How low can we go? 30 yr fixed at 3.75% with no fees...

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
eyephone said:
Mety said:
Liar Loan said:
Mety said:
yes2 said:
I was able to lock at 3.75% for non owner occupied with 0.875 points, 30 yr fixed, 25% down

Is it illegal to get the loan as a primary resident home, which has the lower interest rates, then put it on a rental market? If it has a planned purpose like that, then it could be illegal I guess, but what if the buyer suddenly got relocated else where? Or what if the buyer doesn't like the home? etc.

You normally need to wait 12 months to rent it out.  If you applied for owner occupied knowing it would be used as a rental right away, that's an open-and-shut case of mortgage fraud.  Lot's of people do it, but I don't think it's wise, and obviously it's not ethical or legal.

I see. Didn't know people actually do it. I guess it's better to live a year at least then rent it out if you really want to stay clean. We're not currently into doing this kind of investment, but just wanted to see how others handle this in case of emergency like job relocation and stuff.

Please read my post regarding this topic. Trust me I?m. Super genius and I gave the ramifications if you fail to let the bank know that the property is not owner occupied.

I read your post and also gave Thanks in case you didn't see.  ;)
 
Mety said:
eyephone said:
Mety said:
Liar Loan said:
Mety said:
yes2 said:
I was able to lock at 3.75% for non owner occupied with 0.875 points, 30 yr fixed, 25% down

Is it illegal to get the loan as a primary resident home, which has the lower interest rates, then put it on a rental market? If it has a planned purpose like that, then it could be illegal I guess, but what if the buyer suddenly got relocated else where? Or what if the buyer doesn't like the home? etc.

You normally need to wait 12 months to rent it out.  If you applied for owner occupied knowing it would be used as a rental right away, that's an open-and-shut case of mortgage fraud.  Lot's of people do it, but I don't think it's wise, and obviously it's not ethical or legal.

I see. Didn't know people actually do it. I guess it's better to live a year at least then rent it out if you really want to stay clean. We're not currently into doing this kind of investment, but just wanted to see how others handle this in case of emergency like job relocation and stuff.

Please read my post regarding this topic. Trust me I?m. Super genius and I gave the ramifications if you fail to let the bank know that the property is not owner occupied.

I read your post and also gave Thanks in case you didn't see.  ;)

But you mentioned to live there a year then rent it out without changing the status of the loan. Fail
 
eyephone said:
Mety said:
eyephone said:
Mety said:
Liar Loan said:
Mety said:
yes2 said:
I was able to lock at 3.75% for non owner occupied with 0.875 points, 30 yr fixed, 25% down

Is it illegal to get the loan as a primary resident home, which has the lower interest rates, then put it on a rental market? If it has a planned purpose like that, then it could be illegal I guess, but what if the buyer suddenly got relocated else where? Or what if the buyer doesn't like the home? etc.

You normally need to wait 12 months to rent it out.  If you applied for owner occupied knowing it would be used as a rental right away, that's an open-and-shut case of mortgage fraud.  Lot's of people do it, but I don't think it's wise, and obviously it's not ethical or legal.

I see. Didn't know people actually do it. I guess it's better to live a year at least then rent it out if you really want to stay clean. We're not currently into doing this kind of investment, but just wanted to see how others handle this in case of emergency like job relocation and stuff.

Please read my post regarding this topic. Trust me I?m. Super genius and I gave the ramifications if you fail to let the bank know that the property is not owner occupied.

I read your post and also gave Thanks in case you didn't see.  ;)

But you mentioned to live there a year then rent it out without changing the status of the loan. Fail
Yeah, I failed. Now I'm gonna cry... :'(
 
So after a year, it?s totally fine to rent it out without letting the lender know? Then how did I fail, eyephone?

BTW, I?m not encouraging anyone to commit the mortgage defraud. I?m just asking what is illegal and what people actually do. LL has provided the clearest answer on that so far.
 
