nosuchreality
Well-known member
Is there a way to override kaos' giant red font?
What happened to the "Gold and the Dollar" thread?
- Thread starter Liar Loan
- Start date
NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
This intrigues me but I don't understand how it carries over to a price drop (I'm dumb that way)..
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/india-looking-at-leasing-gold-bought-from-imf/article5042403.ece
India looking at leasing gold bought from IMF
According to RBI sources, this gold was never brought into the country. It was just a book transfer.
Speaking at the India International Gold Convention in Jaipur last week, Gornall had said the RBI can organise a gold-dollar swap without divesting its holding or incurring any further interest charges.
?By swapping gold for a payable currency, you can benefit by having access to dollars for a period of your choice, while remaining a long-term holder of the gold, as the swap is a transfer of asset for a limited period. You will have bullion bank counter-party risk but this is successfully managed at the RBI, which has the strictest lending criteria of any central bank in the world,? Gornall had argued.
Most of the time, the counter party in a gold lease is a bullion bank. In order to answer your question I will ask a question, why would a bullion bank or any other party want to borrow gold? As in any lease, one party in a gold swap pays the other party a payment or periodic payments for the use of the lessor's gold. Why would anyone want to borrow someone's gold?
Correct, in order to sell it. And that is the only legitimate reason to become a lessee in a gold lease. If you can think of another one, you will be the first. Gold, except as money, is fairly useless, and costs money to store and insure. (Personally I think gold is one of the more boring assets to own; Southern California real estate being my favorite.) Except for very recently, the lessor usually pays the lessee for the lessee to borrow the gold because of the expense associated with holding gold.
The Bank of England sold 1200 tonnes of gold into the market in April and if you look at a chart, you can see what it did to the pog. When any entity sells a large amount of gold that was not previously for sale, the price goes down, just as with any other asset or commodity. BTW, the Bank of England only owned about 400 tonnes of gold.
You're next question may be, 'Where did the Bank of England get the other 800 tonnes of gold?' The Bank of England, like the Federal Reserve, keeps in it's possesion, gold belonging to other sovereign nations, such as France, Germany, etc., so that those countries have ready and available collateral for loans, (gold swaps). There are some who say that the Federal Reserve has leased out some or all of the USA's gold. Who knows? But, about a year or so ago, Germany requested, after the Federal Reseve refused to audit it's holdings, that the Federal Reserve return 300 tonnes of Germany's gold that it keeps at the Federal Reserve Depository in New York. The Federal Reserve did not deliver Germany's gold and instead told Germany that it would take 7 years before the Federal Reserve would return Germany's gold. Germany changed it's request to return it's gold in 7 years.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/afontev...d-from-ny-paris-in-case-of-a-currency-crisis/
Why would it take the Federal Reserve 7 years to return Germany's gold to Germany? Just askin'.
Why do both the Federal Reserve and the US federal government refuse do a physical audit of the USA's gold?
Oh yeah, if you look at the figures of the amount of physical gold that is sold every year for the past, I dunno, 30 years, you will see that for the first 20 or so years, the amount sold fairly equals the amount produced. But for the last 10 years, the total PHYSICAL gold sold has been larger that the total amount produced, (total including what they call scrap), especially in the last two or three years. Where did that extra gold come from? And please don't hold me to the exact number of years. I am typing off memory and I think you know how flawed that is.
More: For 39 days, the lease rate on gold has gone into backwardation. Normally, when a country leasses it's gold, it has to pay to do so, because it is expensive as heck to store and insure. For the last 39 days, gold in the hand is valued higher than gold six months from now. From my memory, GOFO had never been in backwardation for more than one or two days previously.
Speaking of Goldman Sachs:
Guess Which Bearish Bank bought a Record Amount of GLD in Q2
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-08-30/guess-which-bearish-bank-bought-record-amount-gld-q2
GOFO went positive today for the first day in 40.
India's central bank is denying that it is considering leasing out it's gold. If India's central bank is anything like our Federal Reserve, the denial is a sure bet that RBI will lease out it's gold soon.
So, ... what do the Chinese know? Are they stupid are something? And if the Chinese are importing, who is exporting? And where did that imported gold come from? Gold production has not increased in the last few years. Except for the last month, because of government import controls, India's imports have increased also. And how are the Chinese paying for all this gold? And what do they plan on doing with it? Are they planning on selling it when it is higher in price? Or what is Chinese culture in regards to gold ownership?
Chinese people love gold...it's a status symbol. Go to any Chinese jewelry store and you'll see lots of gold everywhere.
