irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
That's what I heard too... maybe the PDF implies that Carmel II is only occupying the north side of the parcel and the ones south next to Trabuco will be something else.
irvinehomeowner said:That's what I heard too... maybe the PDF implies that Carmel II is only occupying the north side of the parcel and the ones south next to Trabuco will be something else.
gaab said:Just taking a SWAG at the price - but - based on other threads, it looks like plan 3 would be about 1.2 million (using $340/sq ft) + landscaping + interior = ~1.3 million ? Does that seem about right ?
Question - are these larger lots considered large enough for an in-ground pool ?
nytransplant said:Did they say how many homes were in carmel II. I might be reading too much into it but If you look at the map it looks like they might only be offering a few homes in the lots right above the pocket pool/park.
PPBABA said:nytransplant said:Did they say how many homes were in carmel II. I might be reading too much into it but If you look at the map it looks like they might only be offering a few homes in the lots right above the pocket pool/park.
If my memory serves me right, I heard only 28 more lots for Carmel II when I last spoke to the guys at the sales office.
I thought they were discontinuing Plans 1 and 2 and only building the bigger 3/4s.Irvine2Irvine said:Even Las Colinas is getting back in the action at Portola Springs this fall. Earlier this year, they were offering $45K in upgrade credit to clear the inventory. Now, their plan 1 starts at high $900K
irvinehomeowner said:I thought they were discontinuing Plans 1 and 2 and only building the bigger 3/4s.Irvine2Irvine said:Even Las Colinas is getting back in the action at Portola Springs this fall. Earlier this year, they were offering $45K in upgrade credit to clear the inventory. Now, their plan 1 starts at high $900K
lula said:They are not going to build las colinas plan 2 simply because they can't fit a house that long in the new Carmel I-sized lots. OK, the lots look a little bit bigger than carmel I, but still no velodrome for them either! Oh, and their plan 1 is now a 4/4, so it doesn't have a 3 car garage any more.
That doesn't show on the TIC website... but if you go to Taylor Morrison's, you can see the difference and it's an improvement:lula said:Oh, and their plan 1 is now a 4/4, so it doesn't have a 3 car garage any more.
irvinehomeowner said:This doesn't bode well for future SFR 'hoods. If they are pricing these at over $1mil, imagine what Orchard Hills and Laguna Crossing are going be benchmarked at?
I'm wondering what happened to all that foreclosure and high interest rates destruction that was supposed to happen that would bring Irvine prices crashing down to normalcy.
When all is said and done with upgrades and landscaping, expect that those Carmel II homes will be $1.2m+. I think that there is about 5-10% possible downside for Irvine prices if we hit a soft patch in the economy and that's with rates heading into the high 3% range (10%+ if we get a double dip recession). The next 6-12 months will be interesting.iacrenter said:irvinehomeowner said:This doesn't bode well for future SFR 'hoods. If they are pricing these at over $1mil, imagine what Orchard Hills and Laguna Crossing are going be benchmarked at?
I'm wondering what happened to all that foreclosure and high interest rates destruction that was supposed to happen that would bring Irvine prices crashing down to normalcy.
$1M+ for Carmel II homes! I refuse to drink anymore TIC koolaid.
I will be a patient renter for now and see how the Irvine market shakes out over the next 12-24 months. There seems to be little downside to waiting and saving.
So while I'm okay with the lot sizes in Woodbury... I just don't think the home layouts are sufficient. It's bad enough I have no backyard... but don't take away my 2nd dining area, my 2nd living area and my 3rd car garage.
There are recently built homes in Irvine that have those things on sub 5000sft lots (Los Colinas for example).Chitown said:So while I'm okay with the lot sizes in Woodbury... I just don't think the home layouts are sufficient. It's bad enough I have no backyard... but don't take away my 2nd dining area, my 2nd living area and my 3rd car garage.
I think your 2nd dining area, 2nd living area and 3rd car garage are taken away because lots are small. This way they can have a plan that appears and feels more spacious.