Mety said:
So after a year, it?s totally fine to rent it out without letting the lender know? Then how did I fail, eyephone?

BTW, I?m not encouraging anyone to commit the mortgage defraud. I?m just asking what is illegal and what people actually do. LL has provided the clearest answer on that so far.

A friend of mine has a rental for many years bought with owner occupied mortgage. He did not wait 12 months, rented it right away. Never notified lender and lender never bothered to check.

The key point to the legality of it is "intent" when you applied for the mortgage.

It's damn hard to prove intent.
 
Mety said:
So after a year, it?s totally fine to rent it out without letting the lender know? Then how did I fail, eyephone?

BTW, I?m not encouraging anyone to commit the mortgage defraud. I?m just asking what is illegal and what people actually do. LL has provided the clearest answer on that so far.

I?m starting a new thread because this doesn?t have to do with interest rate.
 
eyephone said:
Mety said:
So after a year, it?s totally fine to rent it out without letting the lender know? Then how did I fail, eyephone?

BTW, I?m not encouraging anyone to commit the mortgage defraud. I?m just asking what is illegal and what people actually do. LL has provided the clearest answer on that so far.

I?m starting a new thread because this doesn?t have to do with interest rate.

You can start a new thread about this or anything you see fit, but this discussion actually is all about interest rates. The reason people choose to do is because of the lower rates they get out of it. Some people do it intentionally and some people do it because they actually don?t know. Since we?re having historical lower rates, more people could be buying investment properties so this discussion can be helpful (or harmful) to know the legality of it.
 
Mety said:
eyephone said:
Mety said:
So after a year, it?s totally fine to rent it out without letting the lender know? Then how did I fail, eyephone?

BTW, I?m not encouraging anyone to commit the mortgage defraud. I?m just asking what is illegal and what people actually do. LL has provided the clearest answer on that so far.

I?m starting a new thread because this doesn?t have to do with interest rate.

You can start a new thread about this or anything you see fit, but this discussion actually is all about interest rates. The reason people choose to do is because of the lower rates they get out of it. Some people do it intentionally and some people do it because they actually don?t know. Since we?re having historical lower rates, more people could be buying investment properties so this discussion can be helpful (or harmful) to know the legality of it.

What you described is mortgage fraud also know as white collar crime.
 
eyephone said:
Mety said:
eyephone said:
Mety said:
So after a year, it?s totally fine to rent it out without letting the lender know? Then how did I fail, eyephone?

BTW, I?m not encouraging anyone to commit the mortgage defraud. I?m just asking what is illegal and what people actually do. LL has provided the clearest answer on that so far.

I?m starting a new thread because this doesn?t have to do with interest rate.

You can start a new thread about this or anything you see fit, but this discussion actually is all about interest rates. The reason people choose to do is because of the lower rates they get out of it. Some people do it intentionally and some people do it because they actually don?t know. Since we?re having historical lower rates, more people could be buying investment properties so this discussion can be helpful (or harmful) to know the legality of it.

What you described is mortgage fraud also know as white collar crime.

Yes, but after a year of the owner living, it is NOT illegal to rent out so not a crime anymore.
 
Mety said:
eyephone said:
Mety said:
eyephone said:
Mety said:
So after a year, it?s totally fine to rent it out without letting the lender know? Then how did I fail, eyephone?

BTW, I?m not encouraging anyone to commit the mortgage defraud. I?m just asking what is illegal and what people actually do. LL has provided the clearest answer on that so far.

I?m starting a new thread because this doesn?t have to do with interest rate.

You can start a new thread about this or anything you see fit, but this discussion actually is all about interest rates. The reason people choose to do is because of the lower rates they get out of it. Some people do it intentionally and some people do it because they actually don?t know. Since we?re having historical lower rates, more people could be buying investment properties so this discussion can be helpful (or harmful) to know the legality of it.

What you described is mortgage fraud also know as white collar crime.

