MalibuRenter's summer in Dallas

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
[quote author="MalibuRenter" date=1244103073]I'm not sure what will happen to the quality of life over the next 2-5 years in CA. The drop in revenues will last for years. There are a number of expenditures in the State budget which are exceptionally difficult to cut. I think the furloughs will get longer, and the State will cut way back on money going to local entities.</blockquote>


As a start, if the state and Fed would stop financing illegals (health, welfare, SS benies, etc), we might, just might, be able to dig ourselves out. It would help, but clearly there's significantly more that needs to be done.
 
[quote author="Adam Ginsberg" date=1244252051][quote author="MalibuRenter" date=1244103073]I'm not sure what will happen to the quality of life over the next 2-5 years in CA. The drop in revenues will last for years. There are a number of expenditures in the State budget which are exceptionally difficult to cut. I think the furloughs will get longer, and the State will cut way back on money going to local entities.</blockquote>


As a start, if the state and Fed would stop financing illegals (health, welfare, SS benies, etc), we might, just might, be able to dig ourselves out. It would help, but clearly there's significantly more that needs to be done.</blockquote>


One of the problems is, if a million people (legal or illegal) left the state, real estate problems would get worse. There would be an even bigger vacancy rate.
 
I have been surprised at how many of the same retail places are in both LA and Dallas. They are even arranged the same way inside. That can be creepy sometimes, like a spatial form of deja vu.



Of the places that I have gone to frequently in LA, these are the same in Dallas:

Lowes, Home Depot, Bank of America, Chase, Bed Bath Beyond, Sears, Target, Anthropologie, CVS, Apple Store, Fry's and Best Buy.



Somewhat different:

Many of the Albertson's on Dallas don't sell wine, beer, or other alcohol.



Not in Dallas:

In N Out, Carl's Jr, Trader Joe's, Disneyland.



Not in Los Angeles:

Central Markethttp://www.centralmarket.com/

Twisted Root Burger

Whataburger (and LA is probably better off without it)

BassPro, politically incorrect for Los Angeles, but a very interesting place, http://www.basspro.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CFPageC?storeId=10151&catalogId=10001&langId;=-1&appID=94&storeID=18 . The one in Dallas is so big it has it's own freeway exit.
 
[quote author="MalibuRenter" date=1244364222]

BassPro, politically incorrect for Los Angeles, but a very interesting place, http://www.basspro.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CFPageC?storeId=10151&catalogId=10001&langId;=-1&appID=94&storeID=18 . The one in Dallas is so big it has it's own freeway exit.</blockquote>


We have a Bass Pro at Victoria Gardens shopping center.
 
[quote author="SoCal78" date=1244381877][quote author="MalibuRenter" date=1244364222]

BassPro, politically incorrect for Los Angeles, but a very interesting place, http://www.basspro.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CFPageC?storeId=10151&catalogId=10001&langId;=-1&appID=94&storeID=18 . The one in Dallas is so big it has it's own freeway exit.</blockquote>


We have a Bass Pro at Victoria Gardens shopping center.</blockquote>


Rancho Cucamonga is in Riverside County. There are a number of things related to hunting which are easier to do or find in Riverside than Los Angeles.
 
[quote author="MalibuRenter" date=1244364222]Somewhat different:

Many of the Albertson's on Dallas don't sell wine, beer, or other alcohol.</blockquote>


Don't forget - you're in the "Bible Belt". It's only recently (within the past ~5 or so years) that several cities are no longer dry, and have done away with the whole ridiculous "membership" thing.



I don't think you'll ever find a grocery store that sells hard liquor (whisky, vodka, etc) in Dallas. Our local Kroger sold beer and wine, but nothing more powerful. You have to go to a liquor store.



<blockquote>Not in Dallas:

In N Out, Carl's Jr, Trader Joe's, Disneyland. </blockquote>


Oddly enough, you'll find Carl's Jr in some outer lying areas, but not in the large metropolitan cities. And certainly not in the numbers like CA.



Trader Joe's was something we sorely missed while living in TX. Although they don't carry everything for our needs, we love shopping there.



