Nude_IHB
New member
[quote author="EvaLSeraphim" date=1225975637][quote author="no_vaseline" date=1225973849]Dick Morris just savaged Rhom Emmanual as "a horrible choice".</blockquote>
I have long figured that if you don't know what to do, do the opposite of what Dick Morris suggests.
I'm hearing various pros and cons as to Emanuel. He might be ok. He will be a pit bull when his boss wants him to be, and can be kept behind closed doors otherwise. I think it's much harder to take someone more milquetoast, snap your fingers, and have them be a pit bull.
But I'm hearing so many conflicting things, I really don't know if it would be a good pick or not.</blockquote>
From a purely executive standpoint, it's a very shrewd pick. It gives him someone with massive D.C. experience, a direct pipeline to the Clinton machine via someone they trust, and with a solid working relationship with the current House leadership. As long as he's on the same page as Obama, I think it's a solid choice and will go a long way towards avoiding the problems Clinton ran into in his first year.
I have long figured that if you don't know what to do, do the opposite of what Dick Morris suggests.
I'm hearing various pros and cons as to Emanuel. He might be ok. He will be a pit bull when his boss wants him to be, and can be kept behind closed doors otherwise. I think it's much harder to take someone more milquetoast, snap your fingers, and have them be a pit bull.
But I'm hearing so many conflicting things, I really don't know if it would be a good pick or not.</blockquote>
From a purely executive standpoint, it's a very shrewd pick. It gives him someone with massive D.C. experience, a direct pipeline to the Clinton machine via someone they trust, and with a solid working relationship with the current House leadership. As long as he's on the same page as Obama, I think it's a solid choice and will go a long way towards avoiding the problems Clinton ran into in his first year.