usctrojancpa
Well-known member
Cares said:USCTrojanCPA said:In general, if a 10-year ARM rate is lower by 3/8% or more than a 30-year fixed rate then the ARM loan should be seriously considered (1/2% or more lower for a 7-year ARM).
How can you generalize here when you don't know how interest rates will perform in 10 years? What if the interest rate is 10% when your ARM adjusts?
I'm not talking about where interest rates will be in 10 years, I'm talking about what kind of minimum rate discount a borrower should consider accepting to take on some interest rate risk by getting an ARM loan instead of a 30-year fixed loan. The majority of homes sell every 5-7 years plus it's safe to assume that within a 7-10 year period there will be economic heartburn which will cause interest rates to fall where the borrower can refi into a new ARM loan at a lower rate so why pay for a higher rate when you won't fully benefit from it.
Most borrowers don't get ARM loans because they don't understand how they work. Once I explain how an ARM loan works to my clients and provide a detailed calculation of both the monthly savings along with the lower loan balance at the end of the ARM period vs what it would be with a 30-year fixed loan many of them opt for a 7 or 10 year ARM loan instead of a 30-year fixed loan. One of my jobs is to provide my clients information and different options and giving them a clear explanation of the pros and cons of ARM loans. That being said, ARM loans are not for everyone.