President Trump

[Irvinecommuter]

Trump said the unemployment rate was fake, not jobless claims

Are you serious? Trump uses the same bls number that has always been reported. Either it is and always was fake or it's not. It sounds like you need to take a long media free vacation to clear your head and get back to rational thinking.

We are talking about Trump's prior statements.  I personally have no issue with the unemployment calculation.  Perhaps it is you who is acting irrationally at this moment?

 

[Liar Loan]

I'm not making an argument, so by definition, it can't be a strawman.  Nice try I guess.

You guys are upset at things Trump has said in the past and projecting it onto me.  Trump making an argument is not the same as me making an argument.

 

[Irvinecommuter]

I'm not making an argument, so by definition, it can't be a strawman.  Nice try I guess.

You guys are upset at things Trump has said in the past and projecting it onto me.  Trump making an argument is not the same as me making an argument.

No one is projecting it on you...you are the one who is pretend Trump is a competent president by using data that Trump himself disparaged while ignoring 95% of the issues that Trump has created in the economy:  Tax cuts and trade wars just before the end of a boom cycle and increasing inflation. 

I mean Trump trying to be Hebert Hoover 2.0 would be hilarious if not for the serious harm it will have on this country.

 

[Liar Loan]

I'm not making an argument, so by definition, it can't be a strawman.  Nice try I guess.

You guys are upset at things Trump has said in the past and projecting it onto me.  Trump making an argument is not the same as me making an argument.

No one is projecting it on you...you are the one who is pretend Trump is a competent president by using data that Trump himself disparaged while ignoring 95% of the issues that Trump has created in the economy:  Tax cuts and trade wars just before the end of a boom cycle and increasing inflation. 

I mean Trump trying to be Hebert Hoover 2.0 would be hilarious if not for the serious harm it will have on this country.

My original post was in relation to jobless claims.  You're upset about the unemployment rate, a completely different calculation.  He didn't disparage jobless claims, so your argument against the unemployment rate is the strawman.  It has nothing to do with the original topic, which is that jobless claims are at a 49-year low.

 

[Irvinecommuter]

I'm not making an argument, so by definition, it can't be a strawman.  Nice try I guess.

You guys are upset at things Trump has said in the past and projecting it onto me.  Trump making an argument is not the same as me making an argument.

No one is projecting it on you...you are the one who is pretend Trump is a competent president by using data that Trump himself disparaged while ignoring 95% of the issues that Trump has created in the economy:  Tax cuts and trade wars just before the end of a boom cycle and increasing inflation. 

I mean Trump trying to be Hebert Hoover 2.0 would be hilarious if not for the serious harm it will have on this country.

My original post was in relation to jobless claims.  You're upset about the unemployment rate, a completely different calculation.  He didn't disparage jobless claims, so your argument against the unemployment rate is the strawman.  It has nothing to do with the original topic, which is that jobless claims are at a 49-year low.

No...I actually addressed both issues.  You just ignore one and latched on to the other for no reason other than to ignore the point of both. 

 

[Liar Loan]

I'm not making an argument, so by definition, it can't be a strawman.  Nice try I guess.

You guys are upset at things Trump has said in the past and projecting it onto me.  Trump making an argument is not the same as me making an argument.

No one is projecting it on you...you are the one who is pretend Trump is a competent president by using data that Trump himself disparaged while ignoring 95% of the issues that Trump has created in the economy:  Tax cuts and trade wars just before the end of a boom cycle and increasing inflation. 

I mean Trump trying to be Hebert Hoover 2.0 would be hilarious if not for the serious harm it will have on this country.

My original post was in relation to jobless claims.  You're upset about the unemployment rate, a completely different calculation.  He didn't disparage jobless claims, so your argument against the unemployment rate is the strawman.  It has nothing to do with the original topic, which is that jobless claims are at a 49-year low.

No...I actually addressed both issues.  You just ignore one and latched on to the other for no reason other than to ignore the point of both.

I stated what I believe about the unemployment rate, which doesn't align with Trump's view at all.  You should be happy with that, but you and Loco wanted so much to pounce on me that it went right over your heads.  Better luck next time guys.

