Japan actually went through decades of depreciation, not inflation. Probably not the base case study if you're trying to demonstrate asset inflation.
The only things we are possibly tracking Japan, in terms of fiscal & monetary policy, would be negative interest rate and blowing through the national debt.
Given the fact that we're already recovering, negative interest rate is unlikely to happen anytime soon.
So that leaves the national debt.
Japan has proven econ experts & conventional econ wisdom wrong for years by demonstrating that a large economy (#3 in the world) can sustain a high level of national debt even with virtually no GDP growth. (over 250% debt to GDP ratio, negative GDP growth in the past decade)
This is on top of Japan having been on a steady population decline since 1998 & having one of the world's oldest population.
We don't have anywhere close to any of the above problems in the US.
Some people are freaking out over our national debt level, but the truth is we're barely over 100% debt to GDP ratio.
I think some proper context (Japan) should calm the anxiety.
Even though Japan has done QEs like we did, they spent a lot of their debt investing in infrastructures and its people. This is something we didn't do with our QEs.
If you look up various infrastructure scores and education scores, Japan has consistently ranked top in the developed world.
Their train and high speed rail systems are so top notch that approx. 85% of commuters in Japan goes to work by Train. ( vs less than 5% in north America)
Austerity is unpopular and politically difficult. So yes, we're more likely to follow Japan's trajectory when it comes to the national debt.
Can we sustain Japan level of debt without investing in infrastructures, education etc is a valid question.
But to draw that parallel we are becoming Japan's economy is pre-mature. We have actual GDP growth, population growth, and the USD is still the global reserve currency.