[quote author="no_vaseline" date=1251633026][quote author="biscuitninja" date=1251610528][quote author="green_cactus" date=1251422172][quote author="irvine_home_owner" date=1251421425][quote author="green_cactus" date=1251421151]Random question ... do you guys pick your own "lucky" numbers or do the quick pick? I'm lazy and just go for the quick pick instead of agonizing over what the "best" numbers would be.</blockquote>
I let ghosts pick for me... or God.
Heh... I think based on previous winners, they say the random "quick pick" has won the most jackpots so I go with the odds. Occasionally, if I have time, I'll pick my lucky numbers. I haven't personally played Lotto in quite a while but this next draw I'm going to bust the "8" theory out and see how it does.
What is the best scientific method of picking Lotto numbers?</blockquote>
There is no best way of picking since it's a random event. However, if you pick common "lucky" numbers the odds of sharing the price increase dramatically. Then again, it's still better to win and share than not to win at all. I've heard a bunch of "theories" on what picking strategy is best. My favorite is the claim that since the lottery is a random event, letting the machine pick will guarantee a better randomness to your numbers. Other people swear by the fact that if you play the same number over and over your odds increase over time. I've picked 1 2 3 4 5 + 6 and called a fool cause that kind of pattern wasn't random enough. Whatever floats your boat is fine when it comes to lottery.</blockquote>
I have collected 10 years worth of MEGA LOTTO numbers. The stat. analysis does show a consisent pattern with a band error of 3 numbers. I'm afraid though that it just isn't quite bit enought to be a consistent winner.
Anyways good luck
-bix</blockquote>
Likely variance due to the smallish sample size. In poker, the standard is 50K hands to get a true baseline and take out the noise (!).</blockquote>
Yes, the standard approved population for this size is 15,000 samples, i only have about 1200, nowhere near enough.
That is with the 99% confidence level. With a 95% it drops significantly, but i'm still many times too small of a population. As for any one strategy, well, the odds are so long, pretty much almost anything is better than none.
The biggest leap though is to play.
Don't play = infinitely no change of winning.
Play 1 = WAY better than infinitely none... :lol:
(but still prety minute)
Take it easy
-bix