 

[Irvinecommuter]

I'm not making an argument, so by definition, it can't be a strawman.  Nice try I guess.

You guys are upset at things Trump has said in the past and projecting it onto me.  Trump making an argument is not the same as me making an argument.

No one is projecting it on you...you are the one who is pretend Trump is a competent president by using data that Trump himself disparaged while ignoring 95% of the issues that Trump has created in the economy:  Tax cuts and trade wars just before the end of a boom cycle and increasing inflation. 

I mean Trump trying to be Hebert Hoover 2.0 would be hilarious if not for the serious harm it will have on this country.

My original post was in relation to jobless claims.  You're upset about the unemployment rate, a completely different calculation.  He didn't disparage jobless claims, so your argument against the unemployment rate is the strawman.  It has nothing to do with the original topic, which is that jobless claims are at a 49-year low.

No...I actually addressed both issues.  You just ignore one and latched on to the other for no reason other than to ignore the point of both.

I stated what I believe about the unemployment rate, which doesn't align with Trump's view at all.  You should be happy with that, but you and Loco wanted so much to pounce on me that it went right over your heads.  Better luck next time guys.

We are not talking about you...we are talking about the flaming wreck of a con man that we have as the president.

 

[Liar Loan]

I'm not making an argument, so by definition, it can't be a strawman.  Nice try I guess.

You guys are upset at things Trump has said in the past and projecting it onto me.  Trump making an argument is not the same as me making an argument.

No one is projecting it on you...you are the one who is pretend Trump is a competent president by using data that Trump himself disparaged while ignoring 95% of the issues that Trump has created in the economy:  Tax cuts and trade wars just before the end of a boom cycle and increasing inflation. 

I mean Trump trying to be Hebert Hoover 2.0 would be hilarious if not for the serious harm it will have on this country.

My original post was in relation to jobless claims.  You're upset about the unemployment rate, a completely different calculation.  He didn't disparage jobless claims, so your argument against the unemployment rate is the strawman.  It has nothing to do with the original topic, which is that jobless claims are at a 49-year low.

No...I actually addressed both issues.  You just ignore one and latched on to the other for no reason other than to ignore the point of both.

I stated what I believe about the unemployment rate, which doesn't align with Trump's view at all.  You should be happy with that, but you and Loco wanted so much to pounce on me that it went right over your heads.  Better luck next time guys.

We are not talking about you...we are talking about the flaming wreck of a con man that we have as the president.

That's what I said earlier, that we were talking about Trump's statements, and you posted that silly strawman meme.  Oh well, Trump Derangement Syndrome runs strongly in you.

 

[irvinehomeowner]

I say we battle royale it in a cage match.

IC might have the advantage if he's Asian... but I think I have size/weight advantage on all of you combined.

#RaceAdvantage

#RacistAdvantage

#KingOfTheTICage

 

[Irvinecommuter]

MORE BEST PEOPLE!

White House chief of staff John Kelly continued to misrepresent his handling of the dismissal of former top aide Rob Porter on Friday, defiantly obfuscating on exactly what he knew -- and when -- about the extent of the abuse allegations against Porter's two ex-wives. In some instances, Kelly even directly contradicted some of the White House's public statements delivered last month.

In a rare gathering with reporters in his White House office, Kelly mostly defended his own conduct and insisted that he never considered resigning over the fallout. Porter's two ex-wives accused President Donald Trump's former staff secretary of years of relentless verbal, emotional and physical domestic abuse -- all of which Porter denied.

"I have absolutely nothing to even consider resigning over," Kelly said, even as he acknowledged that senior White House aides "didn't cover ourselves in glory" in how they responded to the scandal.

But Kelly's explanation did not fully comport with CNN's extensive reporting on the Porter scandal.
The new timeline presented by Kelly doesn't conform with what Kelly told a roomful of White House staffers at the end of the grueling week when Porter left the White House

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/02/politics/john-kelly-rob-porter-abuse/index.html

 

[Irvinecommuter]

Best people!  Good luck with the contempt of court and search warrants!

Washington (CNN)In a defiant pair of CNN interviews, former Trump campaign aide Sam Nunberg said Monday he refuses to comply with a grand jury subpoena in the Russia investigation.

