blackacre-seeker_IHB
New member
Schools in my opinion are just there so the parents can put their kids there for the day and go to work. None of the parents I know are satisfied with the quality of education their kid is receiving, including at the most prestigious of the schools like St. Margaret. I have no plans to rely on the school to teach my kid anything. After all, kindergarten curriculum is just laughable, they teach what most kids know by 3 years of age if their parents are doing their job.
However, by sending him to a good school in Irvine, he gets to learn how to deal with different people, how to compete with kids who are smart and motivated in a relatively safe environment. If I send him to school in Santa Ana, what is he going to learn? How to speak Spanish? How to deal dope? If he goes to any less performing school, he would be deprived of an opportunity what real competition is like at grad schools and high-profile jobs. Yes, I learned from reading the forums that top 10% for any high school gets to go to the UCLA or the like. What happens to the other 90%, who do they become?
However, by sending him to a good school in Irvine, he gets to learn how to deal with different people, how to compete with kids who are smart and motivated in a relatively safe environment. If I send him to school in Santa Ana, what is he going to learn? How to speak Spanish? How to deal dope? If he goes to any less performing school, he would be deprived of an opportunity what real competition is like at grad schools and high-profile jobs. Yes, I learned from reading the forums that top 10% for any high school gets to go to the UCLA or the like. What happens to the other 90%, who do they become?