[quote author="no_vaseline" date=1219895277]Here is the total chart:
1 Pleasanton, Calif. $113,345 $8,196 $131,048 $10,415
2 Newton, Mass. $110,885 $10,361 $139,404 $16,481
3 Newport Beach, Calif. $110,511 $5,967 $162,976 $28,370
4 Yorba Linda, Calif. $109,681 $7,142 $122,373 $8,686
5 Flower Mound, Texas $105,812 $6,366 $112,555 $7,838
6 Highlands Ranch, Colo. $99,066 $5,052 $103,516 $7,265
7 Irvine, Calif. $98,923 $4,821 $111,455 $5,487
8 West Bloomfield Township, Mich. $98,832 $8,442 $113,191 $9,882
9 Chino Hills, Calif. $96,733 $8,745 $102,745 $5,497
Here is the Irvine sales data (July):
Irvine 92602 $650,000 -9.7% 24 9.1%
Irvine 92603 $726,000 -15.1% 39 -2.5%
Irvine 92604 $567,500 -11.0% 21 0.0%
Irvine 92606 $721,000 -0.6% 13 -38.1%
Irvine 92612 $475,000 -37.1% 31 -29.5%
Irvine 92614 $561,000 11.5% 12 20.0%
Irvine 92618 $460,000 -22.0% 20 -9.1%
Irvine 92620 $634,000 -14.7% 44 -17.0%
Here is Ladera Ranch sales data (July)
Ladera Ranch 92694 $570,000 -28.7% 52 -3.7%
Here is the Yorba Linda sales data (July):
Yorba Linda 92886 $566,000 -34.4% 54 22.7%
Yorba Linda 92887 $775,000 -3.1% 26 8.3%
Here is Chino Hills sales data (July)
Chino Hills 91709 58 $499 -16.5% 6 $308 -23.0% $241
So, it appears that Irvineistas are paying about 6:1 (price:income), Ladarians are paying about 5.7:1 (I'm assuming Ladera and Irvine have the same median income), Yorba Lindaindans are paying about 6.5:1, and Chino Hills Holla Ballas are paying about 5:1.
Whats the difference between Chino Hills and YL and Ladera and Irvine? IMO, where they fall on the backside of the road to Bustoville, as they revert to whatever Case Schiller multiple they should be at. And not just my opinion:
<blockquote>"People are saying the reason prices are falling are because of all of the foreclosures, but the foreclosures are happening because the prices are falling," Thornberg said. "They've got it backwards. The prices are falling because they're too freakin' high."</blockquote>
<a href="http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/articles/2008/08/27/housing/869dataparty082708.txt">http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/articles/2008/08/27/housing/869dataparty082708.txt</a>
I would like to see the whole data set of the census, not just the median. If somebody has it, please post it or a link or something along those lines. It will give us an absolute cap on what you can finance using "conventional" products, which will accurately nail what you can ultimately spend on a given stucco box.</blockquote>
Pleasanton is sort of like the OC of the Bay area in terms of it being newer, cookie cutter etc. No one I know would want to live there, and it is way down on the prestige scale in the Bay compared to Irvine's prestige scale in OC. Irvine's way nicer. Newton MA is a very nice suburb of Boston, and I'm surprised the median income is that low. Probably skewed due to the large number of longtime residents in that town.