I've always been a supporter if PS. I lived in Woodbury for a year and change in 2007/2008 and it felt crowded then. Ps is less dense which is nice. If I was buying new in irvine, north of the 5, non grove OH, I would go PP first and PS second. Although being a valuhntr I would put stan pacs greenwood at Tustin legacyirvinehomeowner said:And Columbus Square? Who are you... test??qwerty said:PS is better than stonegate, cypress village and woodbury.
qwerty said:I've always been a supporter if PS. I lived in Woodbury for a year and change in 2007/2008 and it felt crowded then. Ps is less dense which is nice. If I was buying new in irvine, north of the 5, non grove OH, I would go PP first and PS second. Although being a valuhntr I would put stan pacs greenwood at Tustin legacyirvinehomeowner said:And Columbus Square? Who are you... test??qwerty said:PS is better than stonegate, cypress village and woodbury.
O Hills said:qwerty said:I've always been a supporter if PS. I lived in Woodbury for a year and change in 2007/2008 and it felt crowded then. Ps is less dense which is nice. If I was buying new in irvine, north of the 5, non grove OH, I would go PP first and PS second. Although being a valuhntr I would put stan pacs greenwood at Tustin legacyirvinehomeowner said:And Columbus Square? Who are you... test??qwerty said:PS is better than stonegate, cypress village and woodbury.
Is there a good public source of info on stutus of Tustin Legacy project?
Curious abt the homes that they'll sell and when.
qwerty said:O Hills said:qwerty said:I've always been a supporter if PS. I lived in Woodbury for a year and change in 2007/2008 and it felt crowded then. Ps is less dense which is nice. If I was buying new in irvine, north of the 5, non grove OH, I would go PP first and PS second. Although being a valuhntr I would put stan pacs greenwood at Tustin legacyirvinehomeowner said:And Columbus Square? Who are you... test??qwerty said:PS is better than stonegate, cypress village and woodbury.
Is there a good public source of info on stutus of Tustin Legacy project?
Curious abt the homes that they'll sell and when.
this is the main site, but kind of outdated, helpful though with regard to getting info on the pollution that existed at the base
http://tustinlegacy.com/
test is probably the best source of info. he also started this thread but no floor plans or anything
http://www.talkirvine.com/index.php/topic,11840.msg233407.html#msg233407
Irvinecommuter said:I think all villages have pros/cons. I never begrudge anyone for buying at one village over another. My concerns for PS are as followed:
1) No retail space nearby
2) The surrounding area feels "isolated". That is somewhat alleviated by Pavilion Park but it's still has an "undeveloped" feel to it. Bordering the 261 and 133 does not help.
3) Fire danger
4) Basically two access points: Arrowhead and Ridge Valley. Thus, you drive past where PS starts to get into the community. Woodbury and SG both have multiple exit points leading out to Jeffrey/Portola Blvd/Irvine/Sand Canyon.
5) Confusing streets. It's not as bad as Woodbury but it's still somewhat confusing.
6) Lack of close school...the opening of PS Elementary will help a lot but back when PS was opening, the lack of a neighborhood school was not good.
I think a lot of the issues with PS resulted from the downturn in the market and economy. TIC basically stopped developing between 2007 and 2009 and PS got the bad end of that. A lot of it can be address with the development of the Great Park but it may not help if GP is going to have a lot more residential areas that are "closer" to the freeway. For example, I would probably buy PP over PS had those been the choices.
paperboyNC said:Irvinecommuter said:I think all villages have pros/cons. I never begrudge anyone for buying at one village over another. My concerns for PS are as followed:
1) No retail space nearby
2) The surrounding area feels "isolated". That is somewhat alleviated by Pavilion Park but it's still has an "undeveloped" feel to it. Bordering the 261 and 133 does not help.
3) Fire danger
4) Basically two access points: Arrowhead and Ridge Valley. Thus, you drive past where PS starts to get into the community. Woodbury and SG both have multiple exit points leading out to Jeffrey/Portola Blvd/Irvine/Sand Canyon.
5) Confusing streets. It's not as bad as Woodbury but it's still somewhat confusing.
6) Lack of close school...the opening of PS Elementary will help a lot but back when PS was opening, the lack of a neighborhood school was not good.
I think a lot of the issues with PS resulted from the downturn in the market and economy. TIC basically stopped developing between 2007 and 2009 and PS got the bad end of that. A lot of it can be address with the development of the Great Park but it may not help if GP is going to have a lot more residential areas that are "closer" to the freeway. For example, I would probably buy PP over PS had those been the choices.
