[quote author="irvinehomeowner"]
[quote author="pete423"]
I think they are both about equal. Sonoma has a great floor plan. Sonoma gave me a nice open feel to the unit and it felt bigger than the Los Arobles plan 3. But Sonoma felt more like a cookie cutter compared to the Los Arobles. Los Arobles has much better architecture details. Both units don't have much of a yard. I personally like the setup of Portola Springs better than Woodbury. But woodbury has cheaper HOA and Mello Roos. So again, I think about the same. Oh and Sonoma's location is horrible. I can hear the traffic noise from Sand Canyon at the model home. The model homes are at the furthermost point from Sand Canyon in the whole Sonoma development.[/quote]
Since I got builder-blocked at Montecito/Carmel and then also at Coronado... we headed over to Los Arboles to check it out.
I mostly agree with pete about location and the external look of Sonoma but interior wise, Sonoma feels much bigger. The ceilings are higher than Los Arboles and the layout is more functional. Plan 3 in Los Arboles splits the living are and the dining/kitchen which some families may like but it's not conducive to the entertainment aspect.
I prefer the execution of the master baths in Los Arboles as the showers are enclosed and separate (except for Plan 3) but Plans 1/2 have the laundry as pass through from the garage which is a nitpick of mine.
As for the street noise, you won't notice it inside the house but I know what pete is referring to.
For the dollar, I would rather buy Sonoma (or maybe even Montecito) because they are true SFRs and you don't have the saddle of that extra HOA (translates to a difference in final price). And Plans 1/2 in Los Arboles are actually attached at corners (no sharing walls from what I see). The floorplans are a personal preference but overall I liked Sonoma and from the floorplans only, Montecito more.[/quote]
I could agree more. Sonoma has better floor plan and much bigger feel to it. For the money I would go with Sonoma hands down. But I have decided not to go for the money but instead go for what's important to me which was backyard and noise level. The noise I was refered to is when you are in the yard. I know it is not much but it bugs me to pay 800k+ plus and to hear the traffic when I am in my backyard. Plan 1/2 are attached at the first 10 ft or so where the garage is at. The $256 does include the Portola Master Association.
[quote author="pete423"]
I think they are both about equal. Sonoma has a great floor plan. Sonoma gave me a nice open feel to the unit and it felt bigger than the Los Arobles plan 3. But Sonoma felt more like a cookie cutter compared to the Los Arobles. Los Arobles has much better architecture details. Both units don't have much of a yard. I personally like the setup of Portola Springs better than Woodbury. But woodbury has cheaper HOA and Mello Roos. So again, I think about the same. Oh and Sonoma's location is horrible. I can hear the traffic noise from Sand Canyon at the model home. The model homes are at the furthermost point from Sand Canyon in the whole Sonoma development.[/quote]
Since I got builder-blocked at Montecito/Carmel and then also at Coronado... we headed over to Los Arboles to check it out.
I mostly agree with pete about location and the external look of Sonoma but interior wise, Sonoma feels much bigger. The ceilings are higher than Los Arboles and the layout is more functional. Plan 3 in Los Arboles splits the living are and the dining/kitchen which some families may like but it's not conducive to the entertainment aspect.
I prefer the execution of the master baths in Los Arboles as the showers are enclosed and separate (except for Plan 3) but Plans 1/2 have the laundry as pass through from the garage which is a nitpick of mine.
As for the street noise, you won't notice it inside the house but I know what pete is referring to.
For the dollar, I would rather buy Sonoma (or maybe even Montecito) because they are true SFRs and you don't have the saddle of that extra HOA (translates to a difference in final price). And Plans 1/2 in Los Arboles are actually attached at corners (no sharing walls from what I see). The floorplans are a personal preference but overall I liked Sonoma and from the floorplans only, Montecito more.[/quote]
I could agree more. Sonoma has better floor plan and much bigger feel to it. For the money I would go with Sonoma hands down. But I have decided not to go for the money but instead go for what's important to me which was backyard and noise level. The noise I was refered to is when you are in the yard. I know it is not much but it bugs me to pay 800k+ plus and to hear the traffic when I am in my backyard. Plan 1/2 are attached at the first 10 ft or so where the garage is at. The $256 does include the Portola Master Association.