irvinehomeowner said:
Hey... if you dish it out... you should be able to take it too.
You throw out your high-end home ownership as proof to how well you know the valuation of places like QH and TRidge... yet you look down on people who want to own in Irvine. Then you like to throw jabs about where people live, where they are buying and how much they want to buy but you can't take a little needling about your own details... glass house/stone casting lesson somewhere in there.
You know, when people discuss business, a lot of what people say is emotional and psychological. Insecurity is hard to hide. I've seen it in my own career dealing with contacts and suppliers from West Africa to China. Usually when people are caught off guard because of their own lack of knowledge, they become defensive. I can sense it very easily. Either a person's body language will become more enclosed (crossing arms for example), or they will speak defensively, personal attacks occasionally. It's not about "taking it", for me, it's about understanding why, and it's because of this I've been able to be successful even through a translator.
Whether Indie bought in a bubble (he didn't), Indie HELOC'd his house (he didn't), Indie is going to buy a home close to the ocean (he is), is irrelevant, the market is the market, and my own personal purchasing behavior is too small to determine anything. So let us take a 10,000 foot view.
When it comes down to it since the beginning of 2011, I've been saying the same thing, on the same platform, based on the same verifiable market facts. Whether people take it personally because they've bought an overpriced albatross in a market that is correcting is not really my concern. You may call it "jabbing", I call it fundamentals, and I haven't been wrong.
They are a cold thing when you are on the wrong side of them, trust me, I've lost money once before making hasty decisions not based on fundamental market factors but emotional/psychological factors. The best thing you can do is to learn from it so it doesn't happen again. That being said, some people learn better than others.
It's all psychology. For instance,
Starlight East bought a stucco box in Woodbury East. Good for him, but he seems defensive to the fact that Woodbury has very low potential for any actual appreciation in the next few years. Is that my fault or his? If he enjoys the home, he shouldn't worry about my personal opinion on Irvine housing unless... he thinks what I'm saying is actually true. He knows he'll take a bath to the tune of tens of thousands of dollars in the next few years, and I'm a constant reminder of that. So he tries his best to paint me as someone who is not knowledgeable, or doesn't know the market. It's all psychology, then after a while, it can become pure fantasy.
The worst thing you can do is invent a fantasy when it comes to your own financial decisions.
lcms2002 actually thinks the following:
- Home ownership is special, you have better memories.
- Owning for 20 years, it actually gets better.
Or
edhne:
- Backing to Culver (a 6 lane road in many places) isn't that bad a thing if you live in Turtle Ridge. It's special.
- A 40 year old home selling at $839,000 will be able to rent at parity or above.
That's incredible. It displays a type of psychological conditioning that has been cultured over years and years of pro ownership myths. It's almost sad, but mostly incredible that anyone could believe such a thing. Psychology.
But if it helps my fans to invent stories about my life, then so be it, but as I mentioned before, it simply exposes the psychology behind the people who are doing it. While I deal with facts, much easier to work with IMHO, you get to deal with making up fantasy. I guess it has to be a specialty of someone who owns in Irvine, especially the last few years.