I think you are talking only about Enclave 1. Here's a master plan for PS:http://www.talkirvine.com/index.php?topic=396.0
Enclave 6 is not on the plan but is between Pavilion Park and the 133. They have been grading the land southeast of Pavilion Park. It will be away from the toll roads, fire danger, etc.
Part of the appeal of Portola Springs is that each Enclave is unique and a buyer can choose the Enclave that fits their needs.
Irvinecommuter said:I think all villages have pros/cons. I never begrudge anyone for buying at one village over another. My concerns for PS are as followed:
1) No retail space nearby (agree nothing walking distance, but not a big deal for me since WB Town Center is so near and on the way home from work)
2) The surrounding area feels "isolated". That is somewhat alleviated by Pavilion Park but it's still has an "undeveloped" feel to it. Bordering the 261 and 133 does not help. (This depends on which enclave you live in. I agree that the ones past Lambert Ranch area are a bit like a dead end.)
3) Fire danger (Also depends which enclave you live in. Unless your house is right up against the mountain, the chance that a fire would burn down your house is close to nothing.)
4) Basically two access points: Arrowhead and Ridge Valley. Thus, you drive past where PS starts to get into the community. Woodbury and SG both have multiple exit points leading out to Jeffrey/Portola Blvd/Irvine/Sand Canyon.
5) Confusing streets. It's not as bad as Woodbury but it's still somewhat confusing. (This wouldn't be an issue if you lived here. The streets are very easy to learn, much easier than WB.)
6) Lack of close school...the opening of PS Elementary will help a lot but back when PS was opening, the lack of a neighborhood school was not good.
I think a lot of the issues with PS resulted from the downturn in the market and economy. TIC basically stopped developing between 2007 and 2009 and PS got the bad end of that. A lot of it can be address with the development of the Great Park but it may not help if GP is going to have a lot more residential areas that are "closer" to the freeway. For example, I would probably buy PP over PS had those been the choices.
dealcatcher said:My comments in parenthesis below.
Irvinecommuter said:I think all villages have pros/cons. I never begrudge anyone for buying at one village over another. My concerns for PS are as followed:
1) No retail space nearby (agree nothing walking distance, but not a big deal for me since WB Town Center is so near and on the way home from work)
2) The surrounding area feels "isolated". That is somewhat alleviated by Pavilion Park but it's still has an "undeveloped" feel to it. Bordering the 261 and 133 does not help. (This depends on which enclave you live in. I agree that the ones past Lambert Ranch area are a bit like a dead end.)
3) Fire danger (Also depends which enclave you live in. Unless your house is right up against the mountain, the chance that a fire would burn down your house is close to nothing.)
4) Basically two access points: Arrowhead and Ridge Valley. Thus, you drive past where PS starts to get into the community. Woodbury and SG both have multiple exit points leading out to Jeffrey/Portola Blvd/Irvine/Sand Canyon.
5) Confusing streets. It's not as bad as Woodbury but it's still somewhat confusing. (This wouldn't be an issue if you lived here. The streets are very easy to learn, much easier than WB.)
6) Lack of close school...the opening of PS Elementary will help a lot but back when PS was opening, the lack of a neighborhood school was not good.
I think a lot of the issues with PS resulted from the downturn in the market and economy. TIC basically stopped developing between 2007 and 2009 and PS got the bad end of that. A lot of it can be address with the development of the Great Park but it may not help if GP is going to have a lot more residential areas that are "closer" to the freeway. For example, I would probably buy PP over PS had those been the choices.
eclipxe said:Someone say Baker Ranch? 8)
Irvinecommuter said:I'll pull it out the quotes to make it easy to read:
1) It's not really the from work to home trip but the "ooh, I need X to make something" or "hey it's Sunday Night and let's go somewhere close to eat/shop." The two access point thing doesn't help because if you have to find your way out of the PS even before you make the trip toward Woodbury SC. Not to mention trying to get to CV Shopping Center, Orangetree Shopping Center, or the Korean Market. With SG (for example), I would generally cut through the community to go out to Jeffrey or Irvine Blvd. If I want to go to Woodbury Shopping Center, I'll just go out on Sand Canyon.
thatOSguy said:paperboyNC said:I've never driven this little in my life as I have living in Portola Springs.
Fair point. Once you're getting in your car and driving, adding 1-3 minutes to the process is de minimis. It's a distinction without much of a difference, right? 'smuch as bones gives me shit for it, I do jump on a bike and load up the panniers now and again at NP or OH shopping centers, and that's a bit more of a chore from "WAY OUT THERE" (hands gesticulating wildly) in Portola Springs.