eyephone said:Mety said:Goriot said:Mety said:lovingit said:I would have to agree with you on this. But for some reason, La Vita sells faster. Maybe it?s Shadys $800/month HOA that turns the buyers to OHs $300/month Hoa? Haha
aquabliss said:$3.8M for La Vita? I?ll take this any day of the week. Privacy and serenity is 10x more than La Vita.https://www.redfin.com/CA/Irvine/20-Praire-Grass-92603/home/5899769
What do you guys think would a better/faster resale between La Vita and Shady Canyon?
Based on Buyer Agent Listings, I think both of the Buyers that paid $3.7mm and $3.8mm for these two Plan 4s are Koreans. Seems like they are taking over OH these days. They prefer homes that are relatively new, close proximity to School, Zion market and variety of Korean/Asian restaurants which OH offers. Shady is far away from these offerings, older, and less desirable floor plans for the similar price range. Buyers that want bigger lot and more privacy will buy SC. Thus, it's all buyer preference.
I agree. While SC homes might offer more privacy and bigger lots, it's not always about those factors you buy the home for. I personally much prefer newer homes' floor plans. The plazas nearby would be a big plus also. For the buyers with that big home budget, they probably got some Jr. or High School kids which OH offers schools inside their hood. But location-wise, I would much prefer SC for my personal living while I think OH homes are better investments.
?Are better investments?, BUT you don?t believe in ROI.
There is nothing wrong with ROI just like there is nothing wrong money itself. In fact, using God given money wisely is something I would encourage people to do so.
Love of money is the problem. Love of ROI is the problem.
The focus here wasn't really about ROI though. I also said I prefer SC which I think is less attractive for ROI purposes.