Headlines...

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
<p><em>For anyone out there who is keeping up with this, what are you doing to prepare yourself financially.</em></p>

<p>Sitting in the garage, wallowing in my recent poor-yielding short t-bills, and drowning my sorrows away. </p>
 
IMO, short t-bills are a great choice at this juncture, but what if Ben starts up the helicopters? And China and Japan do not have to actually sell their t notes to unload. It seems most of their bonds are short term and all they have to do is redeem them.<p>

I do remember that this is an housing blog, but it seems to me these news bits have huge influences on the housing situation.
 
<p>OK, so it's a spoof, but funny nonetheless.....</p>

<p><a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/news_briefs/greenspan_comes_out_of">Greenspan Comes Out Of Retirement For One More Interest Rate Hike | The Onion - America's Finest News Source</a></p>
 
<p>Keep'em coming</p>

<p><a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/finance/news/topnews/*http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/070625/economy.html?.v=14">Weak Housing Market Scares Away Buyers</a> </p>

<p> </p>
 
I'm on the prowl again.



<a href="http://www.reuters.com/news/video/videoStory?videoId=58077">http://www.reuters.com/news/video/videoStory?videoId=58077</a>



<a href="http://summitnotebook.reuters.com/2007/06/25/audio-homebuilder-cfo-on-florida-deals-awful-timing/">http://summitnotebook.reuters.com/2007/06/25/audio-homebuilder-cfo-on-florida-deals-awful-timing/</a>
 
<p><strong>From Bob Chapman: The International Forecaster</strong></p>

<p><em>“In this regard hedge funds abuse their shareholders in arbitrarily assigning value to these financial instruments. The rip off can be huge because no one knows what the market value is unless they are sold. The management is compensated by fees on the values of their portfolios and that says it all. As it’s called, “marking by model,” is a scam, and we have said this for years – since 1994. We have also asserted that hedge funds and other financial entities should be forced to reveal unrealized gains on derivatives in their statements to customers and regulators. The red flag is gains that occur late in the quarter, or at yearend. Theoretically a fund could general(ize, JB ) ill-gotten gains via “marking by model” on derivates and indefinitely “roll” those gains into the future. The Fed and Treasury have prevented scrutiny, regulation and curtailment of derivatives because financial entities can manufacture earnings from the “marking by model” of derivatives. This is the glue that is holding world markets together. This is how they have prevented collapses of the financial system. No regulation – no oversight. When called upon by Treasury, Fed or their British counterparts enter markets at their direction. On paper everyone involved gets rich, especially the brokerage houses taking the orders. This is the biggest financial scam in history.”</em></p>
 
Pimco's Gross Sees Global Growth Hurting Long-Term Bond Yields





<em>"e stressed that he remains bullish on bonds short-term, but turned bearish on yields three-to-five years out.</em>

<p class="textBodyBlack"><em>“These increases in rates over the past few days have placed the 30-year mortgage market at close to 7% in conventional terms,” said Gross, chief investment officer for Pacific Investment Management Co. and manager of the world's largest bond fund. “This will decimate the housing market if it wasn’t already decimated before, and certainly put the Fed on hold, and maybe allow the Fed to reduce rates…six to nine months from now.”</em></p>
 
<p><strong><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070626/bs_nm/countrywide_dc_2">Ex-Countrywide execs plead guilty to insider trading</a></strong></p>

<p>Wow, now isn't that a shock?</p>
 
I can't wait to see how much deeper they dig on this. I have a feeling that alot of the housing industry companies could be found to have ran similar schemes.
 
awgee,





I don't have a NYT account (yes, I know it's free).





Bear Stearns has one "behind the curtain" to the tune of $7Billion. Last time they went for cash, they got 80 or 85 cents on the dollar for AAA. I wonder how they'll fair scrounging up cash for this one.





http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=agGitLyUP71Q&refer=home
 
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/25w3r5"><strong><a href="http://tinyurl.com/25w3r5?">http://tinyurl.com/25w3r5</a> Inventories to pressure homebuilders' cash flow - Marketwatch.</strong></a> </p>

<p>After you read that keep in mind housing starts haven't really slowed down that much.


</p>

<p> </p>
 
<strong><a href="http://www.pimco.com/LeftNav/Featured+Market+Commentary/IO/2007/IO+July+2007.htm?ref=patrick.net">Looking for Contagion in All the Wrong Places</a>





</strong>

<p align="justify" class="Noparagraphstyle" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>

<p align="justify" class="Noparagraphstyle" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong style="">The right places to look for contagion are therefore not in the white-washed Bear Stearns hedge funds, but in the subprime resets to come and the ultimate effect they will have on the prices of homes – the collateral that’s so critical in this asset-backed, and therefore interest-sensitive financed-based economy of 2007 and beyond.</strong> If delinquencies lead to defaults and then to lower home prices, then we have problems and the potential for an extended – not a 27-day Paris Hilton sentence. Take a look at Chart 1, which graphically points out the deterioration in subprime ARM delinquencies.





