Lakers News

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
eyephone said:
AW said:
AW said:
Insane numbers indeed.
#Wageinequality.

I'm waiting to hear any contract deal for Anthony Bennett aka #number1bustofalltime.

NBA just went down a notch for me...

http://nypost.com/2016/07/14/nets-add-savvy-veteran-and-all-time-draft-disaster/

can't wait for football to start

Is Tom Brady going to take the case to the Supreme Court? If so, do you think the Supreme Court will take the case?

Would think the supreme Court has better things to rule on.
 
Nance Jr went down hard with possible broken hand on dunk attempt over Cavs d-leaguer Liggins flop (look at the replay). Pissed, totally avoidable play if the defensive player didn't flop and make Nance lose balance, and really dangerous as well.  Arghhhhh
 
jmoney74 said:
eyephone said:
AW said:
AW said:
Insane numbers indeed.
#Wageinequality.

I'm waiting to hear any contract deal for Anthony Bennett aka #number1bustofalltime.

NBA just went down a notch for me...

http://nypost.com/2016/07/14/nets-add-savvy-veteran-and-all-time-draft-disaster/

can't wait for football to start

Is Tom Brady going to take the case to the Supreme Court? If so, do you think the Supreme Court will take the case?

Would think the supreme Court has better things to rule on.

I guess Tom Brady will serve the four game suspension.
#deflategateover
 
ps9 said:
Nance Jr went down hard with possible broken hand on dunk attempt over Cavs d-leaguer Liggins flop (look at the replay). Pissed, totally avoidable play if the defensive player didn't flop and make Nance lose balance, and really dangerous as well.  Arghhhhh

He should be ready by the regular season...so it's probably not as bad as it sounds. 

Is it true that the Lakers can still retain their 2017 first round pick if it's in the top 3?  I really want them to stop tanking now that Kobe is gone.
 
The California Court Company said:
if lakers 2017 pick is in top 3, they will keep 2017 and 2019 and lose 2018. Otherwise they will lose 2017 and 2019 and keep 2018.

remind me again....this is all for the Bynum/Dwight trade?  man...talking about mortgaging your future.  That trade was a bonafide flop.
 
paydawg said:
The California Court Company said:
if lakers 2017 pick is in top 3, they will keep 2017 and 2019 and lose 2018. Otherwise they will lose 2017 and 2019 and keep 2018.

remind me again....this is all for the Bynum/Dwight trade?  man...talking about mortgaging your future.  That trade was a bonafide flop.

Nope. The 2017 pick is due to that brilliant trade for a 40 year old point guard who was nonathletic at 20 years old and never played D in his career, Nash. BRILLIANT!

The latter is due to the Dwight trade. They keep bouncing around because they're protected, and the NBA doesn't allow you to trade successive years' picks. They want to protect you from yourself, so that you can't trade the next three years' picks for Westbrook, as an example.
 
ps9 said:
Nance Jr went down hard with possible broken hand on dunk attempt over Cavs d-leaguer Liggins flop (look at the replay). Pissed, totally avoidable play if the defensive player didn't flop and make Nance lose balance, and really dangerous as well.  Arghhhhh

Larry Nace diagnosed with a sprained wrist.
 
eyephone said:
ps9 said:
Nance Jr went down hard with possible broken hand on dunk attempt over Cavs d-leaguer Liggins flop (look at the replay). Pissed, totally avoidable play if the defensive player didn't flop and make Nance lose balance, and really dangerous as well.  Arghhhhh

Larry Nace diagnosed with a sprained wrist.

Early luck. He's been the Lakers best all-around player in Summer League.
 
eyephone said:
Lakers Fans: the Westbrook window has passed. Close to a 3yr/85 ext with OKC

I think he wants revenge against KD... if you play fantasy bball, draft Westbrook, his stats are going to be bonkers this season.
 
He seems a little more old school.  Definitely wants to make his mark with the team he started withth.
 
eyephone said:
Lakers Fans: the Westbrook window has passed. Close to a 3yr/85 ext with OKC

This is a good thing. Removes hope and speculation, but more importantly, we don't want nor need Westbrook. The Lakers aren't competing for a championship within the next two years. They don't need a top~5 player. He'd only take the ball out of the young guns' hands stunting their development. Advanced metrics also suggest Westbrook is a highly inefficient player. He just does so much so well, that he overcomes his inefficient play (poor shot selection multiplied by poor jump shooting).
 
Perspective said:
eyephone said:
Lakers Fans: the Westbrook window has passed. Close to a 3yr/85 ext with OKC

This is a good thing. Removes hope and speculation, but more importantly, we don't want nor need Westbrook. The Lakers aren't competing for a championship within the next two years. They don't need a top~5 player. He'd only take the ball out of the young guns' hands stunting their development. Advanced metrics also suggest Westbrook is a highly inefficient player. He just does so much so well, that he overcomes his inefficient play (poor shot selection multiplied by poor jump shooting).

I would take Westbrook over any player on the current Lakers roster. (assuming no injuries)
 
I'm with Perspective... don't want Westbrook on the Lakers... he's like Kobe 2.0.

Not worried about DRuss, I just hope Ingram bulks up... I think he's skinnier than when KD was a rook.
 
irvinehomeowner said:
I'm with Perspective... don't want Westbrook on the Lakers... he's like Kobe 2.0.

Not worried about DRuss, I just hope Ingram bulks up... I think he's skinnier than when KD was a rook.

I want to win, I'm sick of tanking. (Your a clip fan)
 
eyephone said:
Perspective said:
eyephone said:
Lakers Fans: the Westbrook window has passed. Close to a 3yr/85 ext with OKC

This is a good thing. Removes hope and speculation, but more importantly, we don't want nor need Westbrook. The Lakers aren't competing for a championship within the next two years. They don't need a top~5 player. He'd only take the ball out of the young guns' hands stunting their development. Advanced metrics also suggest Westbrook is a highly inefficient player. He just does so much so well, that he overcomes his inefficient play (poor shot selection multiplied by poor jump shooting).

I would take Westbrook over any player on the current Lakers roster. (assuming no injuries)

I agree. My end goal though, is to have a ton of talent developing and really competing in 2-3 years, not a eighth seed first round, maybe second round, playoff appearance for the next three years.
 
eyephone said:
irvinehomeowner said:
I'm with Perspective... don't want Westbrook on the Lakers... he's like Kobe 2.0.

Not worried about DRuss, I just hope Ingram bulks up... I think he's skinnier than when KD was a rook.

I want to win, I'm sick of tanking. (Your a clip fan)
One Westbrook won't make the Lakers win.

They couldn't do it with just one Kobe the last few seasons.

OKC couldn't win and with Westbrook and KD (although they should have) so how can Westbrook do any better with the Lakers?
 
Very true. 
He won't be in a super team like the Warriors or the Knicks (per D Rose), hahaha

His contract makes more sense than mozgov, still not over it...
 
Back
Top