Headlines...

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
Second-best quote from Anonymous' article:


"...the Fed rate cuts, under normal circumstances, would free up money, but lenders are afraid of lending because they don't know how much risk of default they face, even at lower interest rates. <strong>It's a little like offering a lobster dinner to someone who is so constipated he can't take in another mouthful.</strong>"
 
<p>A quick summary by <strong>Suze Orman</strong> Money Matters</p>

<p>Some (Limited) Relief for the Mortgage-Stressed</p>

<p>http://finance.yahoo.com/expert/article/moneymatters/63481;_ylt=Ao1wRWsfhsEjFZ2n0hK4K2S7YWsA</p>
 
New Trend In Sacramento: 'Intentional Foreclosure'




<a href="http://cbs13.com/local/foreclosures.real.estate.2.638417.html?ref=patrick.net">cbs13.com - New Trend In Sacramento: 'Intentional Foreclosure'</a>
 
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/3xee66">US recession will dwarf dotcom crash</a>

By Edmund Conway, Economics Editor in Davos

<p>The recession facing the United States is of a scale that dwarfs the dotcom slump. </p>

<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/2ueycg"><strong>The latest news and analysis of the credit crisis</strong></a></p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2008/01/27/cnsoros127.xml">Stock market turmoil spells trouble ahead</a></strong></p>

<p><strong><a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/business/ambrosevanspritchard/december07/thefeddidnotpanic.htm">Ambrose Evans-Pritchard: Accusations the Fed panicked are rubbish</a></strong></p>

<p>The slowdown will cause a damaging regulation backlash as governments attempt to compensate for the financial pain facing families. Britain faces a similar plight, though it may avoid as deep a slowdown as the US.</p>

<p><strong><img width="200" height="300" border="0" alt="Ben Bernanke" src="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/graphics/2008/01/28/ben.jpg" /></strong></p>

<p>Fed chairman Ben Bernanke will face criticism whatever he decides on rates</p>

<p>The views of Stephen Roach, one of the world's leading economists, now heading the Asian wing of Morgan Stanley, would have seemed outrageous at last year's World Economic Forum. </p>

<p>It is a sign of the times that they are now close to the consensus. This year's event has been dominated by discussions of the stock market slump on both sides of the Atlantic, the Federal Reserve's emergency interest rate cut and the SocGen fraud disaster.</p>

<p>But underlying everything has been the silent truth that the US is facing a very possible recession, and is fast having to adapt to a far less enjoyable economic climate.</p>

<p class="story">"We have, as relatively sophisticated, well-developed economies, gotten hooked on credit as never before," said Roach, speaking about the UK and US. "If we had been running our economies the old-fashioned way, for example, where saving and consumption were funded by income, maybe we wouldn't be in this mess we are in now.</p>

<p>illusion predicated on levering our assets, and unfortunately we didn't fully understand the risks we were taking on. The US may be in recession right now. The UK is not?. The US has more vulnerablility to a post-bubble shake-out today than it did seven years ago, and [more] than in the UK."</p>

<p>The reason this crunch will be so much worse, he said, is that the chunk of the economy which is shuddering to a halt - homebuilding and housing dependent consumption - is six times bigger than the spending on IT, which triggered the last one.</p>

<p>"The magnitude dwarfs anything we saw seven years ago."</p>

<p>The endgame, he said, is an "average recession" meaning just over a year's worth of economic shrinking - three times the depth of the recession seven years ago.</p>

<p>While Roach's views are now close to those of the majority, they are not shared by everyone. Nigel Doughty, of Doughty Hanson, for instance, suspects many of the Davos crowd have become overly pessimistic this year.</p>

<p>"I think everyone is being too gloomy about 2008," he said. "This year could be a lot better than many expect for both the US and the UK. I suspect 2009 is the year to be more worried about."</p>

<p class="story">Much depends on the reaction of policymakers, who are already considering imposing new regulations on banks, whose use of sophisticated financial products contributed to the crisis.</p>

<p>Roach added: "There will be sand put in the gears of financial market innovation. Some of it will be justified but it will go too far. It's a significant risk."</p>

<p>US investment banks, meanwhile, are already having to turn to sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) from Asia and the Middle East to provide an unprecedented injection of funds to keep them afloat. Roach sees it as part of a wider question. "We are dealing with an incipient recession. Who's going to fund us? We don't have the wherewithal to fund it."</p>

<p>With SWFs in the spotlight, debate has raged this week over whether they ought to be more transparent, and to issue a voluntary code of conduct about their investment plans, but Roach said: "Why are we singling out sovereign wealth funds? Why shouldn't we ask the same of hedge funds, private equity or any other group of investors?</p>

<p>"Is it because these funds are coming from the Middle East, from China - areas that make us uncomfortable. Is this not thinly-veiled financial protectionism?"</p>

<p>Perhaps a silver lining - at least for the British Government - is these issues have distracted attention from Northern Rock, though Roach hasn't forgotten.</p>

<p>"I think it raised some unfortunate questions about the credibility of the Bank of England. Policymakers don't like to make mistakes - to go one way one day and change course the next. Mervyn King made a mistake. He will have to live with this."</p>
 
<p><em>"Firefighters arrived quickly to find a pair of adjacent 2 story residential dwellings <strong>under construction</strong> and fully involved with fire"</em> </p>

<p>Just sayin...looks fishy. Arson investigators on scene.</p>

<p><a href="http://lafd.blogspot.com/2008/01/homes-in-watts-succumb-to-early-morning.html">LAFD News & Information: Homes in Watts Succumb to Early Morning Blaze</a></p>
 
