Wow... quite the weekend it's been, eh? After catching up on all the blog comments and threads here, I'm still not sure I completely understand the business.
So correct me if i'm wrong, but my understanding of the relationship is:
- <em>"Zovall and I are going to do what we have been doing, and we are going to give Shevy customer leads."</em>
- <em>"I wanted to find someone who would provide the services I thought were important like providing value estimates, analyzing investment properties, and giving a realistic evaluation of the market. Shevy does this."</em>
The main problem I see is not so much a conflict-of-interest as in a lack of value to the client. To me, the value having IHB involved in a transaction is IR's research and analysis, not Shevy's.
<strong>Million dollar question:</strong> Would I be getting IR's personal expertise, analysis, and opinion on my transaction? Or is he merely the source of the referral?
If the answer is no, that's the most glaring thing in my opinion. While it's true that IR's work here has earned our trust and respect, it doesn't mean his credibility is transferrable to just anyone. Yes, his referral does have some weight... but the key word is: <em>some</em>. At this point, the connection between IHB and Shevy is still vague. All we know is IR met him a few months ago and was impressed. It doesn't help that what content is available on Shevy's site isn't up to the standards that most of us are accustomed to from IR.
BV is right in that we should give Shevy the benefit of the doubt. But Ipop's also right -- hey, you guys taught us to doubt in the first place! If Shevy's got the goods, let him be free to come here to the forums. It's unfair to characterize the readership as an angry mob that would tear him apart, otherwise how would one explain the overwhelming goodwill that IR2 has earned. If he's the guy doing all the leg work, the main concern of a client shouldn't be whether they trust IR/Z, but do they trust Shevy?
In general, it's all gotten way too personal on both sides. IR/Z doesn't <em>owe</em> the readership some answers, but I'm surprised they wouldn't <em>want</em> to address the concerns of this large pre-built base of word-of-mouth marketers and potential clients. The take-it-or-leave-it attitude is surprising. Conversely, it's out of line to call anyone involved a sell-out or question their integrity. But it should be fair game to ask, "<strong>Where's the beef?!</strong>"