</p>

<p align="center" class="Noparagraphstyle" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><img border="0" alt="" src="http://www.pimco.com/NR/rdonlyres/D1F01FBD-786F-4CF7-811C-EBCDB7B6CCE1/4184/chart1.gif" /></p>



<p align="justify" class="Noparagraphstyle" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">Escalating delinquencies of course ultimately lead to escalating defaults. Currently 7% of subprime loans are in default. The percentage will grow and grow like a weed in your backyard tomato patch. Now I, the curmudgeon of credit, am as sure of this as I am that the sun will set in the west. The uncertain part is by how much. But look at it this way: using the current default rate of 7% (3-4% total losses), the holders of some BBB investment grade subprime-based CDOs will lose all of their moolah because of the significant leverage. No need to worry about fictitious 100 cents on the dollar marks here. One hundred percent of nothing equals nothing. If subprime total losses hit 10% then even some single-A tranches face the grim reaper. AAA’s? Folks the point is that there are hundreds of billions of dollars of this toxic waste and whether or not they’re in CDOs or Bear Stearns hedge funds matters only to the extent of the <u style="">timing</u> of the unwind. To death and taxes you can add this to your list of inevitabilities: the subprime crisis is not an isolated event and it won’t be contained by a few days of headlines in <em style="">The New York Times</em>. And it will not remain confined to a neat little Petri dish in some mad financial derivative scientist’s laboratory. Ultimately through capital market arbitrage it will affect risk spreads in markets completely divorced from U.S. housing. What has the Brazilian Real to do with U.S. subprimes? Nothing except many of the same bets are held in hedge funds that by prudence or necessity will reduce their risk budgets to stay afloat. And the U.S. economy? Of course it will be affected. Consumption will be reduced to say nothing of new home construction over the next 12-18 months. After all, attractive subprime pricing has been key to the housing market’s success in recent years. Now that has disappeared. <strong style="">Importantly, as well, and this point is neglected by most pundits, the willingness to extend credit in other areas – high yield, bank loans, and even certain segments of the AAA asset-backed commercial paper market should feel the cooling Arctic winds of a liquidity constriction</strong>.</p>

<p align="justify" class="Noparagraphstyle" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>

<p align="justify" class="Noparagraphstyle" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong style="">If not taken too far – and there is no hint yet of a true “crisis” – these developments may be just what the Fed has been looking for: easy credit becoming less easy; excessive liquidity returning to more rational levels</strong>. Still, PIMCO looks for the Fed to issue an insurance policy in the form of lower Fed Funds at some point over the next 6 months. And what happened to our glass half-full secular thesis of last month? We still believe in strong global growth, but…as we also suggested…that the U.S. housing downturn will affect growth <u style="">and</u> short-term yields over the next year or so. We remain consistent and resolute. Contagion? Maybe, but you won’t be finding it at “99.9%” pure Bear Stearns. Look for it instead, in the subprimely financed homes of Las Vegas, Rockford, Illinois, and Miami, Florida. This problem – aided and abetted by Wall Street – ultimately resides in America’s heartland, with millions and millions of overpriced homes and asset-backed collateral with a different address – Main Street. </p>

<p class="Noparagraphstyle" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>

<p class="Noparagraphstyle" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">William H. Gross</p>

<p class="Noparagraphstyle" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">Managing Director</p>
 
<p>KB reported a loss of $148.7 million, or $1.93 per share, for the period ended May 31. A year ago, the company posted net income of $205.4 million, or $2.45 per share.</p>

<p><a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/finance/news/topnews/*http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/070628/earns_kb_home.html?.v=9">KB Home Swings to 2Q Loss on Charges</a> </p>

<p> </p>
 
I know Mr. Gross is extremely intelligent and manages a few billion dollars, <strong>but</strong>, yes, here comes the <strong>but</strong>, my experience is that he is better at analyzing past and present events as opposed to prediction. I have noticed that his predictions are wrong more often than right. And I think the "contagion" and the greatest devastation will be in the over the counter derivatives market itself and not in the housing market. Yea, I think the housing market is going to suffer, and suffer big time, but as regards actual dollar amounts, the derivative market is larger and has farther to fall, and may even be more leveraged. On the other hand, it may not matter, as the two markets are so interconnected that it is all just one big beast, and an ugly beast at that.
 
Anyone see in the OC Register where IMPAC has stopped payment on it's dividend and has over $1 billion in loans that are over 60 days past due?
 
<p>Mino2126 - IMPAC (IMH) is screwed. Keep an eye also on American Home (AHM), Novastar Financial (NFI), and Fremont (FMT). The subprime mess is killing them, and they aren't as big as Wells Fargo or Bear Stearns enough to withstand the foreclosure onslaught.</p>

<p>For homebuilders, watch Beazer (BZH). They just fired their CFO for shredding documents. They are being investigated and sued for predatory lending. It seems that one of their developments has as high as a 20% foreclosure rate. That is some stinky shit.</p>

<p>In fact, all this shit keeps getting stinkier. The market/media gets used to the smell now and then and it subsides, but when you move, you get another fresh whiff and realize you can't get away from it.</p>
 
Oh yes I am watching all the home builders just weep in their own misery. I am really interested to see how the SEC probe into the BS hedge funds that about flopped comes out. I have a feeling that it's about to get real squirmy on Wall Street and Helicopter Ben and Mr. Paulson are going to be eating crow pie after it's all said in done.
 
Back
Top