It makes sense for Chinese to owe in light of 1) the potential instability, 2) the capracious nature of the Chinese government and 3) it's a way to bypass the foreign investment cap that the CCP imposes.
No one is exporting...gold doesn't actually move...just the ownership of it. People in stable nations like US and in Europe are selling because they realize that the panic was uncalled for....sky not falling.
No one is exporting? Huh?!
If no one is exporting, and physical gold does not actually move, then how are China and India importing? Importing is not just some bookkeeping number being changed at a central bank or a commodities exchange. Importing is the actual movement of gold into China and India. People in India and China are buying physical gold that they take home or to a safe deposit box in a bank. When I post those charts of the decreasing number of registered ounces at the COMEX, those are real physical ounces leaving the COMEX. They aren't just paper ounces moved into the 'elegible' category. They are leaving. And actual physical ounces are leaving the LBMA on a consistent basis. It is not just the registered ounces that are decreasing, but the total is decreasing also and faster than just the registered ounces. I post the registered charts because those are the ounces backing up the futures sold on the COMEX. The elegible ounces are not allowed to be sold by the COMEX or by any broker of the COMEX unless they are changed to registered. Presently, there are 56 ounces sold for every registered ounce at the COMEX, and that is a historical high.
You are right that the sky is not falling, and who ever said it was? But the west has been sold a load of bs that their currency is valuable and their central banks can control economic rises and falls.
In the end: Gold down to to near $1,300...off $75 from Monday.
In the end? There is no more market for gold? Gold will not be for sale next week or next year? In the end? Your time frame for asset evalulation is five days? Nothing before Monday matters, or anything after today? In the end?
Up 200% since September 2005. In my world, as limited as that may be, September 13, 2013 is certainly not the end.
Nope...my time for evaluation is history...Gold is the ultimate speculation buy and a short term investment...not a longterm strategy. Gold is fun if you are contrarian and like to believe that you know more than everyone else but it's just not that appealing in a first world country.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickferri/2013/04/22/gold-bugs-swatted-again/
NASDAQ is up about 180% since September 2005 and close to 300% if you bought at the low in 2009.
Go figure..
Gold to fall to fresh lows on US recovery: Goldman
Goldman expects the gold price to fall to $1,050 in 2014 ? a fall of 20 percent from current prices.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/101039476
Make sense if the Fed is going to start tapering and believes in a recovery.
Hmm...bubble was caused by a number of factors including irrational belief in a commodity/good, removal of regulations, allowing private companies to package/minimize short term risk, as well as stagnant wages which resulted in middle class using their homes as piggybanks...there are also just a lot irresponsibility.
The US government spent the entire 1920s paying down debt and to contract the money supply...which resulted in...the GREAT DEPRESSION. We clearly contracted our way out of that one.
Japan contracted its way out of it's economic malaise of the 1990s.
European austerity measure clearly effective...EU is now in better shape than the US.
Pay no attention to China who pour tons of money into the country to make sure that growth continues despite significantly higher risk of inflation.
nosuchreality
Well-known member
I've noticed
awgeecdcrez
New member
"Gold commentary is, in general, not very well informed. And this is not just a statement on the talking heads from financial television. There are quite a few analysts and economists who act like they need to buy a vowel or two when it comes to the nature of money. Perhaps they can't help it; they talk and dress the game, but they don't have the soul to really play. They're just white boys lost in the blues"
Arthur Cutten
Arthur Cutten
morekaos
Well-known member
awgeecdcrez said:
This intrigues me but I don't understand how it carries over to a price drop (I'm dumb that way)..
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/india-looking-at-leasing-gold-bought-from-imf/article5042403.ece
India looking at leasing gold bought from IMF
According to RBI sources, this gold was never brought into the country. It was just a book transfer.
Speaking at the India International Gold Convention in Jaipur last week, Gornall had said the RBI can organise a gold-dollar swap without divesting its holding or incurring any further interest charges.
?By swapping gold for a payable currency, you can benefit by having access to dollars for a period of your choice, while remaining a long-term holder of the gold, as the swap is a transfer of asset for a limited period. You will have bullion bank counter-party risk but this is successfully managed at the RBI, which has the strictest lending criteria of any central bank in the world,? Gornall had argued.
awgeecdcrez
New member
morekaos said:
Most of the time, the counter party in a gold lease is a bullion bank. In order to answer your question I will ask a question, why would a bullion bank or any other party want to borrow gold? As in any lease, one party in a gold swap pays the other party a payment or periodic payments for the use of the lessor's gold. Why would anyone want to borrow someone's gold?
