$3M+ homes being sold in Eastwood now!:
Is it one of the Palermo or Padova homes at the Groves in OH which have really small backyards?
Funny you should post this. We went to the open house for 17 Butler on Sunday. Nicely staged with a good amount of foot traffic. It's not a tear down like some of the other units that have transacted in the chancellor tract or the Mann "4bd" one for sale currently as well. Great neighborhood, I agree, but the amounts people are paying for teardown lots seem to be growing with no end in sight.
This $2m listing is a being marketed as a tear-down. Most of the pictures in the listing are 3d renderings and plans for a "shovel ready opportunity"I've not driven the area in a while. Are these being torn down and rebuilt or simply rehabbed?
Looks like it's off market as of today. The redfin pics are down but if anyone is curious, Zillow pics is still up:
17 Butler St, Irvine, CA 92612 | Zillow
17 Butler St, Irvine CA, is a Single Family home that contains 1684 sq ft and was built in 1965.It contains 3 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms.This home last sold for $1,575,000 in February 2024. The Rent Zestimate for this Single Family is $4,964/mo, which has increased by $4,964/mo in the last 30 days.www.zillow.com
It's 5300 sq ft lot, so if someone wants to do a teardown and rebuild they have land to play with. My in-law's in Lakewood has a house on about 6,000 sq ft lot, they did a "Studs-Out Remodel" where the house is tore down to the frame and rebuilt at cost of ~$300K just before the pandemic. The contractor took care to maintain the neighborhood appearance from street side.
In case of 17 Butler, I'd point to the remodeled (rebuilt) home at 31 Butler:
The investor who bought it in 2016 for $750K probably did a complete teardown and build, then flipped it in 2017 for $2.3 million. I don't know how much it'd cost to build a house like that these days, or if buying the house at $1.4 mil for a teardown & rebuild would be profitable today. Need someone more familiar with construction costs in 2024 to chime in.
I don't really have a chance to regret not buying a view lot instead. The priority list was long when Cielo was still under Irvine Pacific, so we had no chance at all getting a view lot because everyone wanted a view lot. After Shea took over, the first few phases (7-12) are all non view lots. It would be too long a wait for view lots.Money is being pulled out of China and it has to go somewhere…
CalBears timed it perfectly…buying a new build in todays price and by the time he moves into Cielo both Cielo and resale Bluffs will increase the values significantly…he may regret not paying up and buy a view lot instead. his advantage over FCBs is he can talk to sales people regularly and befriend them to get in early
I'm pretty sure the TB view lots at the top of the landfill will be close to $2M premium. Ravello view lot premiums at OH were around $2M.Imagine someone paying a $1M+ premium for a view of the landfill in OH4, that would be crazy but I guess the demand will be there!
This house backs against the trail. Landscape wasnt even done nor occupied by original owner.$3M+ homes being sold in Eastwood now!:
like buying CMGI or Rambus at $500 in 99This house backs against the trail. Landscape wasnt even done nor occupied by original owner.
Eastwood SFH is creeping toward $3 mil now. Here is another one that was sold $160k over LP. Buyers are getting FOMO.
Eastwood for 3M...I like EW, but no.This house backs against the trail. Landscape wasnt even done nor occupied by original owner.
Eastwood SFH is creeping toward $3 mil now. Here is another one that was sold $160k over LP. Buyers are getting FOMO.
I agree, $3M+ homes in "Easthood" is way too much!Eastwood for 3M...I like EW, but no.
i never thought I would see CMGI ever posted again. everyone and their mom was hot over that one.like buying CMGI or Rambus at $500 in 99
Eastwood for $3m?
If I think that's crazy... LiarLoan must be having an aneurism.
According to his monkey line graphs, Eastwood residents are losing money, not making money. Those residents could have bought Nvida stock instead of buying an Eastwood home and 10x’d so they are losing money.Eastwood for $3m?
If I think that's crazy... LiarLoan must be having an aneurism.
Easthood is the hood of the east I could have never imagined $3M+ homes being sold there. The Irvine market has changed so much since the pandemic!According to his monkey line graphs, Eastwood residents are losing money, not making money. Those residents could have bought Nvida stock instead of buying an Eastwood home and 10x’d so they are losing money.
/S