lawyerliz_IHB
New member
<p>That's not too bad. I'd guess the insurance here would be oh, say 3-4 times that. They won't insure a house without windstorm; whereas I understand that you can get homeowners without earthquake insurance there. Correct me if I'm wrong. My house is insured for about 289 or so (most of the property's value is in the acreage.) and at the moment the insurance is five grand, but after an inspection, the charge will probably come down a grand. Our deductible is 2%, but we are only insured for 80 of the building. Which means that if it's only 80% destroyed, we get the whole amount, less the deductible.</p>
<p>Oops, your hypotheical house is probably uninsurable here. Most insurers won't insure all wood houses. It's ok to have an upper floor made of wood, which is how my house is built. Theoretically, you can have a wood house that is just as strong as a CBS house, but that's if you can get good quality construction. Hah. Janet Reno's all wood house, built by her dad, stood up to Andrew just fine, tho it wasn't in the worst area. Also, you have to maintain them, and make sure they aren't lunch for termites.</p>
<p>Wood is more resistant to earthquakes?</p>
<p>Oops, your hypotheical house is probably uninsurable here. Most insurers won't insure all wood houses. It's ok to have an upper floor made of wood, which is how my house is built. Theoretically, you can have a wood house that is just as strong as a CBS house, but that's if you can get good quality construction. Hah. Janet Reno's all wood house, built by her dad, stood up to Andrew just fine, tho it wasn't in the worst area. Also, you have to maintain them, and make sure they aren't lunch for termites.</p>
<p>Wood is more resistant to earthquakes?</p>