Correct, in order to sell it. And that is the only legitimate reason to become a lessee in a gold lease. If you can think of another one, you will be the first. Gold, except as money, is fairly useless, and costs money to store and insure. (Personally I think gold is one of the more boring assets to own; Southern California real estate being my favorite.) Except for very recently, the lessor usually pays the lessee for the lessee to borrow the gold because of the expense associated with holding gold.
The Bank of England sold 1200 tonnes of gold into the market in April and if you look at a chart, you can see what it did to the pog. When any entity sells a large amount of gold that was not previously for sale, the price goes down, just as with any other asset or commodity. BTW, the Bank of England only owned about 400 tonnes of gold.
You're next question may be, 'Where did the Bank of England get the other 800 tonnes of gold?' The Bank of England, like the Federal Reserve, keeps in it's possesion, gold belonging to other sovereign nations, such as France, Germany, etc., so that those countries have ready and available collateral for loans, (gold swaps). There are some who say that the Federal Reserve has leased out some or all of the USA's gold. Who knows? But, about a year or so ago, Germany requested, after the Federal Reseve refused to audit it's holdings, that the Federal Reserve return 300 tonnes of Germany's gold that it keeps at the Federal Reserve Depository in New York. The Federal Reserve did not deliver Germany's gold and instead told Germany that it would take 7 years before the Federal Reserve would return Germany's gold. Germany changed it's request to return it's gold in 7 years.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/afontev...d-from-ny-paris-in-case-of-a-currency-crisis/
Why would it take the Federal Reserve 7 years to return Germany's gold to Germany? Just askin'.
Why do both the Federal Reserve and the US federal government refuse do a physical audit of the USA's gold?
Oh yeah, if you look at the figures of the amount of physical gold that is sold every year for the past, I dunno, 30 years, you will see that for the first 20 or so years, the amount sold fairly equals the amount produced. But for the last 10 years, the total PHYSICAL gold sold has been larger that the total amount produced, (total including what they call scrap), especially in the last two or three years. Where did that extra gold come from? And please don't hold me to the exact number of years. I am typing off memory and I think you know how flawed that is.
More: For 39 days, the lease rate on gold has gone into backwardation. Normally, when a country leasses it's gold, it has to pay to do so, because it is expensive as heck to store and insure. For the last 39 days, gold in the hand is valued higher than gold six months from now. From my memory, GOFO had never been in backwardation for more than one or two days previously.
awgeecdcrez
New member
morekaos said:
Speaking of Goldman Sachs:
Guess Which Bearish Bank bought a Record Amount of GLD in Q2
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-08-30/guess-which-bearish-bank-bought-record-amount-gld-q2
GOFO went positive today for the first day in 40.
India's central bank is denying that it is considering leasing out it's gold. If India's central bank is anything like our Federal Reserve, the denial is a sure bet that RBI will lease out it's gold soon.
awgeecdcrez
New member
awgeecdcrez
New member
So, ... what do the Chinese know? Are they stupid are something? And if the Chinese are importing, who is exporting? And where did that imported gold come from? Gold production has not increased in the last few years. Except for the last month, because of government import controls, India's imports have increased also. And how are the Chinese paying for all this gold? And what do they plan on doing with it? Are they planning on selling it when it is higher in price? Or what is Chinese culture in regards to gold ownership?
awgeecdcrez
New member
Irvinecommuter
New member
awgeecdcrez said:
So, ... what do the Chinese know? Are they stupid are something? And if the Chinese are importing, who is exporting? And where did that imported gold come from? Gold production has not increased in the last few years. Except for the last month, because of government import controls, India's imports have increased also. And how are the Chinese paying for all this gold? And what do they plan on doing with it? Are they planning on selling it when it is higher in price? Or what is Chinese culture in regards to gold ownership?
Chinese people love gold...it's a status symbol. Go to any Chinese jewelry store and you'll see lots of gold everywhere.
It makes sense for Chinese to owe in light of 1) the potential instability, 2) the capracious nature of the Chinese government and 3) it's a way to bypass the foreign investment cap that the CCP imposes.
No one is exporting...gold doesn't actually move...just the ownership of it. People in stable nations like US and in Europe are selling because they realize that the panic was uncalled for....sky not falling.
awgeecdcrez
New member
Irvinecommuter said:
No one is exporting? Huh?!
