Affordable Housing next to PP

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program

test

Well-known member
Awwwwwwkward.  I bet buyers weren't expecting this.  Maybe PP should install a gate?

123w6dt.jpg

29fbfpu.jpg

20gxuma.jpg




PP will be sandwiched on BOTH sides by LOW INCOME APARTMENTS!

2wm1gjo.jpg




And MORE on the way!  Surrounded on ALL 3 SIDES with low income rentals.

1jou2h.jpg

2rf78tk.jpg



 
Tyler Durden said:
If the developer added more homes, there would be a set aside for affordable housing...that's the way the city could justify it to the folks who didn't want the extra homes to begin with.

Are you saying the "people" in Irvine actually want affordable homes next door to their million dollar homes?  Am I missing something here??  I sure wouldn't want that.
 
bones said:
Good info.

Are all the lots in the above map (1-8) affordable housing?

The way it is labeled it looks like only Lot 6 has that designation. My guess is that would be some higher density product--?attached townhome/condos to achieve a lower price point.

Lot 2-6 look like terrible areas to live given their proximity to the 133. Lot 6 designated affordable housing is the worst location, corner of 133 & Irvine Blvd. Also being adjacent to a "Water Quality Basin" (sounds fishy for a flood control area) doesn't sound good either.
 
bones said:
iacrenter said:
bones said:
Good info.

Are all the lots in the above map (1-8) affordable housing?

The way it is labeled it looks like only Lot 6 has that designation. My guess is that would be some higher density product--?attached townhome/condos to achieve a lower price point.

Lot 2-6 look like terrible areas to live given their proximity to the 133. Lot 6 designated affordable housing is the worst location, corner of 133 & Irvine Blvd.

That's how I read the map too but wasn't sure.  One of the sales people at PP told me there will be some sort of senior housing adjacent to Pavilion Park.  Wonder if that's what one of them will be (maybe lot 1)?

Nice of 5Points to let seniors enjoy exhaust fumes and car noise from the 133.
 
Interesting as how the GP salespeople were touting how they don't have apartments or other high-density housing in their village compared to TIC ones.
 
Per City of Irvine report..."On June 17, FivePoint Communities submitted a revised Irvine Wildlife Corridor Plan to
the City for its review. City staff is currently reviewing the draft document. FivePoint
Communities has also recently reengaged City staff to discuss a process to cooperatively
complete the responses to comments received through the environmental review process.

The affordable housing plan is still awaiting action from FivePoint Communities. No date
for public hearings has been determined. "

Also, per the the website...

"The development plans call for construction of 4,895 homes, a 5-acre police station and 1.2 million square feet of shops, office, institutional and R&D space. ....... Also, 544 apartment units will be built to meet the project?s affordable-housing requirements."
 
thelandofnoland said:
10606431_697804343632914_6575355615281372790_n.jpg


Interesting...

55+ Senior affordable community across the street from Harmony and Melrose? It will be the first one to come to Irvine in nearly 20 years. 221 units expected by 2015, all rental properties.

Amenities:

Pool, Spa, Fitness Center, Putting Green, Bocce Ball Court, and Multi-Purpose Room
 
Irvine City promised the state to provide a minimum quantity of affordable housing for lower income families and age restricts population. To do these the developers must take a huge hit on land value since the products are not market rate. Many may see this as negative adjacencies the developers often use the negative premium locations to justify the uses. City of Irvine has more negotiation leverage with Five Points than other developers therefore we will see more integrated diversities in Great Park.
 
irvinehomeshopper said:
City of Irvine has more negotiation leverage with Five Points than other developers therefore we will see more integrated diversities in Great Park.

A bunch more low income "diversities" will be "integrated" into District 1 North.

1jou2h.jpg


2rf78tk.jpg

 
I've found that the low income housing condos crowd seems to take care of the place nicely and really appreciate that they are living in a good community and take pride in it.

The low income apartments crowd on the other hand, not so much.  At least that's my initial impression from seeing some of each in Columbus Square and Woodbury.  Every time I drive in or around the low income apartments in Woodbury I hear cars with bass bumping and have seen a few shady characters milling around. 
 
so how does Senior affordable housing work? you have to be 55+ years old to qualify living there? I don't mind the older crowd they tend to be better neighbors and quiet and respectful.  I just worry that people get around that requirement by falsifying info to get cheaper rent , then we end up with seedier young crowd at PP, they are also right across ridge valley road so can "hang out" around the park.  I noticed on weekends some younger seedy crowd driving really fast around Woodbury town center , they will either kill someone on foot or cause a major accident.  One road incident I noticed a car stopped for a pedestrian getting in/out of trader joes and the crazy car behind was speeding and almost hit the other car and blew there horn.  Don't want this type of people in PP
 
Back
Top