The Bill Gross article linked to <a href="http://www.pimco.com/LeftNav/Featured+Market+Commentary/IO/2007/IO+September+2007.htm">here </a>is a good read on our current problems. His proposed solutions are the worst I have read to date, but it is to be expected from a guy who wants to see lower interest rates to help him sell bonds.
<a href="http://www.pimco.com/LeftNav/Featured+Market+Commentary/IO/2007/IO+September+2007.htm"><strong>Where’s Waldo?
Where’s W?</strong></a>
I have stated in other places that any bailout would be a thinly veiled handout to the lending industry. Here is more evidence:
<em>The ultimate solution, it seems to me, must not emanate from the bowels of Fed headquarters on Constitution Avenue, but from the West Wing of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Fiscal, not monetary policy should be the preferred remedy, one scaling Rooseveltian proportions emblematic of the RFC, or perhaps to be more current, the RTC in the early 1990s when the government absorbed the bad debts of the failing savings and loan industry. Why is it possible to rescue corrupt S&L buccaneers in the early 1990s and provide guidance to levered Wall Street investment bankers during the 1998 LTCM crisis, yet throw 2,000,000 homeowners to the wolves in 2007? If we can bail out Chrysler, why can’t we support the American homeowner?
</em>Notice the BS attempt to link the bailout to homeowners when the real beneficiaries will be the lenders? Expect to see more of this.