<blockquote>Not in Los Angeles:

Central Markethttp://www.centralmarket.com/

Twisted Root Burger

Whataburger (and LA is probably better off without it)

BassPro, politically incorrect for Los Angeles, but a very interesting place, http://www.basspro.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CFPageC?storeId=10151&catalogId=10001&langId;=-1&appID=94&storeID=18 . The one in Dallas is so big it has it's own freeway exit.</blockquote>


Whataburger is a TX classic. Great place to grab a damn fine burger after a late night out. ;)



The BassPro shop you linked is very close to our former home. We used to go there for bow equipment for our youngest - the place is huge. Try the steakhouse on site - Big Buck Brewery & Steakhouse.



When we first moved to TX, we noticed allot of similarities between Dallas and LA, and it surprised us.
 
There are extensive rumors that Trader Joe's is coming, especially starting in Ft Worth and then Dallas.



Yes, a few Carl's outside of the City. Dallas is covered with Sonic locations. Seem to be more of them and Subway than McDonald's.



There was a really interesting case of In N Out having a Texas stalker/impersonator. It's the first corporate case of this kind I can remember. We're not talking counterfeit DVDs. http://www.bizjournals.com/dallas/stories/2002/03/25/story6.html



" Hooked on the tasty burgers, James Van Blaricum said he just wanted to own a piece of the In-N-Out Burgers fast-food chain, highly popular on the West Coast.



But documents filed in ensuing court cases in California and Texas allege the Dallas investor's passion for burgers strayed into espionage and theft after the family owned chain in Irvine, Calif., rejected his offer to invest in or open a franchise.



In a lawsuit filed in Dallas County District Court Jan. 22, In-N-Out says Van Blaricum set in motion an "elaborate industrial espionage scheme." In an earlier federal suit in California, a former company executive of Van Blaricum's enterprise said the investor used an array of high-tech tools to "replicate In-N-Out in virtually every respect."



Van Blaricum could not be reached for comment. Attorneys on both sides have declined to discuss the cases.



Van Blaricum had high aspirations, looking to open 1,000 fast-food burger joints in 10 years and take his company public in half that time, said Jason Newling, Van Blaricum's former vice president of operations, in federal court filings Oct. 10. Those dreams crumbled, according to the records, when Newling blew the whistle in the summer of 2001.



At the time the California suit was filed in October, court records show, Van Blaricum's Dallas-based upstart restaurant known as Lightning Burgers had opened its first location at Six Flags Mall in Arlington and had land leases for five more Texas locations.



Van Blaricum and a group of his former employees admitted, among other things, to stealing trade secrets, uniforms, training materials and financial reports from In-N-Out, according to court documents filed by In-N-Out.



Parties to the California suit agreed to a settlement in November that requires Van Blaricum and his associated companies to pay $250,000 to In-N-Out. His seven former employees agreed to pay $250 each.



The settlement also called for Lightning Burgers to cease operations and barred all defendants from working for any burger business associated with Lightning Burgers.



In January, In-N-Out filed a Texas suit against Six Flags Mall L.P., owner of the Arlington mall, for allowing the business to continue. In-N-Out obtained a temporary restraining order preventing the use of the name Lightning Burgers anywhere in the mall.



The business there that now officially operates without a name is known among employees as "the burger place." At one point, the restaurant had an overhead menu advertising such items as the "Thunder Burger" and "Lightning Fries."



Mall spokesman Tom Morris said the mall terminated Van Blaricum's lease and has reached a confidential settlement with In-N-Out. The mall is now the owner of the burger business, Morris said.



"Six Flags Mall is more or less on the side of In-N-Out, and Six Flags believes In-N-Out is on the side of Six Flags," Morris said. He added the unnamed restaurant "is in the process of being sold to a national chain."



Newling said in the court papers he raised concerns about "blatantly copying In-N-Out" when Van Blaricum first approached him in the fall of 1999. Newling, who worked for Van Blaricum between August 1999 and June 2001, said he and Van Blaricum were associates in previous business ventures.



Newling said he later decided "what we were doing was wrong, and I decided I could no longer be involved in this theft of In-N-Out's confidential and proprietary information."



Newling also said Van Blaricum was "obsessed with copying In-N-Out down to the last detail."



To copy the burger's famous taste, Newling said he placed samples of In-N-Out's meat, cheese, buns and spread in "kyro-vac" containers that lowered the temperature and sucked out the air. The food samples were then sent to testing facilities for analysis.



"We found vendors who were willing to provide us with meat, cheese, buns and spread to replicate the samples," Newling said.



