Goriot said:Irvineguy,
In response to younger generation - >80% of the SG residents are young families.
In response to WB being a better location -> I screened for sold homes between $600,000 and $1,250,000 in the past 3 months (Only Resales).
WB (27 transactions) - Average and median Price / Sqft = $408 and $393 / sqft
SG (12 transactions) - Average and median Price / Sqft = $439 and $434 / sqft
Doesn't better location = higher Price / Sqft??
paperboyNC said:Goriot said:Irvineguy,
In response to younger generation - >80% of the SG residents are young families.
In response to WB being a better location -> I screened for sold homes between $600,000 and $1,250,000 in the past 3 months (Only Resales).
WB (27 transactions) - Average and median Price / Sqft = $408 and $393 / sqft
SG (12 transactions) - Average and median Price / Sqft = $439 and $434 / sqft
Doesn't better location = higher Price / Sqft??
Attached condo, detached condo, SFR splits?
Goriot said:Irvineguy,
In response to younger generation - >80% of the SG residents are young families.
In response to WB being a better location -> I screened for sold homes between $600,000 and $1,250,000 in the past 3 months (Only Resales).
WB (27 transactions) - Average and median Price / Sqft = $408 and $393 / sqft
SG (12 transactions) - Average and median Price / Sqft = $439 and $434 / sqft
Doesn't better location = higher Price / Sqft??
irvineguy said:Goriot said:Irvineguy,
In response to younger generation - >80% of the SG residents are young families.
In response to WB being a better location -> I screened for sold homes between $600,000 and $1,250,000 in the past 3 months (Only Resales).
WB (27 transactions) - Average and median Price / Sqft = $408 and $393 / sqft
SG (12 transactions) - Average and median Price / Sqft = $439 and $434 / sqft
Doesn't better location = higher Price / Sqft??
WB going cheaper than SG? that's even more the reason to go with WB!! Even though location is the number 1, 2, and 3 indicator of future resale value, higher price /sqft does not necessary mean better location. Or else the next time we all shop for new homes all we will have to do is check out the price /sqft, pick the highest one, then we'll all be done! How simple would life be? I respect your opinions and you are obviously someone who does his/her homework and research, but in reality Irvine overall isn't developed enough to use price/sqft as the sole indicator to tell how good a location is, any current/future developments can shift the market. And both WB and SG are pretty much in their infancy; it's just too early to tell. Though I'm confident that the market will eventually correct itself and WB will not only be more sought after, but also more expensive than SG. Only in time we can tell, till then, we can only speculate.
Big ass +1. Why are ppl even talking about elementary school ratings like it means anything? Maybe bragging right for FCBs? We're not discussing Harvard vs CSULB (no offense to any Long Beach grads). Btw, Woodbury Elementary is a year round school so if a Woodbury resident wants their kid to go to a traditional elementary school, they can choose to go to brand spanking new Cypress Village Elementary which by all accounts sounds fantastic with the principal from Canyon View moving over.WTTCMN said:I'm probably in the minority on this but I think #1 elem is overrated. Will going or not going there really affect your kids future? But sure, I get the pull of sending your kids to the best school. But it's only for 5-6 years. What happens after? You are stuck in a motorcourt home breathing exhaust from cars going up and down your "street" with no yard. Oh and by then, your house will no longer be new or smell new.
Disclaimer: I don't live in either Woodbury or Stonegate so I don't have any skin in the game. I have lived in both and prefer Woodbury.
Probably partly due to Woodbury Elem being year round and many parents prefer traditional schedule.BuddyLeo said:Woodbury parents are clamoring to enroll their kids into Stonegate. That says it all.
Irvinecommuter said:paperboyNC said:Irvinecommuter said:test said:FCB prefer new construction. Location wise CV > WB > SG > PP > PS/LR
I think you're the only person who would put CV above WB or SG locationwise.
Test says closer to highway = better. A lot of buyers in the 900k price range don't mind paying $0.80 to use the 133 which is convenient from Stonegate and PP in particular.
There is closer to the highway (WB compared to SG) and then there is right next to the highway (CV). Also, CV gets a lot of congestion with the middle school, the highway entrances, and the shopping center (which was way too many lights).
Goriot said:paperboyNC said:Attached condo, detached condo, SFR splits?
About the same combination of mixes in the screening between the pools/neighborhoods.
Actually for SFR it's a tie.
Resales Only
Single Family Housing (Past 3 Months) - Tie
WB - Avg. $451 / Med. $450
SG - Avg. $452.5 / $452.5 (One transaction has no landscaping - flip).
Single Family Housing (Past 6 Months) - WB slightly higher
WB - Avg. $451 / Med. $443
SG - Avg. $437 / Med. $430
Townhomes / Motor Courts (Past 3 Months)
WB - Avg. $387 / Med. $381
SG - Avg. $436 / Med. $429
Weird thing is SG had 0 sold transactions below $400 / sqft. in the past 3 months.
zubs said:What happened to the lottery to get into Stonegate Elementary?
Even if you buy a house next to the school, you have to put your kids name into a raffle.
Is this still true?