irvinehomeowner said:LL predicting pain in chips?
Now it all makes sense.
momopi said:Inland areas of California are subject to huge swings as well. Riverside County, Palm Springs, etc.
I've seen small SFR's in Riverside County area appreciate >400% from 2012-2022. I suspect it will crash hard in down cycle.
what stock doesn?t go down significantly during a recession?Liar Loan said:irvinehomeowner said:LL predicting pain in chips?
Now it all makes sense.
Not me. The stock market. AMD has a history of losing 90-95% of it's value during recessions.
momopi said:Inland areas of California are subject to huge swings as well. Riverside County, Palm Springs, etc.
I've seen small SFR's in Riverside County area appreciate >400% from 2012-2022. I suspect it will crash hard in down cycle.
I completely agree. This is why I sold my inland multi-families.
You can get rich quick during the upcycles - my properties more than doubled in price in five years while throwing off tons of cashflow - but you can also get absolutely destroyed during downturns.
sleepy5136 said:what stock doesn?t go down significantly during a recession?Liar Loan said:irvinehomeowner said:LL predicting pain in chips?
Now it all makes sense.
Not me. The stock market. AMD has a history of losing 90-95% of it's value during recessions.
momopi said:Inland areas of California are subject to huge swings as well. Riverside County, Palm Springs, etc.
I've seen small SFR's in Riverside County area appreciate >400% from 2012-2022. I suspect it will crash hard in down cycle.
I completely agree. This is why I sold my inland multi-families.
You can get rich quick during the upcycles - my properties more than doubled in price in five years while throwing off tons of cashflow - but you can also get absolutely destroyed during downturns.
time in market > timing the marketLiar Loan said:sleepy5136 said:what stock doesn?t go down significantly during a recession?Liar Loan said:irvinehomeowner said:LL predicting pain in chips?
Now it all makes sense.
Not me. The stock market. AMD has a history of losing 90-95% of it's value during recessions.
momopi said:Inland areas of California are subject to huge swings as well. Riverside County, Palm Springs, etc.
I've seen small SFR's in Riverside County area appreciate >400% from 2012-2022. I suspect it will crash hard in down cycle.
I completely agree. This is why I sold my inland multi-families.
You can get rich quick during the upcycles - my properties more than doubled in price in five years while throwing off tons of cashflow - but you can also get absolutely destroyed during downturns.
Most stocks don't lose 90-95% of their value. The chart on AMD also looks horrific. You should at least wait until it shows some price stability, which could be a long time. Right now, it looks like a falling knife.
sleepy5136 said:time in market > timing the marketLiar Loan said:sleepy5136 said:what stock doesn?t go down significantly during a recession?Liar Loan said:irvinehomeowner said:LL predicting pain in chips?
Now it all makes sense.
Not me. The stock market. AMD has a history of losing 90-95% of it's value during recessions.
momopi said:Inland areas of California are subject to huge swings as well. Riverside County, Palm Springs, etc.
I've seen small SFR's in Riverside County area appreciate >400% from 2012-2022. I suspect it will crash hard in down cycle.
I completely agree. This is why I sold my inland multi-families.
You can get rich quick during the upcycles - my properties more than doubled in price in five years while throwing off tons of cashflow - but you can also get absolutely destroyed during downturns.
Most stocks don't lose 90-95% of their value. The chart on AMD also looks horrific. You should at least wait until it shows some price stability, which could be a long time. Right now, it looks like a falling knife.
Agree to disagree. Feel free to read this article and let me know how 'Peter Perfect' in the article fairs compared to 'Ashley Action'.https://www.schwab.com/resource-center/insights/content/does-market-timing-workLiar Loan said:sleepy5136 said:time in market > timing the marketLiar Loan said:sleepy5136 said:what stock doesn?t go down significantly during a recession?Liar Loan said:irvinehomeowner said:LL predicting pain in chips?
Now it all makes sense.
Not me. The stock market. AMD has a history of losing 90-95% of it's value during recessions.
momopi said:Inland areas of California are subject to huge swings as well. Riverside County, Palm Springs, etc.
I've seen small SFR's in Riverside County area appreciate >400% from 2012-2022. I suspect it will crash hard in down cycle.
I completely agree. This is why I sold my inland multi-families.
You can get rich quick during the upcycles - my properties more than doubled in price in five years while throwing off tons of cashflow - but you can also get absolutely destroyed during downturns.
