Petaluma at Eastwood
- Thread starter MYOB
- Start date
NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
I would prefer a lot at current Petaluma location that are more inner, farther away from Irvine Blvd than the extension site.
We have a cell tower put up in CV about a year after the village opened, see CV cell tower discussion here. And one TI member post a link for an interesting read from American Cancer Soiciey regarding to cell tower. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancercauses/othercarcinogens/athome/cellular-phone-towers
From what I have read, you want to be at least a 1/4 mile away from cell towers to be safe.
At the end of the day, cell tower studies are conflicting. Until there are concrete evidence and studies, why would anyone want to put their family at risk of cancer?
A lot of these buyers overlook cell towers at Eastwood, contamination at Beacon Park and get caught up in the hype of Irvine. So sad.
Jasmine was selling very fast too but it does looks like Petaluma is selling even better. Petaluma also has lot of good attribute over Jasmine, farther away from freeway, zoned to Northwood High instead of Irvine High and improve floor plan etc.
If I'm in the market for something like this, I would jump on it right away.
acf said:
I would prefer a lot at current Petaluma location that are more inner, farther away from Irvine Blvd than the extension site.
We have a cell tower put up in CV about a year after the village opened, see CV cell tower discussion here. And one TI member post a link for an interesting read from American Cancer Soiciey regarding to cell tower. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancercauses/othercarcinogens/athome/cellular-phone-towers
ChasingRainbows
Member
Phase 1: 9 homes all sold
Phase 2: 5 homes sold, 1 didn't have a sold button yet (residence 1)
Base property tax: 1.05%
AD tax: $1,150 / year
CFD tax: $1,700 / year
Other taxes: $164 / year
Overall effective tax rate: ~1.4%
Eastwood HOA: $125 / month
Phase 2: 5 homes sold, 1 didn't have a sold button yet (residence 1)
Base property tax: 1.05%
AD tax: $1,150 / year
CFD tax: $1,700 / year
Other taxes: $164 / year
Overall effective tax rate: ~1.4%
Eastwood HOA: $125 / month
usctrojancpa
Well-known member
San Mateo was the best selling tract at Stonegate (3 phases) and it's safe to assume that Petaluma will be the best selling tract in Eastwood. I wouldn't be surprised if you get a 3rd phase of Petaluma. I don't think Marin will sell that well.
So "if" the cell tower is not dangerous given the studies shown (Although I have googled other studies that say otherwise), can we all agree that Petaluma II built on lot 8 or 9 is better than the current Petaluma I location near Irvine blvd?
Edit: I guess it depends if Petaluma II is located right next to Jeffery road, or more to the inside of the community. Thoughts?
Edit: I guess it depends if Petaluma II is located right next to Jeffery road, or more to the inside of the community. Thoughts?
fishfinder333
New member
acf said:
From what I have read, you want to be at least a 1/4 mile away from cell towers to be safe.
At the end of the day, cell tower studies are conflicting. Until there are concrete evidence and studies, why would anyone want to put their family at risk of cancer?
A lot of these buyers overlook cell towers at Eastwood, contamination at Beacon Park and get caught up in the hype of Irvine. So sad.
Cornflakes
Active member
What kind of waves do those cell towers put out? What is the chain of events that happen when those waves hit human body that ultimately yield cancer in some people?
soyi said:
Jasmine was selling very fast too but it does looks like Petaluma is selling even better. Petaluma also has lot of good attribute over Jasmine, farther away from freeway, zoned to Northwood High instead of Irvine High and improve floor plan etc.
If I'm in the market for something like this, I would jump on it right away.