[quote author="graphrix" date=1247497067]I'm late to the game in this thread, and I will be honest... I don't have the time to read all the links. But, after poking around the <a href="http://www.abiworld.org/">ABI</a> site, <a href="http://www.buffalonews.com/149/story/729251.html">I did find this article</a>, and this point...
<em>The first nationwide study on medical causes of bankruptcy (released June 4 by Harvard Law School, Harvard Medical School and Ohio University) found that <strong>62.1 percent</strong> of all bankruptcies filed in <strong>2007 were related to medical problems</strong>. This represents a <strong>50 percent increase since 2001</strong>.</em>
So in 2001 there were nearly twice as many BKs as 2007, but the medical reasons for BKs continued to increase. What am I missing here? Either I am missing the point, or really medical reasons are the main cause of BKs, at least for the increase in BKs.</blockquote>
I am so sorry, but I just do not see what this shite even has to do with if health reform is a good thing for this country and exactly what that reform should be. And here is why:
1. What if Canada's BK laws are totally different than ours - well, that could skew the stats.
2. What if Canada's welfare programs and unemployment programs are totally different than ours - well, that could skew the stats.
3. What if Canadian credit card companies are more willing to work with defaulters than US companies - well, that could skew the stats.
4. What if Canadian families are more willing to take in family members down on their luck - well, then that could skew the stats.
5. What if, What if, What if......
I think this debate over who filed more bankruptcies is just a load of crap, and a tangent that does nothing to help solve our extensive problems.