nosuchreality said:
Kenkoko said:
If you are pro capitalism, can you really blame Fox / MSNBC for figuring out the secret to profitability?
It's a business. They generate more profit by providing contents that catering to a smaller but more devout audience.
News were different 30 years ago not because human nature was different back then.
We just didn't have the tools we have today. Like big data feeding AI driven prediction models etc
Even with the rapid growth of alternative media, this trend is not reversing.
People in general don't care about caveats and nuances.
Haven't we all accepted (maybe unwilling) that proper policy discussion can be had over Twitter post Trump ?
I'm pro-capitalism. Being pro-capitalism doesn't mean you support doing everything to earn a buck. It is
not capitalism when a corporation is doing the equivalent of knowingly dumping mass quantities of proven carcinogenic toxins in the water supply.
I can excuse some of the behaviors of corporations in the gilded age, they literally did not know the damage their pollution was causing, these corporation do know and actively trying to suppress the information they do know about the harm they are causing.
I agree with your stance personally, but you're making a moral argument. It's easy when it's black and white.
When it's a business decision, moral arguments often don't win out. Businesses will weigh the cost of fines & blowbacks vs. the profits of damping mass toxins.
It's a systemic problem of capitalism.
Is that evil? maybe but it's also reality.
I'm saying it'd be more productive if people channel their outrage into changing the system instead of being outraged at CEOs who have every incentive to buck against their moral value.