lower price home + higher (hoa+mello) vs lower (hoa + mello) + higher price home

assuming two similar houses with monthly cash outlays ~$3000... would you rather have...

  • 560k house price +110 hoa +300 mello + 495 prop tax

    Votes: 22 78.6%
  • 530k house price +260 hoa +300 mello + 470 prop tax

    Votes: 6 21.4%

  • Total voters
    28
NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
villagepeople said:
IndieDev said:
Buying a TIC stucco box in this economic weather is the equivalent of buying a $52,000 2011 Honda Civic when the parking lot is full of 2010 models that have yet to be sold.

as i've mentioned before and usc-cpa has confirmed that there aren't a whole lot of newer detached condos or sfr <600k

That's because people are trying to sell their 2003 Civics for $49,000. Still the same problem, no one wants to buy a Civic at that price.
 
Can anyone explain why Portola Springs has much higher HOA comparing with WB, QH or SG?  PS looks dead because of HIGH HOAs....
 
I would think it has to do with home density and elevated grounds maintenance?

I think QH also has higher HOAs... and Laguna Altura is going to be $295 a month.
 
QH has lower density and better elevations than PS.  Will PS will the Poor's QH in the next 5-10 years?  if the HOAs stay same,  I think it will be next Ladera Ranch
 
PS would be better compared as the poor Orchard Hills... or poor Lambert Ranch.

Laguna Altura is the poor Quail Hill... even though LA will be higher priced and have a gate.
 
Back
Top