BuddyLeo said:
I support Mandy's comments.
I think Stonegate has better amenities than Pavilion Park. PP has only 1 park/pool for the entire 5 communities of builders. It may look nice now because people have not fully moved in. Wait a few months later when you try to take your kids to the pool and find that it's like the community pool, you will think different.
At Stonegate, there are at least 4 pools and 4 parks spread out allowing people to easily walk their kids there no matter where they live. Also, the school is in the heart of it all so you don't have to drive your kids every morning.
It seems Stonegate has some great advantages.
Using IC's (a SG resident) #s - listed below. SG has ~3000 units. PP has ~700 units. SG has 4 pools (according to you). PP has 1 pool (fact). Do the math on the ratio. PP comes out ahead. Not to mention - some backyards at PP allow you to build a pool so you can probably subtract those people out from pool usage. No backyard at SG does.
For the record, I agree that I think the amenities are nicer at SG. More choices in parks and an on-site elem school are definitely better than 1 park and no on-site elem school but let's be accurate on the facts. It doesn't matter that PP is a community of 8 builders (yes it's 8 and not the 5 you mentioned) versus SG with 3 builders. It's about the # of units and # of families using the facilities that you are trying to compare. That's why these posts from SG residents championing for their village are so painful to read. They're laden with inaccurate information. #annoying
Irvinecommuter said:
Don't know if these figures are accurate but:
Stonegate ? Irvine, California
418 Acres, 3,000 Dwelling Units, The Irvine Company
Also...does the 3000 units include apartments?