New Mortgage Guidelines set by the Fed?

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program

rickhunter_IHB

New member
This was from the WSJ...what does it mean to future mortgages???



Highlights of Final Rule Amending Home Mortgage Provisions of Regulation Z (Truth in Lending)



The rule establishes a new category of "higher-priced mortgages" that includes virtually all closed-end subprime loans secured by a consumer's principal dwelling. Which loans qualify as "higher-priced" will be determined by a new index that will be published by the Federal Reserve Board.1



The rule, for these higher-priced loans:



* Prohibits a lender from making a loan without regard to borrowers' ability to repay the loan from income and assets other than the home's value. A lender complies, in part, by assessing repayment ability based on the highest scheduled payment in the first seven years of the loan. To show that a lender violated this prohibition, a borrower does not need to demonstrate that it is part of a "pattern or practice."



* Prohibits a lender from relying on income or assets that it does not verify to determine repayment ability.



* Bans any prepayment penalty if the payment can change during the initial four years. For other higher-priced loans, a prepayment penalty period cannot last for more than two years.



* Requires that the lender establish an escrow account for the payment of property taxes and homeowners' insurance for first-lien loans. The lender may offer the borrower the opportunity to cancel the escrow account after one year.



The rule, for all closed-end mortgages secured by a consumer's principal dwelling:



* Prohibits certain servicing practices: failing to credit a payment to a consumer?s account as of the date the payment is received, failing to provide a payoff statement within a reasonable period of time, and "pyramiding" late fees.



* Prohibits a creditor or broker from coercing or encouraging an appraiser to misrepresent the value of a home.



* Creditors must provide a good faith estimate of the loan costs, including a schedule of payments, within three days after a consumer applies for any mortgage loan secured by a consumer's principal dwelling, such as a home improvement loan or a loan to refinance an existing loan.



The rule, for all mortgages:



* Requires advertising to contain additional information about rates, monthly payments, and other loan features. The rule also bans seven deceptive or misleading advertising practices, including representing that a rate or payment is "fixed" when it can change.



Based on compelling evidence from consumer testing, the Board is withdrawing the proposed rule regarding yield-spread premiums. The Board, however, intends to analyze alternative approaches to this issue as part of its ongoing review of the rules for closed-end loan rules under Regulation Z.



Compliance with the new rules, other than the escrow requirement, is mandatory for all applications received on or after October 1, 2009. The escrow requirement has an effective date of April 1, 2010 for site-built homes, and October 1, 2010 for manufactured homes.



Footnotes



1. The rule's definition of "higher-priced mortgage loans" will capture virtually all loans in the subprime market, but generally exclude loans in the prime market. To provide an index, the Federal Reserve Board will publish the "average prime offer rate," based on a survey currently published by Freddie Mac. A loan is higher-priced if it is a first-lien mortgage and has an annual percentage rate that is 1.5 percentage points or more above this index, or 3.5 percentage points if it is a subordinate-lien mortgage. This definition overcomes certain technical problems with the original proposal, but the expected market coverage is similar.
 
Well, if you're self employed, you're screwed.



And if they are verifying income, what's 35% of 88K (or whatever you think the median income of Irvine is) qualify you for? There is the new collar for housing prices, up and down.
 
I was just about to start a thread on this same topic. The day the FED officially killed the housing market.



This is such a stereotypical knee-jerk reaction, and it will spiral us into oblivion. You can make the argument that loans should always have been originated full-doc, and I won't disagree with you; however, we've effectively given the middle finger to anyone who needs to refinance. This is bad folks, really, really, bad. Please don't underestimate dire implications of this new regulation. Fannie and Freddie have already removed stated income, but almost all portfolio banks still offer it.



What pisses me off is how incompetent this FED has shown itself to be. They have said many times that one of their top priorities is stabilizing the housing market. Well dipshits you just did the exact opposite! This should show you how out of touch they are with the market. Personally, anything that helps bring prices down I welcome with open arms.



Expect super slow home sales to come.
 
<blockquote></blockquote>A loan is higher-priced if it is a first-lien mortgage and has an annual percentage rate that is 1.5 percentage points or more above this index, or 3.5 percentage points "



Are stated income loans always greater than 1.5% more than the index?
 
[quote author="lendingmaestro" date=1216080928] The day the FED officially killed the housing market..</blockquote>


is it the FED or all these banks who gave out loans they should have never given out... 100% finance on no-doc loan... mmmhhh
 
Tax returns will suffice for the self employed. I am sure most of the self employed will no longer be making a million dollars a year if they have to report that as income. What gets tricky is do you claim all the income so you can afford a bigger house or buy a smaller house so you can continue to hide the income?



Who will get hosed in this may be up and comers, like doctors, lawyers or someone that has an upside.



As far as killing the housing market should we refinance people that don't qualify for normal lending standards?
 
[quote author="lendingmaestro" date=1216080928]I was just about to start a thread on this same topic. The day the FED officially killed the housing market.



Expect super slow home sales to come.</blockquote>




Did they kill the market, or just kill any sales that should have been killed for the past ten years anyway?
 
Finally... the barn door is shut. Too bad all the escaped animals have all died from lack of food/loans. Perfect timing, this will definitely help the mortgage market and the economy.
 
I'm surprised the market isn't down more. Looks like cash is king again.



Now, where to stash the cash since the only safe place seems to be my mattress with me sitting on top with Bix's tommy gun.
 
Why would this hurt the dollar?



Banks are forced to do strict underwriting and this changes exchance rates vs other currencies in what way?



Explain please.
 
I think I have posted in the wrong thread. My post was directed more towards the Fed bailout plans for Fannie and Freddie. With the recent failure of Indymac and the probable failure of Wamu and probable failures of Downey and Wachovia. The fed will not let these banks fail, so they will print their way out of this mess.
 
Back
Top