While working at an In-N-Out Burger store in Nevada, Newling said in court documents he would sneak inside between 2 and 4 a.m. to record the dimensions of the store. Using a digital camera, Newling shot "hundreds" of photographs of the store's equipment and e-mailed them to Van Blaricum in Dallas, according to court documents."
 
<blockquote> The BassPro shop you linked is very close to our former home. We used to go there for bow equipment for our youngest - the place is huge. Try the steakhouse on site - Big Buck Brewery & Steakhouse.



When we first moved to TX, we noticed allot of similarities between Dallas and LA, and it surprised us.</blockquote>


Somewhere between the kayak test pool and the fishing equipment, I missed the steakhouse. Since it was a hot day and no one was in the kayak pool, they let our Lab in for a swim.
 
Last night, and continuing through this morning, we are getting lots of thunder, lightning, and heavy rains. I remember storms like this from when I lived in KY and Chicago. Fun to watch from the safety of your house. Not so much fun if you are on a flight.



Sometimes winter storms in LA are this bad or worse. However, there is a big difference. In LA, it is usually cold rain. The most severe storms often leave snow at low altitudes.



In Dallas, it's often 70 degrees while it's raining. The rain itself is often swimming pool temperature.



Another big difference is people's response to this kind of storm. In Los Angeles, the local news treats heavy rains like a 6.5 earthquake. They go looking for landslides and stupid people trying to surf the LA river. When traffic lights go out, people don't handle it well.



Here, even where six lane roads intersect six lane roads, drivers cross one set at a time (e.g., 3 cars Midway northbound, then 3 cars Royal eastbound, etc.). It feels much safer in the rain in Dallas.



One other difference is not the fault of drivers in So Cal. Because there are extended periods without rain, the first storm will bring lots of oil on the roads to the surface. That makes the first few minutes of rain especially dangerous.
 
A lot of people I work with cite the ease of traveling anywhere from DFW as a major advantage of being here. I'm interested in what the people from IHB think. Here are my opinions and observations on DFW vs LAX.



I'm a frequent business traveler, and my wife flies some too. I have picked up and dropped of people at both airports, taken shuttles/cabs, and I have driven myself.



DFW has very slightly more air traffic than LAX. Just a few more passengers so far in 2009. Thus, it probably comes as a surprise to people from California that DFW is considerably easier to get in and out of, and to park at.



Part of this is due to DFW being huge, over 18,000 acres. LAX is 3500 acres. It also has to do with how DFW is laid out, and where it is located. Major freeways surround DFW (121, 114, 635, 161, 183, 360) <img src="http://www.texasfreeway.com/Dallas/new_freeway/161/images/161_dfw_map.gif" alt="" />. LAX is accessed primarily from the 405 or 110 freeways, or urban streets.



Because LAX has terminals and access laid out in a large U, regardless of what terminal you are going to, you will encounter either people dropping off or picking up passengers for every terminal. <img src="http://www.airport-la.com/img/terminal_map.gif" alt="" />



For arrivals, LAX has two sets of curbs. One is for hotel and parking shuttles. The other is for individuals. At DFW, there is only one curb at each terminal, and thus there are not nearly as many vehicles trying to cross lanes. The need to get across at least two lanes to pick up and drop off is one of the prime reasons LAX is annoying.



I didn't realize one of the other reasons that LAX had such difficult traffic was pretty much unnecessary. At LAX, police and security are persistently making people move their cars. You can't sit at a curb and wait for someone. Even if you are there a couple of minutes, they will force you to move.



At DFW, you pull up to the curb and wait if you would like. There is security, but they don't make you move a car if it's occupied. The pick up and drop off areas for each terminal are accessed separately. Thus, people going to Terminal C don't get in your way if you are going to Terminal D. DFW has also been laid out with vastly fewer lights and stop signs than LAX.



DFW has toll booths. If picking someone up, or dropping them off you will typically pay $2. If you stay longer, you pay more. I think this is to discourage people from getting there very early and driving in circles. At LAX, there are no tolls.



I am unsure of the reason, but I see far fewer parking and hotel shuttles at DFW.



At LAX walking from parking or the curb into the terminal is usually temperate, though sometimes windy or rainy. At DFW, you will more often get hot weather or a downpour.



LAX security lines are fairly short weekdays after 10 am. However, if you are taking a flight from LAX that leaves around 8 am, you might be standing in a security line for well over an hour. I have consistently gotten the feeling that people in Terminals 1, 5, and 6 are just making things up on a day to day basis about how to get people into and through the security lines.



