Worst set of house pictures, ever?

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
The house looks like it is in good shape, it would have only taken maybe a days worth of work to make it look ok. (Basically throwing away all the trash/junk)

I don't understand why they didn't even put that much effort into it?
 
You guys also forgot the picture of the holiday faux brick fireplace cover and purple tree...

S518100_6_0.jpg
 
These are lame pictures but it's almost more sad than anything that whoever took them obviously doesn't care at all about the place...

P627455_0.jpg


Looks like the type of fuzz you get when you take a picture from inside your car...

P627455_1_0.jpg


And this confirms it. So, they took one photo of the house from the side, and another of the street. Bang-up job, there.

Asking price: $450,000

Purchase price: $582,000 in 200
 
Why take pictures of the inside of the house when you can show the street? Although, based on the pictures from this thread. I can guess why they wouldn't show the interior.
 
What would possess someone to not only take, but include a picture of that garage in an MLS listing?

The clutter in that house would drive me batty. Those people seriously need to have a garage sale.
 
That is an infloor tub. Rare, but there is an entire complex of apartments in Tustin that had them when I was growing up. I don;t know the reason for it, but they are out there.
 
It could be a Japanese style bath, but at least in the hotels I stayed in, they had a screen between the toilet and bath, if the toilet wasn't in a room separated by a door.

Getting in and out of that bath would be a pain, too, especially with wet feet on a stone floor.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top