irvineshadow said:I strongly disagree. There are areas where traffic is terrible but not for reasons you state. IMO the traffic tends to be terrible around schools and shopping plazas that have inadequate ingress and egress much of the day. And that's not many places.frank69m said:2) Traffic is terrible. Why do they need to re-pave every single road at the same time? It seems everytime I turn a corner, they are repaving a perfectly good road (compared to LA). This is the area I hate too much. Thanks Irvine City council for runing a good thing. I mean, why mess up Sand Canyon, do construction on Culver and mess up Barranca all at the same time. Why can't you do this separately? Short on money and just want to spend it at the end of the year? Buffoons if you ask me.
I can not for the life of me understand people who complain about infrastructure work. Irvine has awesome mostly clean streets, and they have to update them for the increasing size of the city as a destination to live and work. The work those projects create is good , well paying work for professionals and laborers, who tend to spend their money nearby. As long as the project doesn't over run terribly, the city and everyone involved usually ends up better for that work.
Have you ever been to New York City, where taxes are high and there is no infrastructure work done? The streets are all crappy and full of potholes and falling apart. And whatever work does get done seems to go on forever with no noticeable schedule.
You know...Irvine is supposed to be this master planned community, but what numb skull puts only 2 entrances on a shopping plaza?