Inside, the food is of similar quality and quantity. Ranging from candy bars at the stores to Starbucks, to full bars and restaurants.



My favorite airline, Southwest, flies from LAX but not DFW. DFW also doesn't have JetBlue or Virgin, making that a major drawback. For anyone here who hasn't yet flown Virgin, try it. The Boston to LAX flight I took was awesome. Virgin has their own checkpoints at many airports, and the waits are very short.



I will have to pay closer attention next time at DFW, but I know LAX has lots of irrelevant announcements. If someone is already past security, they don't need to know that the white zone is for loading and unloading only. If they are catching a flight having left an unattended car at the curb, it's already towed. I don't really need to be reminded every 5 minutes to keep my baggage in close visual contact.



For anyone who likes choosing your own seat on a plane once you can see who you would be sitting next to, or believing we should live in a classless society, the preponderance of American flights out of DFW might annoy you. You will get to sit through boarding announcements starting with first class, and then Executive Platinum, regular Platinum, Gold, and Elite. Some of us like to just get on the plane.



When in LA, I like to fly from Burbank, and from Dallas, Love Field. More on those airports later.
 
[quote author="MalibuRenter" date=1244926624]A lot of people I work with cite the ease of traveling anywhere from DFW as a major advantage of being here. I'm interested in what the people from IHB think. Here are my opinions and observations on DFW vs LAX.

When in LA, I like to fly from Burbank, and from Dallas, Love Field. More on those airports later.</blockquote>


I believe DFW 's major advantage is like CA's weather. has nothing to do the airport itself, instead its pure location factor - middle of country, max three hours to west coast and max three hours to east coast. since AA has its hub there, you can get to many places via direct flight. And you can always make a day trip if it is necessary.



In terms of DFW, for the people who lives in the DFW area, it has easy access. But if you live in Plano, or Frisco, it is no more convenient than me living in Irvine and going to DFW. Not sure if you have noticed, if you take AA, and leave from gate C, you might come back at Gate D, or Gate E. So deciding where to park your car becomes a problem unless you take a car services to the airport. I don't like the parking at LAX, so I use one-person shuttle services or car services to LAX. Frankly, I think SNA is extremley convenient for most of us living in OC. Once a while, we drive to LAX, which is not a big deal. The flight from ca to the east coast is just way too long, espeically if you sit in coach.



If you don't live in Dallas, connecting in DFW is also no more convenient than any other major hubs, like Chicago, Denver, or Houston. 1/2 time when I connect at DFW via AA, I have to hike to another terminal, which is a pain.



You probably haven't experienced: DFW has very long and often delays in summer and winter due to storms, which rarely happens in LAX ( often in SFO, due to fog).



Bottom line: DFW is centrally located that make it a very business friendly location.



On a different subject: I think AA is among the worst airlines in the US, while continental is the best. I travelled to the east coast last week on coach, and came back on first class. Both services were so much better, and friendlier than my recent experiences on AA, and United. Not sure if any of you noticed, AA's planes are just look and feel dirtier.
 
[quote author="irvine123" date=1244930441][quote author="MalibuRenter" date=1244926624]A lot of people I work with cite the ease of traveling anywhere from DFW as a major advantage of being here. I'm interested in what the people from IHB think. Here are my opinions and observations on DFW vs LAX.

When in LA, I like to fly from Burbank, and from Dallas, Love Field. More on those airports later.</blockquote>


I believe DFW 's major advantage is like CA's weather. has nothing to do the airport itself, instead its pure location factor - middle of country, max three hours to west coast and max three hours to east coast. since AA has its hub there, you can get to many places via direct flight. And you can always make a day trip if it is necessary.



In terms of DFW, for the people who lives in the DFW area, it has easy access. But if you live in Plano, or Frisco, it is no more convenient than me living in Irvine and going to DFW. Not sure if you have noticed, if you take AA, and leave from gate C, you might come back at Gate D, or Gate E. So deciding where to park your car becomes a problem unless you take a car services to the airport. I don't like the parking at LAX, so I use one-person shuttle services or car services to LAX. Frankly, I think SNA is extremley convenient for most of us living in OC. Once a while, we drive to LAX, which is not a big deal. The flight from ca to the east coast is just way too long, espeically if you sit in coach.



