[quote author="awgee" date=1214490215][quote author="Johnny Fever" date=1214478946]awgee,
I guess maybe Im asking for too much. Of course I would rather pay less on the top end rather than some meager(in the long run kickback) but in this slow market Ive been told by many that aggressive offers and a % commision is very commonplace.
See, the last realtor we had kept telling us how he is such a great negotiator and that he would fight to get the deal done. Well, you know what, 6+ offers(different homes) later and only ONE counter. Now that is great negotiating eh? Am I missing something? So it really is hard to asses on the front end really how much the price can be dropped.
To answer the others:
Im looking in the Newp Coast area and have noted some people wanting to sell. Some actually are taking significant $$ off their asking prices and some are even in the 2004-5 range from what I can tell.
I am getting much pressure to buy b/c of a bun in the oven and wife. I personally do not want to buy just for those reasons but again in real life its hard to deny that pressure....honestly.
JF
FYI: NC is 7 miles b/w both of the major places that I work at so this area is attractive for many reasons...</blockquote>
IR2 - Weigh in on this, please.
Johnny - What I am proposing is forget what is commonplace and tricky and instead think of what is in your best interest.
Example 1: You offer $1,000,000 and get 2% back. You end up only paying $980,000 but pay interest, taxes, and closing costs on $1,000,000. The seller nets $940,000 or 94% of $1,000,000.
Example 2: You offer $980,000 and let the seller negotiate the commissions. After all, he has the contract with the commissions. You do not. He does not want to net $921,200 or 94% of $980,000, but as in the previous example, he will sell for a net of $940,000. Offer $980,000 and let the seller negotiate the 2% commission discount. You pay $980,000 and the seller nets $940,800, so the seller nets $800 more and you do not have to pay costs on the commissions paid, and you are not involved with kickbacks.
Make your offer with the idea of a commission discount in mind, but leave the seller's contract negotiations with the seller. The seller is paying the commission, so my guess is that there is something unethical with the agent paying a kickback of commission that the seller contracted for.
Or better yet, contract with a buyer's agent on a fee basis, so that the agent is working for you. Contract to pay him, not the seller. If the buyer is getting his commission from the seller, you can argue until you are blue in the face, but reality is that the agent works for the party who is paying him and who he is contracted to get paid from.
<strong>It seems that most folks find their own home these days and they just need some help writing an offer and countering. Once the deal gets to escrow, there is very little for a buyer's agent to do. </strong>An agent with whom you have contracted and gets no commission from closure has no motivation to encourage you to close a deal or pay more than you want. A buyer's agent who only gets paid if the deal closes, has as his first priority a closed deal, whether it is in your best interest or not.</blockquote>
Amen Awgee, preach on brotha man! You got it right, I do agree that buyer agents shouldn't be paid what they get paid because it fogs up their judgement due to the $$$$$ signs in their heads.
I like your 2nd example, but there's one problem with it. Most sellers will not look to re-negotiate the commission with their listing agents after the offer because the listing agents have an incentive not to come up with a creative idea like that. Trust me, most listing agents would be crying like a baby if their sellers come back to them to try to re-negotiate their commission, probably telling the sellers how much "work" they've done and how they can't offer the same level of services with a reduced level of commission. haha I swear, the DRE needs to due two things...one is to impliment a fixed fee structure for commission (that'll never happen because the NAR would never allow for that) and two is to require people to at least have a college degree, along with more required real estate courses, before they can get their RE licenses.
As a fellow CPA license holder, the difficulty of obtaining a CPA license is one of the things that brings the level of respect one gets actually have it.