Most stocks don't lose 90-95% of their value. The chart on AMD also looks horrific. You should at least wait until it shows some price stability, which could be a long time. Right now, it looks like a falling knife.
I fundamentally disagree with this statement.
Long term, it?s almost always better to invest in stocks?even at the worst time each year?than not to invest at all.
sleepy5136 said:Agree to disagree. Feel free to read this article and let me know how 'Peter Perfect' in the article fairs compared to 'Ashley Action'.https://www.schwab.com/resource-center/insights/content/does-market-timing-work
The article is based on a 20 period timeline. Also, you do know its impossible to time the market right? I hope you don't feel that it's possible. So based off of that understanding, are you really going to tell me you would not have invested from 2000-2011? Or even worse, you are going to tell me you would have intelligently timed your stock purchases at the bottom of every major correction/dip and intelligently sell at the absolute top to get max ROI? If so, you are a genius and I would be shocked as to why you're lurking here.Kenkoko said:sleepy5136 said:Agree to disagree. Feel free to read this article and let me know how 'Peter Perfect' in the article fairs compared to 'Ashley Action'.https://www.schwab.com/resource-center/insights/content/does-market-timing-work
This article purposely picked the year 2000 as the starting point to make their point. If they used 1990 as their starting point, the results would have been very different.
Here's why
Year - Average Annual Return
1989 - 1999: 15.9%
2000 - 2011: -0.95%
2011 - 2021: 11.5%
I also fundamentally disagree with your statement that time in market > timing the market.
sleepy5136 said:The article is based on a 20 period timeline. Also, you do know its impossible to time the market right? I hope you don't feel that it's possible. So based off of that understanding, are you really going to tell me you would not have invested from 2000-2011? Or even worse, you are going to tell me you would have intelligently timed your stock purchases at the bottom of every major correction/dip and intelligently sell at the absolute top to get max ROI? If so, you are a genius and I would be shocked as to why you're lurking here.Kenkoko said:sleepy5136 said:Agree to disagree. Feel free to read this article and let me know how 'Peter Perfect' in the article fairs compared to 'Ashley Action'.https://www.schwab.com/resource-center/insights/content/does-market-timing-work
This article purposely picked the year 2000 as the starting point to make their point. If they used 1990 as their starting point, the results would have been very different.
Here's why
Year - Average Annual Return
1989 - 1999: 15.9%
2000 - 2011: -0.95%
2011 - 2021: 11.5%
I also fundamentally disagree with your statement that time in market > timing the market.
Liar Loan said:I'm seeing a lot of red in Arizona (not to mention SoCal).
irvinehomeowner said:Or worse... Larry Linger which happens to many people.
Fundamentals are great for attempting to forecast... but housing has too many non-fundamental factors... especially in micro markets... so over the long haul, as the article says:
Long term, it?s almost always better to invest in stocks?even at the worst time each year?than not to invest at all.
I forgot if it was Happy Days or Joanie Loves Chachi but someone said "One day, you will be bigger than the pain.".
USCTrojanCPA said:You are damn right that residential real estate has way too many non economic factors. Heck, take me for example....I'm looking for a single story 3-car wide garage view lot home with a pool south of the 405 or somewhat of a unicorn. You know how many homes I've made offers on in the 18 months? 3 because nothing else was of interest to me. I can wait for the market to dip but what happens when there's nothing that I like to buy? Am I supposed to buy something that I don't really want or settle? I don't think so.
USCTrojanCPA said:irvinehomeowner said:Or worse... Larry Linger which happens to many people.
Fundamentals are great for attempting to forecast... but housing has too many non-fundamental factors... especially in micro markets... so over the long haul, as the article says:
Long term, it?s almost always better to invest in stocks?even at the worst time each year?than not to invest at all.
I forgot if it was Happy Days or Joanie Loves Chachi but someone said "One day, you will be bigger than the pain.".
You are damn right that residential real estate has way too many non economic factors. Heck, take me for example....I'm looking for a single story 3-car wide garage view lot home with a pool south of the 405 or somewhat of a unicorn. You know how many homes I've made offers on in the 18 months? 3 because nothing else was of interest to me. I can wait for the market to dip but what happens when there's nothing that I like to buy? Am I supposed to buy something that I don't really want or settle? I don't think so.