bkshopr_IHB
New member
<p> </p>
<p>VOC's planning and design is not refined as TIC communities. The infrastructure, amenities and landscape are cheaply done. The District retail center is cheap boxes dictated by parking sphere of influence without a strong gathering place and identity. The tenant mix is good and the center will do very well despite of bad, trendy and cheap architecture. TIC would have studied the traffic trip count to avoid any nightmare getting in and out of the center. Good planning insures future success and protect RE value. When VOC is done Lennar is getting the hell out of there. It has no incentive to do a good job at VOC because their future land holdings are somewhere else.</p>
<p>In order to create a good brand one must hold the price steady. I will use Louis Vuitton and Hermes as examples. There has never been any sale on these brands ever. The desire to have them is always high among the consumers.</p>
<p>Take another example Robinson May that went belly up. At any given time there were sales and discount coupons. The consumers immediately classified Robinson May as the Kmart of mall department store while Neiman, Saks and Nordstrom maintain their elite status by structuring their sale as yearly events. TIC IMO is trying to hold on to the branding but find a way to slashing prices without hurting the brand perception. I remembered certain high end handbags did not do very well the company destroyed the inventory rather than lowering prices.</p>
<p>I see VOC having the same elements as Aliso Viejo and RSM. It is not a neighborhood that homeowners would brag about in the future. They will tell people that they live in Tustin or Irvine but not in VOC. Proud homeowners would refer to the actual villages that they live in like Northpark, Turtle Ridge, Shady Canyon, Turtle Ridge, Woodbury or Northwood.</p>
<p>VOC's planning and design is not refined as TIC communities. The infrastructure, amenities and landscape are cheaply done. The District retail center is cheap boxes dictated by parking sphere of influence without a strong gathering place and identity. The tenant mix is good and the center will do very well despite of bad, trendy and cheap architecture. TIC would have studied the traffic trip count to avoid any nightmare getting in and out of the center. Good planning insures future success and protect RE value. When VOC is done Lennar is getting the hell out of there. It has no incentive to do a good job at VOC because their future land holdings are somewhere else.</p>
<p>In order to create a good brand one must hold the price steady. I will use Louis Vuitton and Hermes as examples. There has never been any sale on these brands ever. The desire to have them is always high among the consumers.</p>
<p>Take another example Robinson May that went belly up. At any given time there were sales and discount coupons. The consumers immediately classified Robinson May as the Kmart of mall department store while Neiman, Saks and Nordstrom maintain their elite status by structuring their sale as yearly events. TIC IMO is trying to hold on to the branding but find a way to slashing prices without hurting the brand perception. I remembered certain high end handbags did not do very well the company destroyed the inventory rather than lowering prices.</p>
<p>I see VOC having the same elements as Aliso Viejo and RSM. It is not a neighborhood that homeowners would brag about in the future. They will tell people that they live in Tustin or Irvine but not in VOC. Proud homeowners would refer to the actual villages that they live in like Northpark, Turtle Ridge, Shady Canyon, Turtle Ridge, Woodbury or Northwood.</p>