ThirtySomethingWEquity
Active member
Liar Loan said:irvinehomeowner said:Mety said:irvinehomeowner said:Mety said:Looking at the price history, it?s getting 90 to almost 100% ROI in about 10 years. I say that?s not bad at all. Even the ?close to bottom of least desirable villages in Irvine? gets you that kind of fortune.
So what you're saying is it's always good to buy in Irvine.
Irvine is a good place to buy for its good ROI and also many people enjoy its amenities as well. To live is a completely different story so I?m not bringing that up. Everyone has different tastes and opinions so I totally understand some people just not liking the city. However, you can?t deny it?s a good place to invest. Maybe it?s different for $2m+ homes, but for ?moderate? 2,3, or even 4 bed homes, Irvine probably will give you the best ROI compare to nearby cities.
Not according to Liar "I love Irvine" Loan.
It depends on what point in the cycle you buy. A peak market purchase like CareBears made will probably decline less than a comparable home in Santa Ana, but conversely, a purchase at the bottom of the RE cycle in Santa Ana would provide higher returns on both a cash flow and appreciation basis compared to Irvine during the next up cycle.
please define terms for shit talking. Are you talking about comparably priced or median priced, are we talking absolute dollars or percentage for putting 20% or what?
Also, where do you live?