I'm picky and stubborn and extremely patient. I know what I want and what price I'm willing to pay for it. I also don't want to live in a place that makes me unhappy every day. It's not worth the stress and daily cortisol injection. I'm also a hard-worker and a very diligent about saving. If my down payment goes up, and my salary goes up, and the price of the house stays the same, eventually the two shall meet. Realistically it's not that far away looking at current trends so I don't worry too much about it.
And they lived happily ever after.
[quote author="rickhunter" date=1228625867]So it's an affordability issue for you. Not that you cant "afford" it, but that you want it to be more affordable?
So would you say that if price for the home that you want do not go to the scale of earning/buying power you're at,
you will never buy? Or would you settle for your 2nd, 3rd choice that would make it more affordable?
[quote author="caycifish" date=1228624066]This thread is starting to turn into yet another one where folks put their stat of choice, whether it be national, California, Southern California, OC, or Irvine stats, all into a blender, and then you hit "Mix" without putting the top on, and then everyone goes running around the kitchen screaming while random stats come flying out and hit random people's shirts.
And I can assure you that there is very little to no demand for track houses in Anaheim. Irvine, sure.
Would I buy the house I want in Tustin today if I was assured it would stay the same price for 10 years? Nope. I'd wait until my earning/buying power had increased and inflation had eaten away at the price of the house such that the house became affordable.</blockquote></blockquote>