If you don't live in Dallas, connecting in DFW is also no more convenient than any other major hubs, like Chicago, Denver, or Houston. 1/2 time when I connect at DFW via AA, I have to hike to another terminal, which is a pain.



You probably haven't experienced: DFW has very long and often delays in summer and winter due to storms, which rarely happens in LAX ( often in SFO, due to fog).



Bottom line: DFW is centrally located that make it a very business friendly location.



On a different subject: I think AA is among the worst airlines in the US, while continental is the best. I travelled to the east coast last week on coach, and came back on first class. Both services were so much better, and friendlier than my recent experiences on AA, and United. Not sure if any of you noticed, AA's planes are just look and feel dirtier.</blockquote>


American is not my favorite airline. They are only half a notch above United in my book. If the only flight which fits my schedule is United, I consider coming in much earlier on another airline or moving the meeting. I have been stranded or missed meetings when flying United far more often than any other airline, despite doing my best not to fly with them.



I've had to switch terminals at DFW for connections and getting to my car. The train isn't bad.
 
For the past 10+ years, I've traveled for business, obviously doing so primarily from DFW, now LAX/BUR. Probably 90%+ is with AA. Everyone has their reasons, but I prefer AA - they've always treated me well. Being a Gold club member certainly helps.



If you are in the NW Dallas area, DFW is a breeze. Closer to downtown Dallas? Use DAL. Without a doubt, it's the most convenient and easy airport to get in and out of. Peak travel times @ DFW are the ~8am flights. If you take the early, early am flights (6am), you won't hit hardly any lines at all. Like most airports, Monday's are the worst. And, as noted, if you fly AA, you'll likely leave from one terminal, and arrive back at another, so parking can be a PITA. However, parking right at the terminal is only $16 per day, as compared to $30 per day @ LAX.



Frankly, I was spoiled flying in/out of DFW - depending on the day/time, I could typically leave my home ~90min before my flight, and have plenty of time to drive to the airport, park, check in, drop my bags, and make it through security with time to spare. Plus, 3-3.5 hours to either coast, mostly via a single hop. Now, it's 2+ hours of drive time, 30min to park and take a shuttle, and another 1.5 hours to get checked in/bags dropped and through security. And, more times than not, I have to make 2 hops.



If you decide to put down roots in Dallas, and still continue traveling for business, consider moving closer to the airport. Lot's of very good neighborhoods, and still an easy commute to your office.
 
[quote author="Adam Ginsberg" date=1245075342]For the past 10+ years, I've traveled for business, obviously doing so primarily from DFW, now LAX/BUR. Probably 90%+ is with AA. Everyone has their reasons, but I prefer AA - they've always treated me well. Being a Gold club member certainly helps.



If you are in the NW Dallas area, DFW is a breeze. Closer to downtown Dallas? Use DAL. Without a doubt, it's the most convenient and easy airport to get in and out of. Peak travel times @ DFW are the ~8am flights. If you take the early, early am flights (6am), you won't hit hardly any lines at all. Like most airports, Monday's are the worst. And, as noted, if you fly AA, you'll likely leave from one terminal, and arrive back at another, so parking can be a PITA. However, parking right at the terminal is only $16 per day, as compared to $30 per day @ LAX.



Frankly, I was spoiled flying in/out of DFW - depending on the day/time, I could typically leave my home ~90min before my flight, and have plenty of time to drive to the airport, park, check in, drop my bags, and make it through security with time to spare. Plus, 3-3.5 hours to either coast, mostly via a single hop. Now, it's 2+ hours of drive time, 30min to park and take a shuttle, and another 1.5 hours to get checked in/bags dropped and through security. And, more times than not, I have to make 2 hops.



If you decide to put down roots in Dallas, and still continue traveling for business, consider moving closer to the airport. Lot's of very good neighborhoods, and still an easy commute to your office.</blockquote>


I flew to Houston the other day from Love Field. From my house to the security checkpoint was under 15 minutes. I was at the gate in 28 minutes. More on that in my next post.
 
Another observation on real estate here. In CA the white wood sign posts are ubiquitous. There is a place next to the Metrorail tracks where they are made and stored. When I last took the train past it in late 2008, there were thousands of them.



As I drove around rural areas of Malibu and Calabasas, there were also hundreds of them realtors had never picked up. "Once for sale" litter. Usually the sign had blown off in the wind. Frequently the post had fallen too. I went to several raw land properties with 3 or more sign posts one the ground.



