[quote author="trrenter" date=1245105959]
<strong>Statistics of Births to unwed Parents. Are you saying that all of these people are bad parents?</strong></blockquote>
If their children are teenagers when they fabricate other children? Absolutely. Total epic failure as parents.
[quote author="trrenter" date=1245107804]I wasn't making a point for you but against you. The press love the Obama's even before President Obama got elected Michelle was gracing the covers of magazines. She is just like Nancy Reagan was. The press eats her up.</blockquote>
Only because they remembered the lesson of what happens to a strong woman al la Hillary.
<blockquote>Rush is far right media. The American public will not hear rush or see his website at a grocery store like they see these magazines.
It isn't the Whitehouse doing anything these magazines love Michelle.</blockquote>
<a href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=14676">Because, you know, nobody in the Far Right media would ever do anything to hurt a sitting first lady.</a>
<blockquote>Let me quote from the opening lines of the report: "'The Communication Stream of Conspiracy Commerce' refers to the mode of communication employed by the right wing to convey their fringe stories into legitimate subjects of coverage by the mainstream media. This is how the stream works. First, well-funded right-wing think tanks and individuals underwrite conservative newsletters and newspapers such as the Western Journalism Center, the American Spectator and the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. Next the stories are reprinted on the Internet where they are bounced all over the world. From the Internet, the stories are bounced into the mainstream media through one of two ways: 1) The story will be picked up by the British tabloids and covered as a major story, from which the American right-of-center mainstream media (i.e. the Wall Street Journal, Washington Times and New York Post) will then pick the story up; or 2) The story will be bounced directly from the Internet to the right-of-center mainstream American media. After the mainstream right-of-center American media covers the story, congressional committees will look into the story. After Congress looks into the story, the story now has the legitimacy to be covered by the remainder of the American mainstream press as a 'real' story." </blockquote>
<a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200509210002">Hillary had Vince Foster killed.</a>
<blockquote>On the September 19 and 20 broadcasts of his nationally syndicated radio show, Rush Limbaugh resurrected his scurrilous suggestion that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) had then-deputy White House counsel Vincent Foster murdered while she was first lady. Media Matters for America has documented previous instances (here and here) of Limbaugh insinuating that the Clintons were involved in the death of Foster, who committed suicide in Northern Virginia's Fort Marcy Park on July 20, 1993</blockquote>
<a href="http://www.slate.com/id/1002023/">Do the Clinton's run Murder Inc?</a>
<blockquote>Lists of supposed Clinton victims have circulated on the Internet web for the past few years. (Click here to see one list.) The lists may have originated with The Clinton Chronicles, a video produced in 1993 and since hawked by conservatives such as Pat Robertson, Rush Limbaugh, and Jerry Falwell. The Chronicles explain that as governor of Arkansas, Bill Clinton supervised a drug-smuggling and money-laundering enterprise that stretched from Central America to the Reagan-administration's CIA to west Arkansas. The video alleges that eight people were killed because they knew too much about the operation.</blockquote>
You are right. The Obama's got NOTHING to worry about. It's not like the keywords "Obama Muslim Socialist" doesn't get 1,240,000 hits on Google or something.
