sgip
Well-known member
Working with $4m per acre, it's still possible to build at a $2m or so price point. The original listed home says "3,300 SF", but my guess is that because the 500 sf basement is permitted, the actual footprint of the home is about 2,800 SF. The garage is 1,110 SF, but could be shrunk from 4 cars to 3. Let's say that puts the garage footprint at 900 SF. Total land use for buildings is then 3,700 SF. Move the lot sizes from 10,000 to 9,000 and things improve while still having what is considered an "oversized" lot in Irvine. A $4m per acre price should include infrastructure. Not sure what acreage within OH or 5 Points Great Park might run, but if purchased today, you've got most of the built ins already.
Given construction material differences between a 1900 era home (wood, plaster) and a 2017 build with different materials, the cost to build won't be as great. There is a terrific amount of "gingerbread" on the original property - shingles, trim pieces, which while costly if 100% wood, can be softened up a bit while still maintaining the historical look of these kinds of designs. Since options are often a significant revenue center, depending on the level of customization a buyer wants the "gingerbreading" of a home like this could be very profitable. That is a great incentive then to build something like this. Many buyers pay outside contractors to improve the interior of the home. The builder could almost exclusively improve the detailed exterior of these homes at point of sale.
Let's say cost to build a 3,700 SF dwelling is $250 PSF - generous because a basement to dig out isn't much, and a detached garage is very, very cheap to build. $925k to build, $1m for land (4 units per acre at 9,000 SF lots) and you're in the $2-2.25m price range.
Assuming functional floorplans, I'd rather live in a $2.25m unique home than a $3m Faux Tuscan-ish box. How about you?
My .02c
Given construction material differences between a 1900 era home (wood, plaster) and a 2017 build with different materials, the cost to build won't be as great. There is a terrific amount of "gingerbread" on the original property - shingles, trim pieces, which while costly if 100% wood, can be softened up a bit while still maintaining the historical look of these kinds of designs. Since options are often a significant revenue center, depending on the level of customization a buyer wants the "gingerbreading" of a home like this could be very profitable. That is a great incentive then to build something like this. Many buyers pay outside contractors to improve the interior of the home. The builder could almost exclusively improve the detailed exterior of these homes at point of sale.
Let's say cost to build a 3,700 SF dwelling is $250 PSF - generous because a basement to dig out isn't much, and a detached garage is very, very cheap to build. $925k to build, $1m for land (4 units per acre at 9,000 SF lots) and you're in the $2-2.25m price range.
Assuming functional floorplans, I'd rather live in a $2.25m unique home than a $3m Faux Tuscan-ish box. How about you?
My .02c