anteaterscientist_IHB
New member
<p>Crawl back to the IAC? I've been renting from the IAC for six years already. </p>
<p>Special treatment? I was suggesting at ways they can improve, should they believe in change, progress and improvement. Since they're a large corporation, they don't. I could have sounded condesending, but it was mostly sarcasm. Renter appreciation day was also to show your IAC pride and that you're a proud IAC renter, to bring the commnunity together. "Get back at the IAC" meant to take advantage of all those cookies and coffee they have in the leasing office. </p>
<p>I've always accepted the below par service from the IAC people esp b/c of lack of consistency demonstrated over the years, however commended them on their properties and ammenities. </p>
<p><em>What a thankless job that was...You have no idea what a leasing consultant goes through. </em>So I never like to play the Victim game.. but if it was a thankless job, shouldn't the employee management do something about it? Large corporation takes care of their people? Training, increase in pay? </p>
<p><em> The rules are in place for a reason. You think the communities are bad now, imagine if the rules lessened. </em>Didn't say anything about the rules.. </p>
<p><em>You might shrug off the insistence of the leasing agent to have all people present to sign the lease and not give out keys but it is a necessity for this reason, every single time I let someone slack on that I had an incomplete lease. After they were allowed to have keys and move in, forget it, I was never getting a signature on that lease. </em>I'd rather have IAC be strict beyond means with the policy, as opposed to inconsistent policies. Atleast I know what to expect. Various "move-in" times i was out of state, and things were OKAY. If I knew the rule was strictly you have to be there, I would be there. If the IAC people DECIDE to let things slide, they're also taking a risk.... If the rules were stricter, maybe it'll filter out those potential "bad tenants" </p>
<p>
self-entitled arrogance? (again sarcasm)
pretentious uci student?
rich dad poor dad investor?
santa monica?
four roommates?
MMPORG? </p>
<p>What do all those mean?
</p>
<p>Special treatment? I was suggesting at ways they can improve, should they believe in change, progress and improvement. Since they're a large corporation, they don't. I could have sounded condesending, but it was mostly sarcasm. Renter appreciation day was also to show your IAC pride and that you're a proud IAC renter, to bring the commnunity together. "Get back at the IAC" meant to take advantage of all those cookies and coffee they have in the leasing office. </p>
<p>I've always accepted the below par service from the IAC people esp b/c of lack of consistency demonstrated over the years, however commended them on their properties and ammenities. </p>
<p><em>What a thankless job that was...You have no idea what a leasing consultant goes through. </em>So I never like to play the Victim game.. but if it was a thankless job, shouldn't the employee management do something about it? Large corporation takes care of their people? Training, increase in pay? </p>
<p><em> The rules are in place for a reason. You think the communities are bad now, imagine if the rules lessened. </em>Didn't say anything about the rules.. </p>
<p><em>You might shrug off the insistence of the leasing agent to have all people present to sign the lease and not give out keys but it is a necessity for this reason, every single time I let someone slack on that I had an incomplete lease. After they were allowed to have keys and move in, forget it, I was never getting a signature on that lease. </em>I'd rather have IAC be strict beyond means with the policy, as opposed to inconsistent policies. Atleast I know what to expect. Various "move-in" times i was out of state, and things were OKAY. If I knew the rule was strictly you have to be there, I would be there. If the IAC people DECIDE to let things slide, they're also taking a risk.... If the rules were stricter, maybe it'll filter out those potential "bad tenants" </p>
<p>
self-entitled arrogance? (again sarcasm)
pretentious uci student?
rich dad poor dad investor?
santa monica?
four roommates?
MMPORG? </p>
<p>What do all those mean?
</p>