In Dallas, all-metal rectangular signs are more common. They don't fall apart in the wind.
 
There are many big differences between CA and TX. One which is currently very significant is the State budget. TX has balanced its budget, reduced the size of the budget, made its rainy day fund larger, and used a minimum of budget tricks. Oh, and Texas HAS a budget already. CA is typically much later in getting a budget.



Balancing the TX budget was made easier by not having a state income tax. And of course, it was also made easier by not having a housing bubble that provided more consumer cash than the state's largest employer, and a subsequent crash.



For my work, I have taken close looks at the financial situations of both state governments. CA is in a much tougher position. In my opinion, CA will have much worse problems not only in this recession, but probably at least through 2012.



p://governor.state.tx.us/news/press-release/12644/

"AUSTIN ? Gov. Rick Perry today signed Senate Bill 1 into law, providing a balanced budget that spends $1.6 billion less in general revenue than the previous biennium. The budget funds key priorities from higher education and job creation to border security. The governor also used his line-item veto power to reduce the two-year budget by $97.2 million in general revenue and $288.9 million from all funding sources.



?The Legislature has done a commendable job in reducing the general revenue appropriation to live within the Comptroller?s revenue estimate issued in January, cutting general revenue spending by $1.6 billion,? Gov. Perry said. ?It is particularly noteworthy lawmakers balanced the budget without using the state?s Rainy Day Fund and provided a tax cut to 40,000 small businesses.?



The budget signed by Gov. Perry decreases general revenue spending by $1.6 billion, or 1.9 percent, compared to the current biennium, while still maintaining funding for key areas such as economic development, education and public safety. This decrease in spending has only occurred once since World War II.



This 2010-11 budget continues several key investments, including water infrastructure and border security, which are essential to the growth and security of the state; and funding for the Texas Enterprise Fund and the Emerging Technology Fund, which allow the state to maintain a competitive business climate, invest in new technologies and attract world class researchers to the state?s institutions of higher education. The budget also makes a significant increase in funding for financial aid for higher education as well as the Skills Development Fund, which are critical to helping more Texans realize the dream of a college education, and ensuring the state has an educated and trained workforce to compete in the global marketplace.



A+dditionally, the Legislature left the state?s Rainy Day Fund untouched; the fund is projected to grow to $9 billion by the end of the 2010-11 biennium. Lawmakers also took steps to reduce diversions from the State Highway Fund, providing an additional $378 million for road construction and maintenance, and expanded highway and debt service payment line items in the Texas Department of Transportation budget for greater transparency. "
 
[quote author="reason" date=1245931446]How's the weather over there? Is it bearable?</blockquote>


It has been hot for about a week, with highs in the high 90s. At night, about 75.



I was raised in the South and it's not that bad. There is especially a lot of morning cloudiness. This isn't like being in Palm Springs in summer when it is starkly bright a few minutes after sunrise.



People jog and play soccer or basketball in this weather, mostly in the evenings around 7 or 8 pm. Our dog has slowly adapted and can go running with us at night.



We recently replaced an original equipment air conditioner which was decades old. The new one is better and more efficient. The house has both a window unit in the master, and central air. It's nice not to have to cool the entire house when you are only in one room for 8 hours.



I've noticed how different our two cars are in really hot weather. If parked outside while shopping, the Mercedes starts out cooler, and cools down much faster than the 1993 Honda.
 
[quote author="MalibuRenter" date=1246045491][quote author="reason" date=1245931446]How's the weather over there? Is it bearable?</blockquote>


It has been hot for about a week, with highs in the high 90s. At night, about 75.



I was raised in the South and it's not that bad. There is especially a lot of morning cloudiness. This isn't like being in Palm Springs in summer when it is starkly bright a few minutes after sunrise.



People jog and play soccer or basketball in this weather, mostly in the evenings around 7 or 8 pm. Our dog has slowly adapted and can go running with us at night.



We recently replaced an original equipment air conditioner which was decades old. The new one is better and more efficient. The house has both a window unit in the master, and central air. It's nice not to have to cool the entire house when you are only in one room for 8 hours.



I've noticed how different our two cars are in really hot weather. If parked outside while shopping, the Mercedes starts out cooler, and cools down much faster than the 1993 Honda.</blockquote>


Yeah, it's beginning to get hot here too in Orange Co.
 
Back
Top