner)
As far as the bank is concerned you are purchasing a house with 20% down, so it looks like a traditional mortgage to them. The sellers that have the second mortage are taking most of the risk in the transaction. They stand to lose the 20% in the event that you default on the loan.
You see, in the old days, banks would make home buyers put down 20% just in case the value of the home went down and the house went into forclosure. This way the bank was almost certain to get their money back.
This is a similar structure to the 100% financing that was going on for the past 6 years. One bank would loan the down payment(20%) and another bank would loan the other 80% of the housing cost. In the event that payments are not made, either the first or second mortgage holder can force a forclosure on the property. With the 100% financing deals, the 20% financing for the second mortgage carried a much higher interest rate.