"Screw that," Nunberg told CNN's Gloria Borger. "Why do I have to go? Why? For what?"

And in a separate interview with CNN's Jake Tapper, Nunberg said he blamed the investigation's existence on President Donald Trump's firing of James Comey as FBI director -- including an interview where Trump said he was thinking about the Russia investigation when he fired Comey and the fact that he held a meeting with top Russian officials in the Oval Office.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/05/politics/sam-nunberg-robert-mueller/index.html

 

[Kings]

Best people!  Good luck with the contempt of court and search warrants!

Washington (CNN)In a defiant pair of CNN interviews, former Trump campaign aide Sam Nunberg said Monday he refuses to comply with a grand jury subpoena in the Russia investigation.

"Screw that," Nunberg told CNN's Gloria Borger. "Why do I have to go? Why? For what?"

And in a separate interview with CNN's Jake Tapper, Nunberg said he blamed the investigation's existence on President Donald Trump's firing of James Comey as FBI director -- including an interview where Trump said he was thinking about the Russia investigation when he fired Comey and the fact that he held a meeting with top Russian officials in the Oval Office.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/05/politics/sam-nunberg-robert-mueller/index.html

You can certainly object to a subpoena or move to quash.

 

[Irvinecommuter]

Best people!  Good luck with the contempt of court and search warrants!

Washington (CNN)In a defiant pair of CNN interviews, former Trump campaign aide Sam Nunberg said Monday he refuses to comply with a grand jury subpoena in the Russia investigation.

"Screw that," Nunberg told CNN's Gloria Borger. "Why do I have to go? Why? For what?"

And in a separate interview with CNN's Jake Tapper, Nunberg said he blamed the investigation's existence on President Donald Trump's firing of James Comey as FBI director -- including an interview where Trump said he was thinking about the Russia investigation when he fired Comey and the fact that he held a meeting with top Russian officials in the Oval Office.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/05/politics/sam-nunberg-robert-mueller/index.html

You can certainly object to a subpoena or move to quash.

You certainly can but you need good grounds and Nunberg basically told the world that he just doesn't think that he should have too.  Would have been easier had he just pled the 5th.

 

[Irvinecommuter]

LOL Wilbur Ross.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrVADC083xk

 

[Irvinecommuter]

We are going to run of jail space!

Special counsel Robert Mueller?s team is looking into incidents involving one of President Trump?s attornies as part of the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, The Washington Post reported Tuesday.

Mueller has reportedly sought documents and spoken to witnesses about Michael Cohen?s involvement in negotiations to build a Trump Tower in Moscow. Cohen was reportedly in contact with Russian President Vladimir Putin?s chief spokesman about moving forward on the project, but did not receive a response.

Negotiations for a deal to build a Trump Tower in Moscow started in 2015, but were cut off in early 2016.

Mueller?s team has also looked into Cohen?s involvement in a peace deal between Russia and the Ukraine that favored Russia and was proposed one week after Trump took office, The Washington Post reported.

http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...ocuments-on-incidents-involving-trumps-lawyer

 

[eyephone]

Trump?s top economic advisor Gary Cohen is out.

 

[eyephone]

The rumor is true? Chaos in the WH?

(According to many articles)

 

[rkp]

The rumor is true? Chaos in the WH?

(According to many articles)

Confirmed:https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/06/us/politics/gary-cohn-resigns.html

 

[Kings]

The rumor is true? Chaos in the WH?

(According to many articles)

If the white house is always in chaos, is it really in chaos?

 

[Irvinecommuter]

CHAOS ALL THE TIME!

President Trump has allowed former communications director Anthony Scaramucci to continue his recent spate of attacks on chief of staff John Kelly, CNN reported Tuesday.

A source told the network that Trump has not discouraged Scaramucci?s from going on the offensive against Kelly in a series of recent interviews.

Scaramucci has in recent weeks been critical of Kelly for his handling of domestic abuse allegations against former White House staff secretary Rob Porter. Kelly defended Porter even after allegations he physically abused his ex-wives were made public.

http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...dened-scaramucci-to-attack-kelly-on-tv-report