<p><a href="http://lansner.freedomblogging.com/2008/01/29/realtors-put-oc-home-prices-in-1st-fall-since-95/">http://lansner.freedomblogging.com/2008/01/29/realtors-put-oc-home-prices-in-1st-fall-since-95/</a></p>

<a title="Permanent Link: Realtors put O.C. home prices in 1st fall since ?95" rel="bookmark" href="http://lansner.freedomblogging.com/2008/01/29/realtors-put-oc-home-prices-in-1st-fall-since-95/">Realtors put O.C. home prices in 1st fall since ‘95</a>

<h4>January 29th, 2008 · <a href="http://lansner.freedomblogging.com/2008/01/29/realtors-put-oc-home-prices-in-1st-fall-since-95/#comments">5 Comments</a> · posted by Jeff Collins</h4>

<p>The California Association of Realtors reported today that the median Orange County house price for all of 2007 fell for the first time in 12 years. CAR reported that the median price of an existing single-family home was off 7.9% in December from December 2006, falling to $638,390. </p>
 
The volatility today was amazing to watch. When the announcement was given, the market shot up over 100 points in a few seconds. The late sell-off was pretty dramatic as well. I think we may be looking at our next leg down because it looks like sellers used the exuberance of buyers to dump some positions. If sellers have been waiting in the wings, they likely have more positions to close out.
 
Thank gawd, <a href="http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/01/farewell-to-ben.html">someone else feels the same as me about Ben Stein.</a>





<p><em>Its time to bid a not-so-fond <em>adieu</em> to the New York Times columns of <a href="http://www.benstein.com/bio.html">Ben Stein</a>. </em></p>

<em>No, he is not leaving the paper. Rather, we've reached the point where Stein's commentary has become detached from reality, so ridiculously fabricated, that it can no longer be read. Indeed, its become so absurd that not only have I decided to skip reading him, I am immediately making the public commitment to stop commenting on his Tom Foolery. </em>
 
<a href="http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/2008/01/s-financial-institution-losses-will.html" linkindex="458">S&P: Financial institution Losses "will reach more than $265 billion"</a>




Is it just me, or does that seem like a lot of money?
 
<p>Some happy news to start the day. </p>

<p><a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080131/economy.html">biz.yahoo.com/ap/080131/economy.html</a></p>

<p>"Consumers increased their spending at the weakest pace in six months while applications for unemployment benefits soared last week, two more signs the economy is weakening."</p>

<p>I guess the helicopter trick is not really working for Bernie. . . .</p>
 
LawyerLiz - Though I am bearish about the direction of the stock market in the intermediate term, what you saw yesterday was nothing but traders playing games to get money from other people. As I type this, the Dow is down 78.28 for the day at 12,364.55. I expect the close on Monday to be higher than it is right now.
 
<p><strong>New $20B subprime bailout on the table</strong></p>

<p>A proposal to bail out subprime mortgage borrowers who are at risk of foreclosure was floated at a Senate Banking Committee hearing Thursday. </p>

<p>Senator Chris Dodd, the committee chair, said he is working to create a Home Ownership Preservation Corporation, which would purchase mortgage securities that are backed by at-risk, subprime loans from lenders and investors. </p>

<p>This corporation would give these lenders and investors a better price for the securities than they would get if the properties backing them were put through foreclosure. </p>

<p>Additionally the loans on these properties would be restructured so that borrowers could afford the new payments and remain in their homes.</p>

<p><a target="_blank" href="htt://money.cnn.com/2008/01/31/real_estate/subprime_bailout_proposal/index.htm?postversion=2008013116">http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/31/real_estate/subprime_bailout_proposal/index.htm</a></p>
 
This kind of bailout proposal really annoys me. These people bought homes they could not afford, and now they are occupying housing stock that rightfully belongs to people who were financially prudent and could afford the property.
 
<p>$20 Billion? Is that enough? What about Alt-A and Prime? Are those folks going to get a break when their Option ARMs start resetting too?</p>

<p>The FDIC website has today's speech by the head of the FDIC when she appeared before Dodd's committee. From reading it, $20 Billion won't even cover the wound, much less stop the bleeding. Yay for the Democrat Senator who wants to socialize the losses in the name of saving the people with bad credit from suffering the consequences of not paying their bills.</p>

<p>We really need a vomit smiley</p>
 
Trying to tap into home equity? We'll see.

Countrywide and others tell thousands of homeowners that they can no longer borrow against their credit lines as the companies tighten standards.

By Kathy M. Kristof and E. Scott Reckard, Los Angeles Times Staff Writers


1:44 PM PST, January 31, 2008

Tens of thousands of homeowners with home equity lines of credit are getting a rude surprise: They've been told by their lender that they can no longer take money out on their credit lines because sinking home prices have put them "upside down" on their mortgages.





Countrywide Financial Corp. sent letters to 122,000 customers last week telling them they could no longer borrow against their credit lines because the total debt on the home exceeded the market value of the property. The lender says it is using computer modeling to determine which of its customers would have their cash spigot shut off.



...




<a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-loans1feb01,0,6255734.story">http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-loans1feb01,0,6255734.story</a>
 
<p>A very interesting tidbit in the LA Times article I just posted:</p>

<p>"Among the lenders tightening as the Fed loosens, Chase Home Lending, which has been slowly raising credit standards since last summer, will start imposing new guidelines Monday that further restrict who will be granted a home equity line, the company said. This week, California homeowners can tap as much as 90% of the equity in their homes. Starting Monday, however, Chase won't let homeowners in certain parts of the state -- including Los Angeles, <strong>Orange</strong> and Imperial counties -- borrow more than 70% of the value of their homes."</p>

<p>Hmmmmmmmmm, seems like Chase Home Lending thinks prices could fall another 30%.


</p>
 
Back
Top