If no one is exporting, and physical gold does not actually move, then how are China and India importing? Importing is not just some bookkeeping number being changed at a central bank or a commodities exchange. Importing is the actual movement of gold into China and India. People in India and China are buying physical gold that they take home or to a safe deposit box in a bank. When I post those charts of the decreasing number of registered ounces at the COMEX, those are real physical ounces leaving the COMEX. They aren't just paper ounces moved into the 'elegible' category. They are leaving. And actual physical ounces are leaving the LBMA on a consistent basis. It is not just the registered ounces that are decreasing, but the total is decreasing also and faster than just the registered ounces. I post the registered charts because those are the ounces backing up the futures sold on the COMEX. The elegible ounces are not allowed to be sold by the COMEX or by any broker of the COMEX unless they are changed to registered. Presently, there are 56 ounces sold for every registered ounce at the COMEX, and that is a historical high.
You are right that the sky is not falling, and who ever said it was? But the west has been sold a load of bs that their currency is valuable and their central banks can control economic rises and falls.
Irvinecommuter
New member
awgeecdcrez said:
In the end: Gold down to to near $1,300...off $75 from Monday.
awgeecdcrez
New member
Irvinecommuter said:
In the end? There is no more market for gold? Gold will not be for sale next week or next year? In the end? Your time frame for asset evalulation is five days? Nothing before Monday matters, or anything after today? In the end?
Up 200% since September 2005. In my world, as limited as that may be, September 13, 2013 is certainly not the end.
Irvinecommuter
New member
awgeecdcrez said:
Nope...my time for evaluation is history...Gold is the ultimate speculation buy and a short term investment...not a longterm strategy. Gold is fun if you are contrarian and like to believe that you know more than everyone else but it's just not that appealing in a first world country.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickferri/2013/04/22/gold-bugs-swatted-again/
NASDAQ is up about 180% since September 2005 and close to 300% if you bought at the low in 2009.
morekaos
Well-known member
awgeecdcrez said:
Go figure..
Gold to fall to fresh lows on US recovery: Goldman
Goldman expects the gold price to fall to $1,050 in 2014 ? a fall of 20 percent from current prices.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/101039476
Irvinecommuter
New member
morekaos said:
Make sense if the Fed is going to start tapering and believes in a recovery.
awgeecdcrez
New member
Well, ... it seems that I have done all I can.
So, I will leave you with these thoughts.
What caused the housing bubble? Or the Nasdaq bubble? Or the, (fill in the blank), bubble?
What have the world's central banks done as a result of the latest bubble bursting and the resultant financial mayhem?
If you conclude that the world's central banks are pursuing the same policies now that they did before the consequences, except this time they are pursuing those policies on a much grander scale, then what will be the consequence, if any? If the creation of too much debt was a problem, then the creation of ten times more debt will resolve previous problems?
Is everything gonna be just fine? It is different this time? The Federal Reserve and other central banks can create massive amounts of currency, (debt), without any consequence? Do you think Bernanke or whomever is smart enough to know how to slow down the artificial stimulus in a manner such that an economy built on ever expanding debt will continue to do all right?
I dunno, maybe you think that the financial problems were not created from too much debt? As the young people are want to say these days, "Good luck with that."
So, I will leave you with these thoughts.
What caused the housing bubble? Or the Nasdaq bubble? Or the, (fill in the blank), bubble?
What have the world's central banks done as a result of the latest bubble bursting and the resultant financial mayhem?
If you conclude that the world's central banks are pursuing the same policies now that they did before the consequences, except this time they are pursuing those policies on a much grander scale, then what will be the consequence, if any? If the creation of too much debt was a problem, then the creation of ten times more debt will resolve previous problems?
Is everything gonna be just fine? It is different this time? The Federal Reserve and other central banks can create massive amounts of currency, (debt), without any consequence? Do you think Bernanke or whomever is smart enough to know how to slow down the artificial stimulus in a manner such that an economy built on ever expanding debt will continue to do all right?
I dunno, maybe you think that the financial problems were not created from too much debt? As the young people are want to say these days, "Good luck with that."
Irvinecommuter
New member
awgeecdcrez said:
Hmm...bubble was caused by a number of factors including irrational belief in a commodity/good, removal of regulations, allowing private companies to package/minimize short term risk, as well as stagnant wages which resulted in middle class using their homes as piggybanks...there are also just a lot irresponsibility.
The US government spent the entire 1920s paying down debt and to contract the money supply...which resulted in...the GREAT DEPRESSION. We clearly contracted our way out of that one.
Japan contracted its way out of it's economic malaise of the 1990s.
European austerity measure clearly effective...EU is now in better shape than the US.
Pay no attention to China who pour tons of money into the country to make sure that growth continues despite significantly higher risk of inflation.