Northpark Flip: 2 Malibu
- Thread starter iacrenter
- Start date
NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
I'm gonna pull a jumpcut and post a video! Love this guy:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zulEMWj3sVA
Perfect, so then you're saying if those details are included, which according to your body of context is the "bad credit/business deals posted from third party experience" then the chance of landing that job would be a definite zero?
Btw, UCLA sucks and I fail to see how the example of Alexander W. applies in this situation. Unless you're 1) making an irrelevant point that every graduate from UCLA must be exact copies of some girl that attended the same school and posted a video on the internet or 2) trying to get personal with meh. Surely you're not doing neither of the 2, are you?
I also don't care much for the high-fives or thrive off of any good or bad responses from others. Although, that's hard to resist, isn't it?
My screen name could have been anything, isn't it? I could very well live in Glendora and join TI with screen names such as IrvineRanchResident, IrvineOwner etc.,
TustinRanchResident is just my TI persona. You can take a dig at it (like your usual), as if I care.
For me its simple, make the discussion constructive so that everyone can benefit and with out making others feel unimportant.
ALMOST didn't notice your hidden insult to TustinRanchResident in your response to my post.
Shame on you, tsk tsk tsk.
Haha, negative ghost rider.
Good memory (or possibly search), but you missed "could" in my remark there.
Hilarious.
Is it possible that ID passed you up, since he has nada on your counter and...just replied by piggy-back (am I waking up internet bully from slumber?) on bones' comment that has nothing to do with point in question?
I like Homer's poster better!
traceimage
New member
IndieDev said:Am I missing something here? I know I didn't go to the same esteemed educational institution that brought the world Alexandra Wallace, but I didn't think this particular issue would be that hard to comprehend.
I'm gonna pull a jumpcut and post a video! Love this guy:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zulEMWj3sVA
ucla bruin
New member
IndieDev said:ucla bruin said:
But you separated that statement from the body of my post where I specifically stated the "details" which included an individual that had bad credit/business deals posted from third party experience:
IndieDev said:
So yes, if you take my post out of context, then your conclusion... does it really matter?
Am I missing something here? I know I didn't go to the same esteemed educational institution that brought the world Alexandra Wallace, but I didn't think this particular issue would be that hard to comprehend.
But hey, as long as you keep following me, you'll at least get cyber high fives from people like "TustinRanch-wish-I-could-live-Irvine-Resident", and maybe Starlight East.
Perfect, so then you're saying if those details are included, which according to your body of context is the "bad credit/business deals posted from third party experience" then the chance of landing that job would be a definite zero?
Btw, UCLA sucks and I fail to see how the example of Alexander W. applies in this situation. Unless you're 1) making an irrelevant point that every graduate from UCLA must be exact copies of some girl that attended the same school and posted a video on the internet or 2) trying to get personal with meh. Surely you're not doing neither of the 2, are you?
I also don't care much for the high-fives or thrive off of any good or bad responses from others. Although, that's hard to resist, isn't it?
IndieDev said:
My screen name could have been anything, isn't it? I could very well live in Glendora and join TI with screen names such as IrvineRanchResident, IrvineOwner etc.,
TustinRanchResident is just my TI persona. You can take a dig at it (like your usual), as if I care.
For me its simple, make the discussion constructive so that everyone can benefit and with out making others feel unimportant.
ucla bruin
New member
IndieDev said:
ALMOST didn't notice your hidden insult to TustinRanchResident in your response to my post.
Shame on you, tsk tsk tsk.
ucla bruin
New member
IndieDev said:
Haha, negative ghost rider.
irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
Hey guys... stop using Indie's own light saber against him:
ucla bruin
New member
I hate reiterating but here it is.
Could it be that you don't "defend" because you choose to ignore? Because I'm pretty sure there was at least 1 question in there that warranted a response. Unless you're choosing not to respond, which is totally fine too since that's what it seems like so far.
Could it be that you don't "defend" because you choose to ignore? Because I'm pretty sure there was at least 1 question in there that warranted a response. Unless you're choosing not to respond, which is totally fine too since that's what it seems like so far.
ucla bruin said:IndieDev said:ucla bruin said:
But you separated that statement from the body of my post where I specifically stated the "details" which included an individual that had bad credit/business deals posted from third party experience:
IndieDev said:
So yes, if you take my post out of context, then your conclusion... does it really matter?
Am I missing something here? I know I didn't go to the same esteemed educational institution that brought the world Alexandra Wallace, but I didn't think this particular issue would be that hard to comprehend.
But hey, as long as you keep following me, you'll at least get cyber high fives from people like "TustinRanch-wish-I-could-live-Irvine-Resident", and maybe Starlight East.
Perfect, so then you're saying if those details are included, which according to your body of context is the "bad credit/business deals posted from third party experience" then the chance of landing that job would be a definite zero?
Btw, UCLA sucks and I fail to see how the example of Alexander W. applies in this situation. Unless you're 1) making an irrelevant point that every graduate from UCLA must be exact copies of some girl that attended the same school and posted a video on the internet or 2) trying to get personal with meh. Surely you're not doing neither of the 2, are you?
I also don't care much for the high-fives or thrive off of any good or bad responses from others. Although, that's hard to resist, isn't it?
usctrojancpa
Well-known member
Wow, you guys are still at it? haha
ucla bruin
New member
^Didn't see that either, now that just sounds like elementary school talk. I thought you're better than this, Indie!
ucla bruin
New member
You passed me up yet again. I feel neglected. Or did you decide to ignore me because I was right and someone else (shh) was not?
Could it be? Have it done the IMPOSSIBLE? I don't dare say what it is because it's ludicrous to even think such thoughts.
Could it be? Have it done the IMPOSSIBLE? I don't dare say what it is because it's ludicrous to even think such thoughts.
homer_simpson
Well-known member
Just going to leave this here 
if anyone finds this offensive, i'll remove it
if anyone finds this offensive, i'll remove it
bones said:
Good memory (or possibly search), but you missed "could" in my remark there.
ucla bruin said:
Hilarious.
Is it possible that ID passed you up, since he has nada on your counter and...just replied by piggy-back (am I waking up internet bully from slumber?) on bones' comment that has nothing to do with point in question?
I like Homer's poster better!
You know, whatever happened with this bet? I was following it for a little while, but forgot about it... then I guess Indy probably just gave up.
Don't forget. I was the receiver of this infamous quote from NonFCB:
"You are just a whining loser here hoping that Irvine house price can be 50% off so that you can afford a house here." - NonFCB
Don't forget. I was the receiver of this infamous quote from NonFCB:
"You are just a whining loser here hoping that Irvine house price can be 50% off so that you can afford a house here." - NonFCB
usctrojancpa
Well-known member
And that was the funniest part of it all.frank69m said: