USCTrojanCPA said:eyephone said:irvinehomeowner said:eyephone said:woodburyowner said:USCTrojanCPA said:Why not refi into or 7-year or 10-year ARM if it's in the 2%s instead when you plan on paying off your home in less than 15 years? The thought is that you can make your payment the same as a 15-year fixed payment so with a lower rate you will accelerate the payoff to less than 15 years and any interest rate risk would be minimized.
Right now, ARMs are only priced aggressively for loan sizes above the conforming limits and even better for jumbo loan sizes. Anything within the conventional limit will have an ARM rate almost the same as a 30 year fixed.
From a long term perspective. I would not get an arm.
But who stays long term?
Many of you said not to buy the last 2 years because people don?t usually stay in a home more than 5-10 years.
ARMs are so low now that if you are looking at a 15yr fixed or know you won?t stay longer than the ARM term you should consider it... but only if you can afford a fully indexed payment.
That is your opinion. But I do think of the rate is really super low. People would rather get a fixed than an arm.
Even if the seller won't keep the home for more than 7-10 years? This happens a lot of first purchases of attached and detached condos. Why pay the extra interest when you won't benefit from having a 30-year fixed loan?
Peace of mind. Someone people are busy with work, family, life. They don?t have time to hedge the rate. I say get a low rate and be done with it.