irvinehomeowner said:
paperboyNC said:
irvinehomeowner said:
@nsr:
You're doing a Larry and cherry picking. I can probably match you house for house with ones that didn't sell for 40% off (I think I have a thread for that somewhere here).
And I think the point is... what are they selling for now? Compared to 6 months to 1 year ago.
P.S. Typically Northpark homes sell for less (maybe the school district?) but I don't think the entire range of them were 40% off peak (and Mineral King isn't a real SFR, no driveway).
I don't it matters what they are selling for now. If you had really tried and gone after REOs and short sales and properties that needed some TLC you could have bought for 30-40% off peak pricing if you bought at the right time.
Well considering this topic is more or less "Are we in another bubble right now?", it sort of matters what they are selling for now.
There is a sidetrack of how much they actually dropped... but that's less significant than the notion that homes are selling now for close to or over their last bubble prices.
REOs, short sales, TLC does not make up the average of Irvine homes.
Except the fact that inflation was 16.1% since 2006 peak and if you refi-d out cash or carried a loan, you're carrying cost is another 20% less. Yes a lot of homes buy with cash, but they also turn around a refi cash back out.
A million dollar home in 2006 is a very different beast from a buying perspective than a million dollar home in 2013.
The present value of the monthly payment on a 70% LTV loan at a 2.5% discount is $200K.
The prices have climbed dramatically, but that is from the reality very steep drop. I don't understand the vested interest in pretending the few, it is few because sales volume was so low overall that it makes the statistics tough, other than trying to not feel like you missed it.
Bad news, you missed it. The bottom was three years ago. It's 2001 again, except this time, things are already cooling and the meth of easy financing isn't around.