usctrojancpa
Well-known member
OCtoSV said:Why? Land value, especially now with the ability to subdivide into up to 4 units which even Irvine won't be able to stop. Condos have ZERO land value - a sucker's game unless you acquire it as a cash flow positive rental from day 1. It's all about land in a prime location. My buddy back east and I talked about this when he was weighing Princeton SFR and the commute into NYC vs Bronxville condo (upscale NYC suburb) and a much shorter commute - land ownership mattered to him as well. Maybe Gen Z/Millennials value bright and shiny vs fundamental value.
CalBruin - I live down in the depths of Almaden in a older pad. I would never live up on Comms Hill just to get a newer pad as that area is kind of sketchy compared to Almaden with Leland HS, which is where Asians that can't afford Saratoga or Cupertino move to.
Irvine is filled with both attached and detached condos which sell like hotcakes so the market has spoken. The very last homes built in Portola Springs and Orchard Hills will be primo SFR locations and will cost a pretty penny.