entrypoint_IHB
New member
<p>Bubblegum- Plans 3 and 4 probably have the lowest sqf cost (low $300). But we actually like Plan 2 the best because of the center courtyard and the master bedroom being on the first floor. </p>
<p>IR- I meant to say that over the lifetime of a mortgage (15-30 years), a 10-20% value decline will most likely be negligible in my opinion. I agree with most of your assessments regarding the local RE market. Hence, it is the opportunity cost of having to tie most of our saving to a house is one of my main concerns. Of course unless the market takes another surprise turn, again! </p>
<p>However, part of me still thinks that the Irvine RE market is in a better position (highly in demand for the reason BK stated, high percentage of renters who want to own, a relatively young and diverse demographic and market economy, etc.) compares to the sorrounding cities, therefore it will sustain better in a RE downturn. Case in point, my wife and I are currently living in Costa Mesa. Now that we have a kid, our highest priority is to move to a more family friedly eighborhoob and good school district. For many families like ours, Irvine is the most practical choice. </p>
<p>Awgee- No one can predict the exact percentage of the anticipated RE correction. In my opinion, a 10-20% value decline for new and in highly demand communities is a reasonable number. I might be way off, but it is within the range of acceptable risk of owning a home in my situation. History does not always repeat itself. In the end, we all need to make choices and take risks based on our financial knowledge and gut feeling whether it is in buying a home or anything in life. Only will time will tell!</p>
<p>Again thanks to IR and everyone at IHB for all the invaluable information! </p>
<p>IR- I meant to say that over the lifetime of a mortgage (15-30 years), a 10-20% value decline will most likely be negligible in my opinion. I agree with most of your assessments regarding the local RE market. Hence, it is the opportunity cost of having to tie most of our saving to a house is one of my main concerns. Of course unless the market takes another surprise turn, again! </p>
<p>However, part of me still thinks that the Irvine RE market is in a better position (highly in demand for the reason BK stated, high percentage of renters who want to own, a relatively young and diverse demographic and market economy, etc.) compares to the sorrounding cities, therefore it will sustain better in a RE downturn. Case in point, my wife and I are currently living in Costa Mesa. Now that we have a kid, our highest priority is to move to a more family friedly eighborhoob and good school district. For many families like ours, Irvine is the most practical choice. </p>
<p>Awgee- No one can predict the exact percentage of the anticipated RE correction. In my opinion, a 10-20% value decline for new and in highly demand communities is a reasonable number. I might be way off, but it is within the range of acceptable risk of owning a home in my situation. History does not always repeat itself. In the end, we all need to make choices and take risks based on our financial knowledge and gut feeling whether it is in buying a home or anything in life. Only will time will tell!</p>
<p>Again thanks to IR and everyone at IHB for all the invaluable information! </p>