$47k is the dual motor long range, your screen shot
$40k is the rwd, the cheaper option
Experts admit global warming predictions wrong
- Thread starter Liar Loan
- Start date
NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
$40k is the rwd, the cheaper option
Really do feel sorry for your fam and kids. Condolences to them…
$40k is the rwd, the cheaper option
Didn’t you get the memo. No one cares.In the car this second to my daughters convocation honors ceremony..valedictorian….super proud and she is extremely happy thanks
irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
Uh... you need to use current inventory for the discounted models.
But even $50k is less than $100k.
But even $50k is less than $100k.
Yeah, I have no clue what you’re on at this point as most of what you post are pointless.was responding to you
Really do feel sorry for your fam and kids. Condolences to them…
morekaos
Well-known member
All a scam…
On global warming, so many problems with the data
It is hard to find any data to support what we have been told about temperatures and the climate, yet, we repeatedly see the talking point that “the science is settled” and people saying the dire predictions have been true.
Here is a report that shows that Arctic Ice, which has only been measured since 1981, is melting slower than normal, because it is cooler than normal. And that it is at 95% of the average. 5.4 million square miles vs. 5.67 million square miles.
We have been told for years that we would have snowless winters, not that sometimes we would have record snows as we did out west this year.
We have been told that oceans are rising rapidly, and coastal cities would soon be underwater, not that they have risen an essentially immeasurable 9 inches in 140 years.
The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, which involved more than a thousand experts, estimated an extinction rate that was later calculated at up to 8,700 species a year, or 24 a day. More recently, scientists at the U.N. Convention on Biological Diversity concluded that: “Every day, up to 150 species are lost.” That could be as much as 10 percent a decade.
Yet only about 800 extinctions have been documented in the past 400 years.
“There are almost no empirical data to support estimates of current extinctions of 100, or even one, species a day,” he concluded.
Here are some of the destructive policies of the radical greenies that are based on predictions, not scientific data:
The destruction of energy-producing companies that produce reasonably priced energy. (They clearly don’t care about the harm to the poor and middle class by high inflation).
The promotion of the highly flammable pollutant lithium while seeking to control CO2, a non-pollutant, clear gas, that makes plants grow and allows the world to be fed.
Spending trillions on carbon capture.
Selling worthless carbon credits so people like John Kerry can pretend they care as they fly in their private jets.
Outlawing gas stoves, furnaces, lawn mowers, leaf blowers, and gas grills.
The destruction of fishing and killing of whales by wind farms.
Environmentalists claim to worry about landfills and pollution so where are they going to put all the gas- powered equipment which will be worthless when the wind turbines wear out?
Why should anyone trust the same people who did the following when they said they could control temperatures, sea levels, and storm activity, if we just hand over trillions, and give up our freedom and quality of life?
They lied that we could keep our health plan, doctor, and premiums would go down.
They lied throughout COVID and then claimed to be surprised when children became depressed, and their test scores went down.
They refused to control the border but lied that the border was closed.
They supported soft on crime district attorneys but claimed they weren’t soft on crime even as crime goes up.
They lied continuously to destroy Trump without evidence and refused to support his policies which were lifting all races.
They lied to get the corrupt, incompetent Biden into office.
https://2d680527.isolation.zscaler....39203f7e7a8066a407481cdfd4f22f393c29638abecf3
On global warming, so many problems with the data
It is hard to find any data to support what we have been told about temperatures and the climate, yet, we repeatedly see the talking point that “the science is settled” and people saying the dire predictions have been true.
Here is a report that shows that Arctic Ice, which has only been measured since 1981, is melting slower than normal, because it is cooler than normal. And that it is at 95% of the average. 5.4 million square miles vs. 5.67 million square miles.
We have been told for years that we would have snowless winters, not that sometimes we would have record snows as we did out west this year.
We have been told that oceans are rising rapidly, and coastal cities would soon be underwater, not that they have risen an essentially immeasurable 9 inches in 140 years.
The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, which involved more than a thousand experts, estimated an extinction rate that was later calculated at up to 8,700 species a year, or 24 a day. More recently, scientists at the U.N. Convention on Biological Diversity concluded that: “Every day, up to 150 species are lost.” That could be as much as 10 percent a decade.
Yet only about 800 extinctions have been documented in the past 400 years.
“There are almost no empirical data to support estimates of current extinctions of 100, or even one, species a day,” he concluded.
Here are some of the destructive policies of the radical greenies that are based on predictions, not scientific data:
The destruction of energy-producing companies that produce reasonably priced energy. (They clearly don’t care about the harm to the poor and middle class by high inflation).
The promotion of the highly flammable pollutant lithium while seeking to control CO2, a non-pollutant, clear gas, that makes plants grow and allows the world to be fed.
Spending trillions on carbon capture.
Selling worthless carbon credits so people like John Kerry can pretend they care as they fly in their private jets.
Outlawing gas stoves, furnaces, lawn mowers, leaf blowers, and gas grills.
The destruction of fishing and killing of whales by wind farms.
Environmentalists claim to worry about landfills and pollution so where are they going to put all the gas- powered equipment which will be worthless when the wind turbines wear out?
Why should anyone trust the same people who did the following when they said they could control temperatures, sea levels, and storm activity, if we just hand over trillions, and give up our freedom and quality of life?
They lied that we could keep our health plan, doctor, and premiums would go down.
They lied throughout COVID and then claimed to be surprised when children became depressed, and their test scores went down.
They refused to control the border but lied that the border was closed.
They supported soft on crime district attorneys but claimed they weren’t soft on crime even as crime goes up.
They lied continuously to destroy Trump without evidence and refused to support his policies which were lifting all races.
They lied to get the corrupt, incompetent Biden into office.
https://2d680527.isolation.zscaler....39203f7e7a8066a407481cdfd4f22f393c29638abecf3
what's really (and literal) scam is the oil industry!
www.whistleblowers.org
Combatting Fraud in the Oil and Gas Industry - NWC
The oil and gas industry is facing unprecedented financial challenges. Learn about likely frauds and what can be done to hold fraudulent actors accountable.
www.whistleblowers.org
morekaos
Well-known member
Typically the majority of your posts are pointless and biased (ie using 1979 stated science to prove a point), but when it comes to economics (and finance), it’s a little more relevant. But to say gas prices are correlated to an election is funny.
Oil companies have triggers in place that benefits them (at the expense of consumers, just like the current situation where they blame refineries as if it’s completely out of their forecast), and voila, record profits.
Just for kicks, looking at historical prices:
Clinton’s era was consistently under $2, it was until Bush jr did it shot up. Thanks to Obama did it go down significantly. Trumps second half shot up. Thanks to Biden did it go down again…
So what you’re really saying you actually want and support Republicans for your oil portfolio. Dems actually bring prices down.
Oil companies have triggers in place that benefits them (at the expense of consumers, just like the current situation where they blame refineries as if it’s completely out of their forecast), and voila, record profits.
Just for kicks, looking at historical prices:
Clinton’s era was consistently under $2, it was until Bush jr did it shot up. Thanks to Obama did it go down significantly. Trumps second half shot up. Thanks to Biden did it go down again…
So what you’re really saying you actually want and support Republicans for your oil portfolio. Dems actually bring prices down.
Clearly I posted my point with backup, you then posted which supports my point, and you even agree, vote dem!Clearly lower under the Republicans than the Democrats but if you can’t believe your own eyes, there’s nothing I can do for you…. keep voting in the Newsomes and Gascons…..enjoy