Irvine for Responsible Growth
- Thread starter saveirvine
- Start date
NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
My comment has nothing to do with trust. Simply a matter of $$$ being spent. Based on all the junk mail I?m receiving, the YES on B PACs are outspending the NO side by a wide margin.
As for which way I vote, it simply comes down to the issues. I throw all the fliers into the trash. A Yes vote on B is a reasonable compromise that lets all parties win.
Agreed
What's the issue with D? That's the one that Irvine PD wants right?
I read Prop D to ban future Prop Bs.
Oh...okay. Then I would be against prop D if I am for prop B. Fun.
I think that if Prop D passes, in the future the city council would be able to do the landswap without needing voter approval.
I don't want that either.
Burn That Belly
New member
x
Burn That Belly
New member
x
iacrenter
Well-known member
eyephone said:
My comment has nothing to do with trust. Simply a matter of $$$ being spent. Based on all the junk mail I?m receiving, the YES on B PACs are outspending the NO side by a wide margin.
As for which way I vote, it simply comes down to the issues. I throw all the fliers into the trash. A Yes vote on B is a reasonable compromise that lets all parties win.
The one thing that sickens me is how they are using veterans as a pawn (both sides).
Saying shit like "Real veterans say No on B" or "Real veterans say Yes on B". F that. Veterans should be happy no matter which location it ends up on. They appreciate that they are being appreciated. What they might not appreciate, though, is being used as pawns in a political game. It's disgusting. It's even more disgusting seeing the signs when driving around on Memorial Day or seeing the ads on Facebook.
Yes, there might be a real veteran who lives in Irvine who has a biased opinion on the matter, but that guy's opinion is based on the other political issues. The real issues are:
-More possible traffic.
-Five Points getting free money.
-People buying homes there being afraid to live next to it.
-People hoping their real estate values shoot up
Saying shit like "Real veterans say No on B" or "Real veterans say Yes on B". F that. Veterans should be happy no matter which location it ends up on. They appreciate that they are being appreciated. What they might not appreciate, though, is being used as pawns in a political game. It's disgusting. It's even more disgusting seeing the signs when driving around on Memorial Day or seeing the ads on Facebook.
Yes, there might be a real veteran who lives in Irvine who has a biased opinion on the matter, but that guy's opinion is based on the other political issues. The real issues are:
-More possible traffic.
-Five Points getting free money.
-People buying homes there being afraid to live next to it.
-People hoping their real estate values shoot up
paperboyNC
New member
iacrenter said:
Agreed
Irvinecommuter
New member
paperboyNC said:
What's the issue with D? That's the one that Irvine PD wants right?
paperboyNC
New member
Irvinecommuter said:
I read Prop D to ban future Prop Bs.
Irvinecommuter
New member
paperboyNC said:
Oh...okay. Then I would be against prop D if I am for prop B. Fun.
paperboyNC
New member
Irvinecommuter said:
I think that if Prop D passes, in the future the city council would be able to do the landswap without needing voter approval.
Irvinecommuter
New member
paperboyNC said:
I don't want that either.