Yes, but after a year of the owner living, it is NOT illegal to rent out so not a crime anymore.

Go to the other thread.
 
Kenkoko said:
Mety said:
So after a year, it?s totally fine to rent it out without letting the lender know? Then how did I fail, eyephone?

BTW, I?m not encouraging anyone to commit the mortgage defraud. I?m just asking what is illegal and what people actually do. LL has provided the clearest answer on that so far.

A friend of mine has a rental for many years bought with owner occupied mortgage. He did not wait 12 months, rented it right away. Never notified lender and lender never bothered to check.

The key point to the legality of it is "intent" when you applied for the mortgage.

It's damn hard to prove intent.

I agree, from a criminal standpoint intent is harder to prove, but from a lender-calling-the-note standpoint the occupancy status is all that matters.  If you are in violation of the occupancy requirement, you are in technical default and foreclosure proceedings can begin.  Some lenders/servicers make more of an effort to check occupancy than others. 

As you know, some lenders care very deeply about monitoring their risk, and others could care less.  Subprime lenders back in the day were content to look the other way, but a portfolio loan at a medium-sized bank might receive more scrutiny.

It's unlikely a criminal proceeding would occur unless there was a pattern of fraud.  One borrower with multiple owner-occupied mortgages taken in a short amount of time would indicate intent and be easier to prove.
 
Looks like 30 yr fixed rates are heading lower again...got a quote from cashcall for 3.375 fixed at 775$ (promo until tomorrow). Owning.com also advertising 3.375.
 
For jumbo conforming refi in my area ($720K loan) the best i've seen this week is 2.875% for 15 yr with a total cost of ~$4K, or 3.25% for 30 yr for ~$1K total cost.
 
It's possible to see 3.0% for some out of pocket costs. I have a customer being quoted - real or not - 3.125 Jumbo Conforming for about $4,000 in closing fees. As I tell everyone in the refinance game "phone quotes aren't worth the paper they are printed on" which this was in this case. Yes, the TI readership base does not want to pay closing fees, but if we don't see 3.125 for zero fees, perhaps it was worth it to pay the $4k.... one never knows. Remember each owner has their own specific needs and wants and paying closing costs can make sense in unique situations.

There is a cost of funds and a cost to produce / service loans. At some point in time we will see banks not breaching a specific rate threshold as investors don't want to push money into a financial resource that can't keep up with inflation. I believe we are getting close to that "red line" at present.

We shall see...!

My .02c
 
Seems like election years gets pretty low rates. Time to start looking.

I have friends and family in the mortgage business but I'm uncomfortable going to them for a refi.

I think I'm still irritated when one of my immature relatives was working in underwriting for a bank, saw my name and then told my other relatives how much we make.
 
Soylent Green Is People said:
It's possible to see 3.0% for some out of pocket costs. I have a customer being quoted - real or not - 3.125 Jumbo Conforming for about $4,000 in closing fees. As I tell everyone in the refinance game "phone quotes aren't worth the paper they are printed on" which this was in this case. Yes, the TI readership base does not want to pay closing fees, but if we don't see 3.125 for zero fees, perhaps it was worth it to pay the $4k.... one never knows. Remember each owner has their own specific needs and wants and paying closing costs can make sense in unique situations.

There is a cost of funds and a cost to produce / service loans. At some point in time we will see banks not breaching a specific rate threshold as investors don't want to push money into a financial resource that can't keep up with inflation. I believe we are getting close to that "red line" at present.

We shall see...!

My .02c

I don't think we'll breach a 3% 30-fixed rate at no points.
 
I agree that at some points, investors would have no interest in investments that yield little to none above long term inflations rates.

There will be a cost, or should be a cost for doing business.

No ones works for free.
 
Decided to refi with Cashcall for 3.25% APR for 30 yr fixed. Was able to get fee waived as I am repeat customer with them.  Filled out application just now.Based on past experience, their process has been very streamlined....Hope it will be the same this time around.
 
Back
Top