Presidential Elections

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
This unemployed Jack Smith?😂😂😂😂👍🏽🇺🇸🥃

'I would fire him within two seconds,' Trump says about Special Counsel Jack Smith​

WASHINGTON - Former President Donald Trump made it official Thursday: If he is re-elected, he would dismiss Special Counsel Jack Smith, who is prosecuting cases against him.

"I would fire him within two seconds,” Trump told radio show host Hugh Hewitt.

 
Because all those previous polls never took into account Trumps undercount…if they show a tie or within the margin of error… he is really ahead…if they show he is ahead…he is ahead by a ton. Those previous polls never showed him ahead… these do…she is doomed!😂😂😂😂👍🏽🇺🇸
Uh... 2020 polls? You kept claiming Trump victory then too.

Same with 2022 mid terms.

morekaos touch babeeeeeeeee!
 
he did win that one,🤷🏽‍♂️😂😂👍🏽. but regardless…Biden had a significant lead going into the election in the polls. This time Kackala has no lead in the polls so when you factor in his under polling Trump way ahead of her….shes doomed!👍🏽🇺🇸
 
Because all those previous polls never took into account Trumps undercount…if they show a tie or within the margin of error… he is really ahead…if they show he is ahead…he is ahead by a ton. Those previous polls never showed him ahead… these do…she is doomed!😂😂😂😂👍🏽🇺🇸
Actually... I want to back up and see if we can have a real convo here.

That is a good point that polls did not take into account Trump's undercount, but back then, Trump was an unknown factor so that makes sense.

But by 2020, Trump was very well known... and the polls were right.

Now, a POC woman as a presidential candidate could be considered an unknown factor (although she has been VP for 4 years), wouldn't that have some margin of undercount *you* are not considering?

That's why I think the polling is 50/50 but reality may actually lean Harris.

Still haven't answered if you will accept a Trump loss.
 
Actually, no, the undercount is specific to Republican/Democrat adjustments to the polling models. They always over sample Democrats, it doesn’t matter who the candidate is…. this time will be no different. Trump’s numbers are greater than they show…. as I’ve said, if she does not show a lead greater than the margin of error, Trump is ahead in that poll….she’s domed.!!👍🏽👍🏽🇺🇸🇺🇸
 
@Kalapa You're a paid shill right? Or the best would be if you're actually @morekaos 's alter ego - a character he created to keep himself entertained :ROFLMAO:

IHO - Why do people ask questions like "would you accept the result?" I see that on the MSM. It seems like a bizarre thing to ask so frequently. Would you agree to a specific reaction to something that hasn't happened yet? Do you promise to press the accelerator when the light turns green?
 
Last edited:
I'm not on MSM.

I ask because Trump didn't accept the 2020 results. Why is that so hard to understand? You know what is a bizarre thing? Not understanding that you lost both the popular and the electoral college but still thinking you won.

It's not a hard question... I can answer it, if Trump wins, I have to accept it. I won't like it but I'm not going to say the election was rigged for 4 years. You know what that's called? A sore loser... or a delusional one.
 
Crazy huh?🤦🏽‍♂️😂😂😂

Hillary Clinton Maintains 2016 Election ‘Was Not On the Level’: ‘We Still Don’t Know What Really Happened’​


“There was a widespread understanding that this election [in 2016] was not on the level,” Clinton said during an interview for the latest episode of The Atlantic’s politics podcast, The Ticket. “We still don’t know what really happened.”

“There’s just a lot that I think will be revealed. History will discover,” the Democratic Party’s 2016 presidential nominee continued.

 
Don't remember any Capital storming in 2017.

Did someone die that day too?

Maybe if Trump did it that way instead of calling people and trying to find more votes, people would have more respect for him.

Keep reaching bro!
 
I'm not on MSM.

I ask because Trump didn't accept the 2020 results. Why is that so hard to understand? You know what is a bizarre thing? Not understanding that you lost both the popular and the electoral college but still thinking you won.

It's not a hard question... I can answer it, if Trump wins, I have to accept it. I won't like it but I'm not going to say the election was rigged for 4 years. You know what that's called? A sore loser... or a delusional one.
What do you think about the fact that the government intervened with twitter & Facebook just before the 2020 election to suppress information about Hunter Biden that voters said would have changed their votes coupled with the fact that many of the electoral votes came down to fractions of a %? Redirect and say orange man bad no election fraud proven?
 
Really depends on who wins and who loses, huh? Soooo, just curious…was this also an insurrection?🤷🏽‍♂️😂😂😂😂

Democrats were for occupying capitols before they were against it

“Thousands of protesters rushed to the … Capitol Wednesday night, forcing their way through doors, crawling through windows and jamming corridors.” That is how one newspaper described the storming of the Capitol — not the one in Washington last week, but the state Capitol in Madison, Wis., a decade ago.

 
Don't remember any Capital storming in 2017.

Did someone die that day too?

Maybe if Trump did it that way instead of calling people and trying to find more votes, people would have more respect for him.

Keep reaching bro!
and how much do you want to bet that they do it again? and this time let’s see who gets called an insurrectionist…🤦🏽‍♂️👎🏽

Speaker Johnson ‘expects’ Democrats to object to 2024 election count if Trump beats Harris​


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/news/content/ar-AA1sFgs7?ocid=sapphireappshare
 
What do you think about the fact that the government intervened with twitter & Facebook just before the 2020 election to suppress information about Hunter Biden that voters said would have changed their votes coupled with the fact that many of the electoral votes came down to fractions of a %?

So wait... you can't ask about accepting a future result but you can ask about not accepting a past result based on a coulda woulda shoulda?

Redirect and say orange man bad no election fraud proven?

Don't have to say... actions speak louder than words.

And are you ignoring that it was ruled there was no election fraud? He lost the popular vote too, so odds are electoral results were accurate.
 
So wait... you can't ask about accepting a future result but you can ask about not accepting a past result based on a coulda woulda shoulda?



Don't have to say... actions speak louder than words.

And are you ignoring that it was ruled there was no election fraud? He lost the popular vote too, so odds are electoral results were accurate.
Your response tells me what I need to know.
 
That I'm not impressed by Harris but Trump is unfit to be president?

Or that if the Republicans had anyone but Trump as their candidate they might have got my vote?

Or that what I'm saying is what any reasonable person should be saying?
 
Back
Top